Reports of Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of the State of Utah, Volume 28
Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, George L. Nye, Joseph M. Tanner, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, William S. Dalton, Alonzo Blair Irvine, H. Arnold Rich, Harmel L. Pratt
A. L. Bancroft, 1905
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
accident action affirmed agreed alleged amount appellant application assessments authority benefit camp cause certificate charge claim clerk Company complaint condition Constitution construction contract corporation costs court damages Decided defendant delivered direct District duty effect engine entered entitled error evidence exercise fact failed favor filed follows furnished further give given ground held hold injury instructions interest Judge judgment jurisdiction jury justice land lien light matter ment Mining negligence notice objection officer Ogden operation opinion owner paid party payment perform person plaintiff possession premises present purchase question Railroad reason received record recover referred rendered respecting respondent rule Salt Lake City servant statute Sterling sufficient suit taken taking thereof tion track transaction trial Utah witness
Page 556 - Robbery is the felonious taking of personal property in the possession of another, from his person or immediate presence, and against his will, accomplished by means of force or fear.
Page 385 - Having no absolute right of recognition in other states, but depending for such recognition and the enforcement of its contracts upon their assent, it follows, as a matter of course, that such assent may be granted upon such terms and conditions as those states may think proper to impose.
Page 66 - ... the workman, or in case the injury results in death, the legal personal representatives of the workman, and any persons entitled in case of death, shall have the same right of compensation and remedies against the employer as if the workman had not been a workman of nor in the service of the employer, nor engaged in his work.
Page 138 - Then, when both sides rested, the defense requested the court to instruct the Jury to return a verdict in favor of the defendant, which request was refused, and thereafter a motion for a new trial denied.
Page 42 - A city has two classes of powers — the one legislative, public, governmental, in the exercise of which it is a sovereignty and governs its people; the other, proprietary, quasi private, conferred upon it, not for the purpose of governing its people, but for the private advantage of the inhabitants of the city and of the city itself as a legal personality.
Page 121 - We can conceive of no principle which permits the disfranchisement of innocent voters for the mistake, or even the willful misconduct, of election officers in performing the duty cast upon them. The object of elections is to ascertain the popular will, and not to thwart it. The object of election laws is to secure the rights of duly qualified electors, and not to defeat them. Statutory regulations are enacted to secure freedom of choice and to prevent fraud, and not by technical obstructions to make...
Page 250 - A challenge to the panel can be founded only on a material departure from the forms prescribed in respect to the drawing and return of the jury in civil actions, or on the intentional omission of the sheriff to summon one or more of the jurors drawn.
Page 316 - If the property sought to be condemned constitutes only a part of a larger parcel, the damages which will accrue to the portion not sought to be condemned, by reason of its severance from the portion sought to be condemned, and the construction of the improvement in the manner proposed by the plaintiff; 3.
Page 123 - ... participate, and to cause to be printed on the ballot the name of every candidate, whose nomination has been certified to or filed with the county clerk in the manner provided for in this act.