« PreviousContinue »
Lenoir 0. Lenoir, 24 D. C.
ters, 22 D. C.
ters, 22 D. C.
Sec. 963. PETITION.-All applications for divorce or Sec. 85. for a decree annulling a marriage shall be made by petition to the supreme court of the District, and the proceedings thereupon shall be the same as in equity causes, except so far as otherwise herein provided: Provided, however, That all petitions for divorce pending on the thirty-first day of December, nineteen hundred and one, may be proceeded with and disposed of under the provisions of the statutes in force on said date. (32 Stat., p. 537.)
Sec. 964. PROOF REQUIRED.—No decree for a divorce, or decree annulling a marriage, shall be rendered on de- App., 161; Michafault, without proof; nor shall
' any admission contained wicz,25 D. C. in the answer of the defendant be taken as proof of the facts charged as the ground of the application, but the same shall, in all cases, be proved by other evidence.
Sec. 965. DECREE ANNULLING MARRIAGE.-A decree Mackey v. Pe annulling the marriage as illegal and void may be rendered App., 341; 24 D.C. on any of the grounds mentioned in chapter forty-three as
App., 160. invalidating a marriage. Sec. 966. CAUSES FOR DIVORCE A VINCULO AND FOR
Mackey v. Pe DIVORCE A MENSA ET THORO.—A divorce from the bond of Alaschaur v. marriage may be granted only where one of the parties has Maschaur, 23 D. committed adultery during the marriage: Provided, That C. App:, 87-94. in such case the innocent party only may remarry, but Bernsdorff, 26 D. nothing herein contained shall prevent the remarriage of PBX bre; sec. the divorced parties to each other: And provided, That Dabney, 20 D. C. legal separation from bed and board may be granted for Slate v. Feam, drunkenness, cruelty, or desertion: And provided, That 47 Wash., 541. marriage contracts may be declared void in the following cases:
First. Where such marriage was contracted while either of the parties thereto had a former wife or husband living, unless the former marriage had been lawfully dissolved.
Second. Where such marriage was contracted during the lunacy of either party (unless there has been voluntary cohabitation after the lunacy) or was procured by fraud or coercion.
Third. Where either party was matrimonially incapacitated at the time of marriage and has continued so.
Fourth. Where either of the parties had not arrived at the age of legal consent to the contract of marriage (unless there has been voluntary cohabitation after coming to legal age), but in such cases only at the suit of the party not capable of consenting.
CODE OF LAW FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
Mascha ur v. laschaur, 23 D. C. App., 93.
20 D. C.
Downs 0. Downs, 23 D. C.
S. D, C., 740.
Sec. 967. FOREGOING SECTION NOT RETROACTIVE.—The provisions of this Act shall not invalidate any marriage heretofore solemnized according to law, or affect the validity of any decree or judgment of divorce heretofore pronounced.
Sec. 968. IN SUITS FOR DIVORCE A VINCULO DIVORCE A MENSA ET THORO MAY BE DECREED.—Where a divorce from the bond of marriage is prayed for the court shall have authority to decree a divorce from bed and board if the causes proved be sufficient to entitle the party to
such relief only. Dabney v. Dab- Sec. 969. REVOCATION OF DIVORCE MENSA
is decreed it may at any time thereafter be revoked by the
charged from the operation of the decree.
THORO.- Where a divorce from bed and board has been
Sec. 971. ONLY RESIDENTS DIVORCED.—No decree of pp., 87 20 D. nullity of marriage or divorce shall be rendered in favor (. App., 535; R.
of anyone not a resident of the District of Columbia, and
prior to residence therein.
marriage shall be declared by decree to have been void on
parent who was capable of contracting. Ib., 743.
Sec. 973. ISSUE OF A LUNATIC'S MARRIAGE.—Where a marriage is declared null and void on account of the idiocy or lunacy of either party at the time of the marriage the issue of the marriage shall be deemed legitimate.
Sec. 974. LEGITIMACY OF ISSUE OF A MARRIAGE DISSOLVED.--A divorce for any of the causes herein provided for shall not affect the legitimacy of the issue of the marriage dissolved by such divorce, but the legitimacy of such issue, if questioned, shall be tried and determined according to the course of the common law.
Sec. 975. ALIMONY PENDENTE LITE.—During the pendD. C. App., 475; 25 D. C. App.,356; ency of a suit for divorce, or a suit by the husband to custody a pb she declare the marriage null and void, where the nullity is R. S D., 747; denied by the wife, the court shall have power to require 38 L. R., 813.
the husband to pay alimony to the wife for the main
Ib., sec. 969; 21
1 D. C. App.,
tenance of herself and their minor children committed to her care, and suit money, including counsel fees, to enable her to conduct her case, whether she be plaintiff or defendant, and to enforce obedience to any order in regard thereto by attachment and imprisonment for disobedience. The court may also enjoin any disposition of the husband's property to avoid the collection of said allowances, and may, in case of the husband's failure or refusal to pay such alimony and suit money, sequestrate his property and apply the income thereof to such objects. The court may also determine whether the husband or wife] who shall have the care and custody of infant children pending the proceedings. (32 Stat., p. 537.)
Sec. 976. PERMANENT ALIMONY. When a divorce is įb. granted to the wife, the court shall have authority to decree 200; R. S. D.E. her permanent alimony sufficient for her support and that 745. of any minor children whom the court may assign to her care, and to secure and enforce the payment of said alimony in the manner before mentioned, and may, if it shall seem fit, retain to the wife, her right of dower in the husband's estate.
Sec. 977. If the divorce is granted on the application of the husband, the court may, nevertheless, require him to pay alimony to the wife, if it shall seem just and proper t; but in such cases the husband may appeal]. (32 Stat., p.537.)
Sec. 978. After a decree of divorce in any case granting alimony and providing for the care and custody of children, the case shall still be considered open for any future orders in those respects. Sec. 979. MAIDEN
RESTORED. -In granting a divorce from the bond of marriage the court may restore to the wife her maiden or other previous name.
any n. c. App., 475; husband shall fail or refuse to maintain his wife and Beal v. Beal, 34 minor children, if any, although able to do so, the court, dorff on application of the wife, may decree that he shall pay dorf, 26. DES her, periodically, such sums as would be allowed to her as Stat., p. 86, 50). permanent alimony in case of divorce for the maintenance of herself and the minor children committed to her care by the court, and the payment thereof may be enforced in the same manner as directed in regard to such permanent alimony.
Sec. 981. SUIT TO DECLARE When the validity of any alleged marriage shall be denied by either of the parties thereto the other party may institute a suit for aflirming the marriage, and
due proof of the validity thereof it shall be decreed to be valid, and such decree shall be conclusive upon all parties concerned.
Sec. 982. COURT TO ASSIGN ATTORNEY TESTED CASES.—In all uncontested divorce cases, and in App., 160. any other divorce case where the court may deem it necessary or proper, a disinterested attorney shall be as
R. S. D. C., 748.
Lesh v. Lesh, 21
L. R.,388; Berns
Lenoir 0. Lenoir, 24 D. C.
signed by the court to enter his appearance for the defendant and actively defend the cause, and such attorney shall receive such compensation for his services as the court may determine to be proper, such compensation to be paid by the parties as the court may direct.
Sec. 983. [CORRESPONDENTS] CO-RESPONDENTS.-In all divorce cases where adultery is charged the person or persons with whom the adultery is charged to have been committed shall be made defendant or defendants and brought in by personal service of process or by publication as in other cases.
Secs. 986, 994. Wilkes v. Wilkes,
Sec. 984. PARTIES.—Every action of ejectment shall be brought in the name of the real claimant and may be 18 D.C. App., 90 brought against the person actually occupying the premi- 30 D.C. App:: 122 ses claimed, either in person or by tenant, or against both 23 D. C. App, 550 the claimant and his tenant, or other occupant claiming 10 D.C. App.,260. under him, or, if they be not actually occupied, against some person exercising acts of ownership thereon adversely to the plaintiff. If a lessee be made a defendant at the suit of a party claiming against the title of his landlord such landlord may appear and be made a party defendant in the place of his lessee. And any person claiming to be in possession may, on motion, be admitted to defend the action.
Sec. 985. FORM OF DECLARATION.—The plaintiff in his declaration must describe the premises claimed with reasonable certainty, and set forth distinctly the nature and quantity of the estate claimed by him in the same, and it shall be sufficient for him to state in addition thereto that the plaintiff was possessed of the premises, and while he was so possessed the defendant entered wrongfully into possession of the same and withholds the possession thereof from the plaintiff, or wrongfully detains such possession, or that the defendant is wrongfully exercising acts of ownership thereon. Such acts of ownership, however, unaccompanied with possession shall not, except as hereinafter provided, be held to amount to an adversary possession, so as to make it necessary for the plaintiff to sue in order to avoid the bar of the statute of limitations.
Sec. 986. COUNTS.—The declaration may contain several counts and several parties may be named as plaintiffs, jointly in one count and separately in others.
(Repealed-32 Stat., Part I p. 537.) [Sec. 987. PLEADING.—The defendant may demur or may plead the general issue of “not guilty," which shall put in issue the plaintiff's title and right to the possession and under which all matters of defense may be given in evidence.]
Sec. 988. EVIDENCE.-It shall be sufficient to entitle, Sec. 999; 30 D. the plaintiff to a verdict to show that he is entitled, as D. c. App., 231 against the defendant, to the immediate possession of the 24 D.C. APP:; 120 premises claimed and that the defendant is in possession 27 D. C. App. 395 thereof, holding adversely to the plaintiff, or is exer- 10 D. C. App., 30 cising acts of ownership over the same adversely to the 18 D.C: App.;498 plaintiff; except that in an action by one or more joint 2 D. C. App.,202 tenants or tenants in common against their cotenants, the 27 D. C. App. 401 plaintiffs shall be required to prove an actual ouster or 188 U. 8., 28.