Circular instructions of February 13, 1889. 348 The act is remedial and should be con- strued liberally in favor of the bona fide set- tler....
In order to sustain a suit under said act it is necessary to show that the land has been erroneously certified or patented under the grant
If part of an entry has been erroneously canceled on account of a railroad grant, it should, under this act, be re-instated, and patent issued thereon if the settler has shown due compliance with law
It is the duty of the Secretary of the In- terior to re-adjudicate cases whenever it ap. pears that the pre-emption or homestead entry of a bona fide settler has been errone- ously canceled on account of a railroad grant ..318, 382 Plea of res judicata can not be interposed to relieve the company from proceedings under the act ....
A judicial decree awarding possession to a purchaser from the company will not pre- vent the Department from taking jurisdic- tion under said act..............
The right to re-instatement conferred upon the settler is superior to that of a bona fide purchaser from the company
Section 3 of said act authorizes re-adjudi- cation where an application to tile or enter has been erroneously rejected by the local
The act entitles a settler to perfect a homestead entry for the entire tract origi- nally applied for notwithstanding the issu- ance of patent to him under the homestead law for a part of said tract.
The right to re-instatement under said act is defeated by a voluntary abandonment of the claim before the grant attached........ 588 A relinquishment executed on notice that the entry had been suspended is not such a "voluntary" abandonment as will bar re-in- statement under the act
Selections should be made from lands nearest the granted sections in which the loss is alleged ....
If the indemnity provided for one of the lines or branches (St. Paul, Minneapolis and Manitoba Railway) prove insufficient therefor, the deficiency may be supplied from the indemnity limits of the other lines or branches
May not be selected within the granted limits of another road, though such road was not constructed within the period fixed by the statute, but was definitely located, and the grant therefor remains unforfeited. 33 Expired filing of record does not bar se- lection of the land, unless it be shown that the pre-emptor had not in fact abandoned the land (St. Paul, Minneapolis and Mani- toba Railway)......
On application to select land covered by an expired filing, a hearing should be had to determine the status of the land (St. Paul, Minneapolis and Manitoba Rail- way)
Withdrawals for the Memphis and Little Rock Company and the Madison and Por- tage Company revoked
An unexpired filing of record at date of definite location excepts the land covered thereby from the grant (Northern Pacific). 380
Under the grant to the St. Paul, Minne- apolis and Manitoba Company, the exist- ence of a filing, when the grant became ef- fective, will raise a presumption of right, which, in the absence of proof to the con- trary, is conclusive as against the grant... 380 The existence of homestead and settle- ment rights at the date of the attachment of the grant excepts the land therefrom... 58 A claim resting on settlement, residence, and improvement, existing when the grant becomes effective, excepts the land covered thereby from the operation of the grant.520, 542
Does not take effect upon land within a prima facie valid homestead entry..
Land not free from "pre-emption or other Page. claims or rights "does not pass, and the validity of such claims is not material (Northern Pacific.)
A claim resting on settlement, residence, and improvement, existing when the grant becomes effective is within the excepting phrase "occupied by homestead settlers" (Northern Pacific.).
Land within the subsisting granted limits of the Atlantic and Pacific, when the map of the designated route of the Southern Pacific was filed, is excepted from the grant to the latter company....
The abandonment of a settlement claim after withdrawal does not render the land subject thereto..
An executive withdrawal should be given effect only to the extent intended by the Department
The revocation of an indemnity withdraw. al takes effect as soon as issued, and a set- tlement on land within such withdrawal, existing at the date of revocation, will be protected as against a subsequent selec- tion......
The company will not be heard to object to a settlement claim within its indemnity limits, after revocation of the withdrawal and in the absence of a selection.
A settlement within an indemnity with- drawal is unavailing as against the com- pany's right of selection
A settlement right existing at the date of indemnity withdrawal excepts the land covered thereby from the effect of such withdrawal
A filing, based on settlement prior to sur- vey, made when it was held that an indem- nity withdrawal did not take effect upon unsurveyed land, is good as against the withdrawal.
Prima facie valid filing of record excepts the land covered thereby from withdrawal on general route. (Sioux City and Pacific). 292 A homestead entry of record at date of indemnity withdrawal excepts the land therefrom...
A claim based on settlement, residence, and improvement existing at the date of withdrawal on general route, excepts the land included therein from such with- drawal. (Northern Pacific.)............ Railroad Lands.
Circular instructions of February 13, 1889, under the act of March 3, 1887.. Section 4 of the act of March 3, 1887, con- fers a preference right upon purchasers in good faith from the company.
Method of procedure and proof required under application for the right of purchase as provided in section 5, act of March 3, 1887 ....27,348 Land excepted from a railroad grant and consequently not withdrawn for its benefit not subject to purchase under the act of January 13, 1881....
Purchaser under the act of January 13, 1881, must show actual settlement, and that he can not acquire title under the pre-emp. tion, homestead, or timber culture law.... 344 Receiver.
With the right to thereafter submit ordi- nary homestead proof can not be allowed to one whose commutation proof is found in- sufficient, but whose entry is not canceled. Not allowed to one who as assigne under a graduation entry made cash payments in lien of settlement and cultivation.......... Will not be allowed if the entry is can- celed on account of its fraudulent char- acter
One who procures an entry through false testimony is not entitled to; and a trans- feree under such an entry has no better right than the entryman
The transferee holding the present inter- est in the land to which title has failed is the party entitled to.......
Disposition of abandoned military, not af- fected by the act of March 2, 1889. that date and circular thereunder)
See Final Proof, Settlement.
After the establishment of, absence caused by official duties will not work a for- feiture of the settler's rights....
Conclusive presumption of abandonment not raised by the fact that the claimant, while absent on account of sickness, voted in the precinct where he had been taken for treatment
Not acquired by one who goes upon pub. lic land with the fixed intention of leaving the same, after colorable compliance with the law, and in the mean time substantially maintains a home elsewhere...
Not acquired or maintained by going upon or visiting land for the purpose of complying with the mere letter of the
On a tract covered by the entry of an- other is unavailing if it is abandoned prior to the cancellation of said entry and not re- sumed until after the intervention of an ad- verse right
COMMUTED HOMESTEAD.
A period of six months inhabitancy im. mediately preceding entry required as a test of good faith; but temporary absences caused by poverty or ill health will not im- pair such inhabitancy.
Six months' presence on the land for the purpose of carrying out the letter of the de- partmental requirement, with the intent to discontinue inhabitancy at the end of that period, not accepted.
Essential requirement of homestead law, dependent upon actual inhabitancy of the land to the exclusion of a home else- where.....
Must be established under homestead en- try within six months from date thereof, and failure in this requirement is consid- ered a defect requiring explanation...
No one but the wife, during the life of the entry, may allege "desertion " in proof of
An absence to procure a support for the family, though covering several years, is not abandonment if the family lives on the land in the mean time..
In computing military service in lieu of, credit should not be allowed twice for a period covered by two enlistments...........
A homesteader who takes title to the tract on which his house is situated by scrip lo- cation and removes to another part of the original claim can not be credited for resi- dence on the first tract...
Credit for, while the land was held under his previous timber culture entry, may be allowed a homesteader in the absence of an intervening claim. .......45, 192
The right to take material from the pub- lic land conferred by the acts of 1872 and and 1875, as defined by the word ‘adjacent' does not extend beyond the tier of sections through which the right of way passes, and an additional tier of sections on either side. 41 The act of March 3, 1875, is applicable to the Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Com- pany and not inconsistent with the act of 1872
Timber may not be taken from lands ad- jacent to one part of the road for the pur. poses of constructing another part..... Depots, station houses, etc., not included in the term "railroad"
Privilege does not attach on the filing and acceptance of the articles of incorporation and proofs of organization, but on definite location, either by actual construction or filing a map..
A map of definite location not required to secure, if a road has been actually con. structed by a company which has observed the preliminary requirements
The notation of the company's right on the entry papers is not authorized where the road is constructed over unsurveyed land, and an entry is afterwards allowed for land through which the road extends...... 115 A statement reserving the right of the company may be placed in a patent issued under an entry allowed for lands over which a road was previously constructed and at a time when the lands were unsurveyed..... 115 Opinion of the Attorney-General requested on the authority of the Department to re- voke an allowance of right-of-way privileges 374 School Land.
Grant of, compared with the swamp grant 308
Page. Confirmatory provisions of the act of March 1, 1877, considered (California)
Indemnity selections certified prior to the act of March 1, 1877, for losses alleged in townships made fractional by the segrega- tion of swamp lands, will not be disturbed (California.)
Right of purchase under the act of March 1, 1877, not defeated by the erroneous can- cellation of a selection.
The rejection of an application to pur chase under the act of March 1, 1877, will not bar a second application by the same party based on a different claim....
An applicant for the right of purchase under the act of March 1, 1877, is an inno- cent purchaser" if his vendor held without notice of defect in the State's title
A purchase after survey of the posses sory right of one who settled prior thereto, confers no right as against the grant....... 495 If the State makes a selection in lieu of land covered by settlement at survey, the reservation is transferred from the basis to the indemnity; and by the same act the claim to the basis is relinquished and the land opened to entry
Title acquired by valid selection will not be impaired in the hands of the State's grantee by a subsequent duplication of the basis
Irregular selections of lands sold to inno- cent purchasers prior to the act of July 23, 1866, confirmed by section 1 of said act (California)
A selection improperly allowed, because of a prior pending claim, may be allowed to stand on the removal of such claim from the record
A selection made on a valid basis, but in- cluding in part lands excluded therefrom, may be approved as to the tract subject to selection
The State is entitled to select indemnity of the character and class it would have re- ceived had there been no deficiency
Where the basis would have been double minimum, if it had not been reserved for school purposes, the State (Minnesota) is entitled to select double minimum land.... Double minimum land may be taken in lieu of double minimum loss, but not for single minimum loss (Louisiana)
Irregularity in the form and place of sec- tion 16, arising from the survey of the township, will not defeat the grant......... 560
A legislative reservation of, not defeated by a subsequent executive reservation of the land for military purposes (Michigan). 560 The selections authorized by the act of May 20, 1826, are not lieu" selections..... 563 Under the act of 1826 the State (Lonisi. ana) is not entitled to indemnity for sections in place, but covered by private grants.... The act of 1826 includes selections for "radiating" and other irregular surveys (Louisiana)
If full compensation has been received on account of a fractional township, further se- lections will not be allowed on the ground that the basis in the original selection was improperly described as a part of sections 16 and 36; and this rule applies whether such selections were made before or after the act of March 1, 1877 (California) The act of August 9, 1888, does not au- thorize the Secretary of the Interior to rec- ognize settlement rights acquired after sur- vey and require the Territory (Wyoming) to select indemnity therefor...
An act reserving lands in a Territory (Wyoming) has the same force, so far as the reservation goes, as a grant for the same purpose to a State.
Commissioner may order a hearing to de- termine the validity of a location Validity of claims may be passed upon where adverse claimants voluntarily appear at a bearing
Adjustment of a location to the line of the public survey does not validace a tion theretofore invalid
« PreviousContinue » |