Page. 324 Northern Pacific R. R. Co., Par. ker v Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v. Ur qubart Northern Pacific R. R. Co. v. Yan tis Northwestern Lode and Mill Site 365 58 6231 1 1 Sah-wah-goo-do gaw 55 437 Saint Paul, Minneapolis and Man192 itoba Ry. Co.... 255 Saint Paul, Minneapolis and Man520 itoba Ry. Co. et al. r. Pederson. 21 Sampson v. Lawrence..... 511 425 | Sargent, John 415 137 Satrum, Peter (... 485 72 Schweitzer v. Ross et al.... 70 576 Schnabelin, John.. 474 Scotford v. Huck. 60 346 Shannon, Jeardoe v. 38 6:30 | Shannon, Tannehill v. (on review) 38 544 Shineberger, Joseph 231 475 Short, Lovia A 512 547 Shumate, Warden v 330 Silva, Miller v 480 Simpson, Willis E., et al 306 324 Simrall, William F. 521 Sioux City and Pacific R. R. Co. 430 v. Lewis et al. 292 593 Sloan, Urialı.. 411 597 Smith, Amos E. 204 367 Smith v. Anderson... 46 Smith v. Custer et al. 269 Smalley i'. Haw blit's. 372 21 Sorenson v. Becker 357 645 Southern Minnesota R. R. Co. et 2821 al...... 472 536 Southern Pacific R.R. Co., Wier v. 282 121 | Spalding o. Colfer 615 | Sparks 1. Galvin.. 534 595 Spence, State of Minnesota v.... 64 493 Stalder, Pierpoint v. 595 Starr i. State of Minnesota 644 482 State of Arkansas 387 294 State of California .... 307 84 73 1 Paazig, Gainer v. Co... Hog Lode v lis and Manitoba Ry. Co. et State of California, Central Pa- 79 24 552 State of California, United 159 States v 4 State of Florida ... 65, 369, 380 294 State of Louisiana.. 126 578 State of Louisiana r. McDonogh 606 et al. (on review).. 134 597 State of Michigan.. 308,560 al. v ..... Pennell, Lewis H. view) Quigley, T. H Raff, St. John v...... 1 Page. 365 377 State of Minnesota 638 189 136 330 113 480 100 Page 1 32 Urquhart, Northern Pacific R. R. 179 Co. v. 64 644 Victorine v. New Orleans and Pa72 cific R. R. Co...... 555 | Waite, Fred. G..... 573 Wakefield, George M. 552 Ward, Gilbert M.. 524 · Warden v. Shumate 601 / Warren, Emma J.. 62 Talbot, Thomas F 282 612 289 576 155 394 623 191 636 555 131 24 18 United States v. State of Cali fornia... United States v. Atterbery et al.. United States, Hardee v United States v. Rhea Union River Logging Railroad Co. 58 279 Watts et al., Delaney v........ 584 Weed, Thurlow Weir v. Southern Pacific R. R. 495 Co.... 38 Welo, Caroline . 598 West, Bartl v...... 279 West v. Owen 530 White v. McGurk et al. (on re493 view) 104 Wilds, Henry 285 Willis v. Parker 626 Winslow, Robert M. 368 Wintamute, D. D. 205 Wisconsin v. Wolf.. 110 Wolters, Charles.. Wybrant, H. P., et al...... 4 173 Yantis, Northern Pacific R. R. 391 Co. v. 578 Yates et al., Taylor v.. 374 Zalondek, Streib v. 601 TABLE OF CASES CITED. [The abbreviation "L. D." refers to this publication; "B. L. P." refers to Brainerd's Legal Precedents; "1 C. L. L.," to Copp's Public Land Laws, Ed. 1875; "2 C. L. L.," to Copp's Public Land Laws, Ed. 1882; "C. L. O.," to Copp's Land Owner; "C. M. D.," to Copp's Mining Decisions; "C. M. L.," to Copp's Mineral Lands; "Lester," to Lester's Land Laws and Decisions; "Rep.," to the Reporter; "S. M. D.," to Sickles' Mining Laws and Decisions; and "C. Cls.," to the Court of Claims.] ..... Aiken v. Ferry; 6 Saw., 79. D., 33... Alabama and Chattanooga R. R. Co. v. Allen, Adelphi; 6 L. D., 420 Allen v. Leet; 6 L. D., 669...... Allman v. Thulon; 1 C. L. L., 690........ Atlantic and Pacific R. R. Co. v. McCabe ; 4 L. D., 94.. Austin v. Norin; 4 L. D., 461......................... Bailey, John W. et al.; 5 L. D., 216 Page. 277 592 33 451 391 391 373 97, 201 500 460 567 111 Baldwin v. Stark; 107 U. S., 463.. 532 Barnett v. Crow; 5 L. D., 372... Blane v. Lafayette; 11 How., 104... Blodgett v. Central Pacific R. R. Co.; 6 L. Blunt, Elias; 5 L. D., 617 Bodie Tunnel and Mining Co. v. Bechtel 23, 37 241 535 288, 449 311 389 242 393 107 533 50 Boeing Wilhelm; 6 L. D., 262 Brake v. Ballon; 19 Kans., 402.. Branagan et al. v. Dulaney; 2 L. D., 744 .. 190 S.. 55..... Buxton v. Traver; 130 U. S., 232.... Byer v. Burrill; 6 L. D., 521.. Page. 83 535 22 Cain, James A.; 7 L. D., 482.. 206 California v. Townsend; 2 C. L. L., 1117.. 322 4€6 480 125 Brassfield e. Eshom; 8 L. D., 1 277 Bright et al. v. Elkhorn Mining Co.; 8 L. 214 Bright v. Northern Pac. R. R. Co.; 6 L. D., Brittin, James; 4 L. D., 441........................ Brown v. Central Pacific R. R. Co.; 6 L. Bunnell, Louis W.; 7 L. D., 231 Burgel, Joseph.... Butts v. Northern Pacific R. R. Co.; 119 U. 89 554 278 178 569 419 528 391 176 125 362 569 629 440 292, 572 567 530 104 311 541 176 411 540 California and Oregon R. R. Co. v. Califor nia; 4 L. D., 142..... Cameron, John; 7 L. D., 436 Cedar Rapids R. R. Co. v. Herring; 110 U. Central Pacific R. R. Co. v. Benity; 5Saw., 118... Central Pacific R. R. Co. v. Dyer; 1 Saw. 641..... Central Pacific R. R. Co. v. Wolford; 3 L. D., 264 Chaffin v. Taylor; 116 U. S., 567. Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Ry. Co. v. Amundson; 8 L. D., 291.... Choate, John R.; 7 L. D., 281 Chotard v. Pope; 12 Wheat., 588 Chrisinger, R. M.; 4 L. D., 347 Churchill v. Seeley; 4 L. D., 589. Clark, Daniel; 1 C. L. L., 494 Clark, George T.; 6 L. D., 157 Clarke, Judith M.; 7 L. D., 485 Cleghorn v. Bird; 4 L. D., 478 Clement v. Heney; 6 L. D., 641. Clements v. Warner; 24 How., 394. Cleveland v. Dunlevy; 4 L. D., 121.. Cole, Harlan : 6 L. D., 290 ... Coleman v. Winfield; 6 L. D., 826 Collar v. Collar; 4 L. D., 26 Colorado Coal Co. v. United States; 123 U. S., 314... Cooper v. Roberts; 18 How., 173 D., 542 Durand v. Martin; 120 U. S., 366.. Durbize, John; 6 L. D., 536 78 369 415 606 139 400, 535 414 414 236 278 .300, 452, 533 602 97 . Page. Davidson v. Kokojan; 7 L. D., 436 Drew, William L.; 8 L. D., 399... 23 117 117 364, 523 264 572 606 90 .335, 525, 653 478, 596 455 532, 584 204, 411 442 581, 596 168 500, 600 97 542 201 50 311, 565 460 567 161 578, 586 653 504 248 541, 604 456 107 32 36 108 .51, 114, 432, 451 108 93 542 535 473 9 108 Dungan v. Griffen's heirs; 1 C. L. L., 254. Eddy v. England; 6 L. D., 530.... Edwards' Lessee v. Darby; 12 Wheat., 206... Eldred v. Sexton; 19 Wall., 189 Emmert, David B.; 3 L. D., 55 Esler v. Townsite of Cooke; 4 L. D., 212.. Farnsworth v. Hudson; 5 L. D., 315...... Farnsworth v. Minnesota and Pacific R. R. Co.; 92 U. S., 49.... Featherspil, John C.; 4 L. D., 570.. Ferguson v. Hoff; 4 L. D., 491 Filkins, Charles W.; 5 L. D., 49 Fitzsimmons v. Meder; 6 L. D., 93. Flint, A. E.; 6 L. D., 668 Foote, George B.; 2 L. D., 773 Forgeot, Margaret; 7 L. D., 280 Foster, David; 2 C. L. L., 1125 Foster v. McLean; 2 L. D., 175. Frank, Samuel M.; 2 L. D., 628 Fraser v. Ringgold; 3 L. D., 69. French, William (on review); 2 L. D., 238. Friese v. Hobson; 4 L. D., 580.............. Friend, William; 5 L. D., 38 Frisbie v. Whitney; 9 Wall., 157. Frohne v. Sanborn; 6 L. D., 491 Frue, W. B. et al. (Topsy Mine); 7 C. L. O., 20..... Fruit, Henry D.; 6 L. D., 138. Page. 289 553, 581 Gage v. Lemieux; 8 L. D., 139 93 89, 422 57 578,586 111 52 419, 504 206 578 Fagan v. Jiran; 4 L. D., 141.. 621 553 322 415 567, 613 478 446 560 592 416 479 466 600 87 104 436 540 176 419, 503 52, 371 235 .463, 581, 596 414 275, 301 536 224 510 576 277 554 432 618, 628 450 109, 263 226 241 393 Geer e. Farrington; 4 L. D., 410.. 504 99 612 505 243 Greenwood v. Peters; 4 L. D., 237.. .54, 568, 654 Grinnell v. Railroad Co.; 103 U. S., 739... 23 414 529 Grisar r. McDowell; 6 Wall., 381 Grove v. Crooks; 7 L. D., 140 |
0 Reviews Reviews aren't verified, but Google checks for and removes fake content when it's identified Write review |