Pennsylvania State Reports, Volume 10West Publishing Company, 1849 "Containing cases decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania." (varies) |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 29
... debts to meet . The defendants offered to show that the goods consigned to them by Proctor , and in their hands on the 3d April , 1841 , were after- wards sold and netted $ 620.32 , and that he was before that time indebted to them far ...
... debts to meet . The defendants offered to show that the goods consigned to them by Proctor , and in their hands on the 3d April , 1841 , were after- wards sold and netted $ 620.32 , and that he was before that time indebted to them far ...
Page 33
... debts of third persons . The phrase " when in funds , " as here used , is equivalent to " when in debt to the drawer , " which , by reason of the factor's right of absolute appropriation , cannot be while the principal is indebted to ...
... debts of third persons . The phrase " when in funds , " as here used , is equivalent to " when in debt to the drawer , " which , by reason of the factor's right of absolute appropriation , cannot be while the principal is indebted to ...
Page 49
... debts due by that firm , or even that there was a clear cash balance due Harris : now the act requires that VOL . X. - 7 D 2 the payment shall be clear of all claims or debts ANDREWS v . SCHOTT . 49.
... debts due by that firm , or even that there was a clear cash balance due Harris : now the act requires that VOL . X. - 7 D 2 the payment shall be clear of all claims or debts ANDREWS v . SCHOTT . 49.
Page 50
Pennsylvania. Supreme Court. the payment shall be clear of all claims or debts due by the general partners . This cannot be assumed on an affidavit , which states the payment in this inferential manner . There was here a dissolution of ...
Pennsylvania. Supreme Court. the payment shall be clear of all claims or debts due by the general partners . This cannot be assumed on an affidavit , which states the payment in this inferential manner . There was here a dissolution of ...
Page 51
... from the payment of the debts of the firm , who are the persons composing it , who are general , and who are special partners . To add the prohibited word " Com- pany , " or to use any other general term ANDREWS v . SCHOTT . 51.
... from the payment of the debts of the firm , who are the persons composing it , who are general , and who are special partners . To add the prohibited word " Com- pany , " or to use any other general term ANDREWS v . SCHOTT . 51.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action administrator adverse possession alleged amount appear April assignment assumpsit bank Barr bequest bill bond bound charge choses in action claim common law Common Pleas commonwealth contrà.-The contract conveyance court creditors Dauphin county death debts declared decree deed defendant devise directed effect entitled equity evidence execution executors fact favour filed fraud fund garnishee grantor Greenl heirs held husband instructed the jury intent interest intestate issue judge Judgment affirmed jurisdiction justice land legacy liable lien March 12 marriage ment mortgage Nisi Prius notice objection Orphans owner paid parties partner payment personal estate Philadelphia plaintiff in error plaintiff in error.-The possession principle proceeds proof proved purchase-money purchaser question real estate received record recover rent rule scire facias settled sheriff sheriff's sale sold statute statute of limitations subsequent surety taxes testator's tion trust vested void wife witness words writ
Popular passages
Page 530 - the rule of law is clear, that, where one, by his words or conduct, wilfully causes another to believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from averring against the latter, a different state of things, as existing at the same time.
Page 170 - The test whether a demand connected with an illegal transaction is capable of being enforced at law is whether the plaintiff requires the aid of the Illegal transaction to establish his case.
Page 158 - The records and judicial proceedings of the courts of any State or Territory, or of any such country, shall be proved or admitted in any other court within the United States, by the attestation of the clerk, and the seal of the court annexed, if there be a seal, together with a certificate of the judge, chief justice, or presiding magistrate, that the said attestation is in due form.
Page 290 - Delivery to a third person for the use of the party in whose favour the deed is executed, where the grantor parts with all control over the deed, makes the deed effectual from the instant of such delivery...
Page 270 - For it is not to be presumed that the Legislature intended to make any innovation upon the Common Law further than the case absolutely required.
Page 53 - Every alteration which shall be made in the names of the partners, in the nature of the business, or in the capital or shares thereof, or in any other matter specified in the original certificate, shall be deemed a dissolution of the partnership ; and every such partnership which shall in any manner be carried on after any such alteration shall have been made, shall be deemed a general partnership, unless renewed as a special partnership according to the provisions of the last section.
Page 530 - But the rule of law is clear, that, where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to believe the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from averring against the latter a different state of things as existing at the same time."* In Freeman v.
Page 334 - ... the period fixed and prescribed by law for the creation of future estates and interests, and which is not destructible by the person for the time being entitled to the property subject to the future limitation except with the concurrence of the individual interested under that limitation.
Page 290 - ... he did not intend it to operate immediately, that it is a valid and effectual deed, and that delivery to the party who is to take by it, or to any person for his use, is not essential.
Page 90 - A will is ambulatory till the death of the testator. If the testator lets it stand till he dies, it is his will: if he does not suffer it to do so, it is not his will. Here, he had two. He has cancelled the second : it has no effect, no operation ; it is as no will at all, being cancelled before his death. But the former, which was never cancelled, stands as his will.