Select Problems in Historical Interpretation: Government and the American economy, 1870-present |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 43
Page viii
81 Testimony of William H. Vanderbilt , 1879 B. The Railroads and the Oil Industry . 1. The Standard Oil and the New York Central 82 83 CRIMINATION 1. Excessive Rates . 57 Affidavit of James H. Devereux , 1880 Speeches of ...
81 Testimony of William H. Vanderbilt , 1879 B. The Railroads and the Oil Industry . 1. The Standard Oil and the New York Central 82 83 CRIMINATION 1. Excessive Rates . 57 Affidavit of James H. Devereux , 1880 Speeches of ...
Page 89
It was this device of long standing legal use which was given a new meaning and turned to a different purpose by the Standard Oil . Only gradually did the Standard officials work out their new concept of the trust .
It was this device of long standing legal use which was given a new meaning and turned to a different purpose by the Standard Oil . Only gradually did the Standard officials work out their new concept of the trust .
Page 114
Justice Har. lan dissented in the Standard Oil case. He agreed that the Standard was a monopoly, but he felt that the legislators of 1890 had no such “rule of reason” in mind.” In the light of the 1890 debate, whose interpretation ...
Justice Har. lan dissented in the Standard Oil case. He agreed that the Standard was a monopoly, but he felt that the legislators of 1890 had no such “rule of reason” in mind.” In the light of the 1890 debate, whose interpretation ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
I | 2 |
PHILOSOPHERS OF LAISSEZ FAIRE | 7 |
Attitudes during the Progressive Era | 13 |
Copyright | |
47 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action administration agricultural American amount asked authority believe Board called capital cars cent Cleveland coal combination commerce Commissioner committee common competition Congress conservation contract corporation cost course court deal demand direct economic effect employees fact farm farmers Federal force give hand important increase individual industry interests issue labor land less major manufacturers materials matter means ment nature necessary never operation organization party persons political possible practices present President Problem production profits protection Pullman question railroad reason received regulation relations representatives result road secure Senator Standard Oil steel strike supply thing tion trade trust union United wages whole workers