Department of the Interior Grazing Decisions, 1936-1958U.S. Government Printing Office, 1959 - 752 pages |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
5-year period immediately Accordingly acres acting regional grazier action adjudication Administrative Procedure Act advisory board agreement allotment Appellant Decided appellant's application for grazing approved April August AUMS base lands base property basis Bureau of Land canceled carrying capacity claim considered dated December December 31 Department determination Director district grazier Division of Grazing entitled evidence examiner's decision extent fact Federal Range Code fence full-time water granted grazing license grazing privileges grazing season Grazing Service Hackler head of cattle horses interveners involved issuance issued January January 28 July land dependent Land Management lease license or permit license to graze livestock operations March March 16 ment Mexico Grazing District moot number of livestock OSCAR L parties permittee prior water priority period proper provides public domain public range qualified ranch range manager reason regulations Sellas September 23 service area sheep stock driveway Taylor Grazing Act testimony tion transfer Ute Tribe
Popular passages
Page 652 - Every party shall have the right to present his case or defense by oral or documentary evidence, to submit rebuttal evidence, and to conduct such cross-examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
Page 128 - All patents granted, or preemption or homesteads allowed, shall be subject to any vested and accrued water rights, or rights to ditches and reservoirs used in connection with such water rights, as may have been acquired under or recognized by the preceding section.
Page 649 - ... (2) the legal authority and jurisdiction under which the hearing is to be held; and (3) the matters of fact and law asserted. In instances in which private persons are the moving parties, other parties to the proceeding shall give prompt notice of issues controverted in fact or law; and in other instances agencies may by rule require responsive pleading. In fixing the...
Page 604 - In making the foregoing determinations the court shall review the whole record or such portions thereof as may be cited by any party, and due account shall be taken of the rule of prejudicial error.
Page 652 - Except as otherwise provided by statute, the proponent of a rule or order has the burden of proof. Any oral or documentary evidence may be received, but the agency as a matter of policy shall provide for the exclusion of irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence.
Page 64 - That whenever by priority of possession, rights to the use of water for mining, agricultural, manufacturing, or other purposes, have vested and accrued, and the same are recognized and acknowledged by the local customs, laws, and the decisions of courts, the possessors and owners of such vested rights shall be maintained and protected in the same ; and the right of way for the construction of ditches and canals for the purposes aforesaid is hereby acknowledged and confirmed...
Page 653 - But it has long been settled that the technical rules for the exclusion of evidence applicable in jury trials do not apply to proceedings before federal administrative agencies in the absence of a statutory requirement that such 'rules are to be observed.
Page 122 - ... be designated by the Secretary of the Interior as subject to entry under the provisions of that act; with the exception, however, that entrymen of such lands need not reside thereon.
Page 671 - Therefore, pursuant to the authority delegated to the Solicitor by the Secretary of the Interior (sec. 23, Order No. 2509, as revised; 17 FR...
Page 654 - Secretary may delegate the function of issuing grazing permits, and at such other times as its members may be called By such officer. Each board shall offer advice and make a recommendation on each application for such a grazing permit...