What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
actual appeared applied apprehend arrest assailant assault assistance attack attempt authority believe blow bodily called cause character charge child circumstances cited committed common law consequence considered constable convicted course court Cox C. C. crime criminal danger death deceased defendant deliberate directed door doubt duty East effect ensue evidence excuse execution exist fact felony fire force Fost give given ground guilty Hale hand harm held homicide immediately indictment inflicted infra injury intent judge jury justice justify killing liable Lord malice manslaughter matter means mind murder nature necessary negligence night notice object offence officer opinion particular party passed peace person present principle prisoner produced proved provocation punishment question reason resistance responsible result rule self-defence shoot statute sufficient supposed supra taken tion unlawful unless violence warrant weapon wife wound
Page 477 - ... to establish a defence on the ground of insanity, it must be clearly proved that at the time of committing the act the party accused was laboring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, or if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong.
Page 687 - We think that in all cases of this nature the law has invested courts of justice with the authority to discharge a jury from giving any verdict, whenever, in their opinion, taking all the circumstances into consideration, there is a manifest necessity for the act, or the ends of public justice would otherwise be defeated.
Page 519 - ... when there shall be a reasonable ground to apprehend a design to commit a felony or to do some great personal injury, and there shall be imminent danger of such design being accomplished: or, 3.
Page 763 - ... in order to constitute a crime, a person must have intelligence and capacity enough to have a criminal intent and purpose; and if his reason and mental powers are either so deficient that he has no will, no conscience, or controlling mental power, or if, through the overwhelming violence of mental disease, his intellectual power is for the time obliterated, he is not a responsible moral agent, and is not punishable for criminal acts.
Page 544 - It is not a mere possible doubt; because everything relating to human affairs, and depending on moral evidence, is open to some possible or imaginary doubt. It is that state of the case, which, after the entire comparison and consideration of all the evidence, leaves the minds of jurors in that condition that they cannot say they feel an abiding conviction, to a moral certainty, of the truth of the charge.
Page 477 - As these two questions appear to us to be more conveniently answered together, we submit our opinion to be that the jury ought to be told in all cases that every man is presumed to be sane, and to possess a sufficient degree of reason to be responsible for his crimes, until the contrary be proved to their satisfaction.
Page 724 - ... immediate action, and no opportunity is given for procuring the advice or sanction of the magistrate, it is the duty of every subject to act for himself, and upon his own responsibility, in suppressing a riotous and tumultuous assembly ; and he may be assured that whatever is honestly done by him in the execution of that object, will be supported and justified by the common law...
Page 714 - Where a known felony is attempted upon the person, be it to rob or murder, here the party assaulted may repel force...