Impeachment Inquiry: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, Second Session, Pursuant to H. Res 128, Impeaching Alcee L. Hastings, Judge of the United States District Court ... May 18, 19, 24, 25, 26, June 1, 9, July 6 and 7, 1988, Volume 4
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1988 - 623 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action Alcee Anderson appeal application argument attorney August authorized Baron branch Butzner Chief Clark clause clear Cleveland Committee Committee's communication concerning conduct Conference Congress connection consider consideration constitutional contents copy Coral Gables counsel criminal decision denied Department designation determine disclosed disclosure District Court District Judge District of Florida electronic surveillance Eleventh Circuit enforcement established evidence executive exercise exhibits fact federal filed function further grand jury materials grand jury record granted hearing Honorable House of Representatives impeachment inquiry indictment Inspect intercepted interests issues Judge Hastings judicial Judiciary Justice legislative letter limited matter Mayor Miami motion necessary notice obtain particularized party person Petition presented procedures proceedings proper protect provides question reasons received Report request Rule secrecy seeking Senate September sought Southern District Special standing statute stay Subcommittee submitted Supp testimony trial United States District
Page 548 - Intervene; or (2) when the applicant claims an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and he is so situated that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or Impede his ability to protect that interest, unless the applicant's Interest is adequately represented by existing parties.
Page 122 - But we think the sound construction of the Constitution must allow to the national legislature that discretion, with respect to the means by which the powers it confers are to be carried into execution, which will enable that body to perform the high duties assigned to it, in the manner most beneficial to the people.
Page 708 - ... use, or procures any other person to use or endeavor to use any electronic, mechanical, or other device to intercept any oral communication when...
Page 700 - F.2d 617, 628-629, stated that such reasons were : "(1) To prevent the escape of those whose indictment may be contemplated ; (2) to insure the utmost freedom to the grand jury in its deliberations, and to prevent persons subject to indictment or their friends from importuning the grand jurors; (3) to prevent subornation of perjury or tampering with the witnesses who may testify before grand jury and later appear at the trial of those indicted by it...
Page 738 - F. 2d 617, 628-629, those reasons were summarized as follows : "(1) To prevent the escape of those whose Indictment may be contemplated; (2) to Insure the utmost freedom to the grand jury In Its deliberations, and to prevent persons subject to Indictment or their friends from Importuning the grand jurors; (3) to prevent subornation of perjury or tampering with the witnesses who may testify before...
Page 709 - It shall not be unlawful under this chapter for a person not acting under color of law to intercept a wire or oral communication where such person is a party to the communication or where one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to such interception...
Page 200 - A President's acknowledged need for confidentiality in the communications of his office is general in nature, whereas the constitutional need for production of relevant evidence in a criminal proceeding is specific and central to the fair adjudication of a particular criminal case in the administration of justice. Without access to specific facts a criminal prosecution may be totally frustrated.
Page 386 - Any investigative or law enforcement officer who, by an means authorized by this chapter, has obtained knowledge of the contents of any wire or oral communication, or evidence derived therefrom, may disclose such contents to another investigative or law enforcement officer to the extent that such disclosure is appropriate to the proper performance of the official duties of the officer making or receiving the disclosure.
Page 718 - ... grounds of the motion. If the motion is granted, the contents of the intercepted wire or oral communication, or evidence derived therefrom, shall be treated as having been obtained in violation of this chapter. The judge, upon the filing of such motion by the aggrieved person, may in his discretion make available to the aggrieved person or his counsel for inspection such portions of the intercepted communication or evidence derived therefrom as the judge determines to be in the interests of justice.
Page 714 - ... murder, kidnapping, gambling, robbery, bribery, extortion, or dealing in narcotic drugs, marihuana or other dangerous drugs, or other crime dangerous to life, limb, or property, and punishable by imprisonment for more than one year, designated in any applicable State statute authorizing such interception, or any conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing offenses.