Impeachment Inquiry: Hearings Before the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-third Congress, Second Session, Pursuant to H. Res. 803 ....U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975 - 2258 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 1467
... talking about delivery of is that what you said , that there is no question that the materials were delivered to GSA before the end of the year ? Mr. NUSSBAUM . As I understand it , that is correct , yes . Mr. OWENS . You were not ...
... talking about delivery of is that what you said , that there is no question that the materials were delivered to GSA before the end of the year ? Mr. NUSSBAUM . As I understand it , that is correct , yes . Mr. OWENS . You were not ...
Page 1468
... talking about there . Mr. NUSSBAUM . That is correct , Mr. Congressman . Mr. FLOWERS . When you are talking about 10 percent of adjusted gross income of a man making $ 250,000 , you are talking about $ 25,000 worth of deduction , are ...
... talking about there . Mr. NUSSBAUM . That is correct , Mr. Congressman . Mr. FLOWERS . When you are talking about 10 percent of adjusted gross income of a man making $ 250,000 , you are talking about $ 25,000 worth of deduction , are ...
Page 1472
... talking about when you say White House at this point ? Mr. NUSSBAUM . I am talking about the White House , Mr. Morgan and Mr. Stewart , Edward Morgan who is a deputy counsel to the President , who was on Mr. Ehrlichman's staff and Mr ...
... talking about when you say White House at this point ? Mr. NUSSBAUM . I am talking about the White House , Mr. Morgan and Mr. Stewart , Edward Morgan who is a deputy counsel to the President , who was on Mr. Ehrlichman's staff and Mr ...
Page 1473
... talked with Mr. DeMarco . So , consequently , his present statements to this committee as well as to the Joint ... talking about are the papers delivered in 1968 and the papers delivered in 1969 and claimed as a deduction , is that ...
... talked with Mr. DeMarco . So , consequently , his present statements to this committee as well as to the Joint ... talking about are the papers delivered in 1968 and the papers delivered in 1969 and claimed as a deduction , is that ...
Page 1481
... talking about the 1969 gift pa- pers . He says he appraised the papers from the 6th through the 8th day of April 1969 and on November 3 , 1969 , November 17 through November 20 , 1969 , and December 8 , 1969 . Mr. Newman now ...
... talking about the 1969 gift pa- pers . He says he appraised the papers from the 6th through the 8th day of April 1969 and on November 3 , 1969 , November 17 through November 20 , 1969 , and December 8 , 1969 . Mr. Newman now ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
alleged amendment April articles of impeachment Attorney BROOKS BUTLER Chair Chairman Charles Colson CLAIR CLERK COHEN Colson CONGRESS Constitution conversation CONYERS court crimes and misdemeanors criminal DANIELSON Dean debate deed DeMarco DENNIS discussion DOAR DONOHUE DRINAN EDWARDS Ehrlichman Eilberg evidence executive session fact FLOWERS FROEHLICH gentleman yield going grand jury H. R. Haldeman Haldeman hearings HOGAN HOLTZMAN HUNGATE Hutchinson impeachment inquiry Internal Revenue Service investigation JENNER John Dean John Doar John Ehrlichman Joint Committee Kastenmeier LATTA LOTT MARAZITI March 21 material matter MAYNE McCAHILL McCLORY meeting memorandum ment MEZVINSKY Mitchell motion NUSSBAUM OWENS Petersen presentation President President's question RAILSBACK RANGEL record reference request resolution respect response rules SANDMAN SARBANES SEIBERLING Senate special counsel staff statement subpena suggest talking tape testimony Thank thing THORNTON tion transcript understand vote WALDIE Watergate White House WIGGINS witnesses
Popular passages
Page 1588 - No evidence or testimony taken in executive session may be released or used in public sessions without the consent of the committee.
Page 1524 - Except as provided in section 276 — (a) GENERAL RULE. — The amount of income taxes imposed by this title shall be assessed within three years after the return was filed, and no proceeding in court without assessment for the collection of such taxes shall be begun after the expiration of such period.
Page 2206 - Congress, did attempt to bring into disgrace, ridicule, hatred, contempt and reproach the Congress of the United States, and the several branches thereof, to impair and destroy the regard and respect of all the good people of the United States...
Page 1934 - Relevant evidence" means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.
Page 2187 - Magistracy, existing at the time of increase or diminution, and to be ineligible a second time; and that besides a general authority to execute the National Laws, it ought to enjoy the Executive rights vested in Congress by the Confederation.
Page 2206 - ... which said utterances, declarations, threats, and harangues, highly censurable in any, are peculiarly indecent and unbecoming in the Chief Magistrate of the United States, by means whereof said Andrew Johnson has brought the high office of the President of the United States into contempt, ridicule, and disgrace, to the great scandal of all good citizens; whereby said Andrew Johnson.
Page 2206 - United -States, unmindful of the high duties of his office and of his oath of office, with intent unlawfully to control the disbursements of the moneys appropriated for the military service and for the Department of War, on the...
Page 1704 - ... completion of the hearing, to call witnesses selected by the minority to testify with respect to that measure or matter during at least one day of hearing thereon.
Page 1559 - The CHAIRMAN. The time of the gentleman from Illinois has expired. Mr.
Page 1822 - I told Mr. Krogh that as a matter of first priority, the unit should find out all it could about Mr. Ellsberg's associates and his motives. Because of the extreme gravity of the situation, and not then knowing what additional national secrets Mr. Ellsberg might disclose, I did impress upon Mr. Krogh the vital importance to the national security of his assignment. I did not authorize and had no knowledge...