The American and English Encyclopedia of Law, Volume 23John Houston Merrill, Charles Frederic Williams, Thomas Johnson Michie, David Shephard Garland E. Thompson, 1893 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 79
Page 6
... held that the testator cannot give the bene- ficial interest and annex thereto the inconsistent condition that it shall not be liable for the debts of the devisee . But in Spindle v . Shreve , 9 Biss . ( U. S. ) 199 , the dicta in ...
... held that the testator cannot give the bene- ficial interest and annex thereto the inconsistent condition that it shall not be liable for the debts of the devisee . But in Spindle v . Shreve , 9 Biss . ( U. S. ) 199 , the dicta in ...
Page 9
... held that a testator may so give to his son for life the an- nual income of a trust estate that the life tenant cannot alienate or his cred- itors reach it . Massachusetts . — Until quite recently the question had not been directly ad ...
... held that a testator may so give to his son for life the an- nual income of a trust estate that the life tenant cannot alienate or his cred- itors reach it . Massachusetts . — Until quite recently the question had not been directly ad ...
Page 13
... held that the statute did not apply to the case , and that upon general principles B.'s interest could be reached by his judgment creditors . The opinion of the chancellor was , that , apart from the statute , the Eng- lish rule was in ...
... held that the statute did not apply to the case , and that upon general principles B.'s interest could be reached by his judgment creditors . The opinion of the chancellor was , that , apart from the statute , the Eng- lish rule was in ...
Page 38
... held that a decision by the highest court of a State that a statute of the State is repugnant to the constitution of the State , was binding upon the Federal courts . In Gut v . Minnesota , 9 Wall . ( U. S. ) 35 , it was held that the ...
... held that a decision by the highest court of a State that a statute of the State is repugnant to the constitution of the State , was binding upon the Federal courts . In Gut v . Minnesota , 9 Wall . ( U. S. ) 35 , it was held that the ...
Page 67
... held in Greenwade v . De Camp , 72 Cal . 448 , that a default after a first reference to the court did not preclude a second reference . It was held in Thompson v . True , 48 Cal . 601 , that the court had jurisdic- tion to determine ...
... held in Greenwade v . De Camp , 72 Cal . 448 , that a default after a first reference to the court did not preclude a second reference . It was held in Thompson v . True , 48 Cal . 601 , that the court had jurisdic- tion to determine ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action amended appeal apply authority Bank Barb bill bonds Chicot County clause Com'rs common law Conn constitution construction construed contract corporation County court court of equity Cranch U. S. creditors decision defendant duty effect enactment eral Exch execution Gen'l governor grant held Hill N. Y. intention Iowa issued journal judgment jurisdiction land lative lature legislative legislature liable mandamus Mass ment Minn N. J. Eq officers Ohio St pari materia party passed patent person plaintiff preferred stock proceedings provision Q. B. Div quired railroad remedy repeal rule S. W. Rep Smith spendthrift trusts stare decisis stat statute stay stenographer stipulation sufficient suit Tenn tion Turnpike Co valid void Wall Wend words