4. Surety; conditions; sufficiency of compliance. The mere fact that the examination, if made by a reasonably com- In re Mueller, 135 Fed. Rep. 711, approved in Matter of Loving, 183. CASES DISTINGUISHED. Ceballos & Co. v. United States, 214 U. S. 47, distinguished in United Tiger v. Western Investment Co., 221 U. S. 286, distinguished in Choate United States v. Tyler, 105 U. S. 44, distinguished in Plummer v. CASES EXPLAINED. West v. Kansas Natural Gas Co., 221 U. S. 229, explained in Haskell v. CASES FOLLOWED. Apache County v. Barth, 177 U. S. 538, followed in Gonzales v. Buist, Bement v. National Harrow Co., 186 U. S. 70, followed in Henry v. Binns v. United States, 194 U. S. 486, followed in Interstate Com. Chapman v. Bowen, 207 U. S. 89, followed in J. W. Calnan Co. v. Choate v. Trapp, 224 U. S. 665, followed in Gleason v. Wood, 679; English v. Richardson, 680. Excelsior Water Power Co. v. Pacific Bridge Co., 185 U. S. 282, fol- Ex parte Harding, 219 U. S. 363, followed in Interstate Com. Comm. v. Glenn v. Fant, 134 U. S. 398, followed in Gonzales v. Buist, 126. Goat v. United States, 224 U. S. 458, followed in Deming Investment Heckman v. United States, 224 U. S. 413, followed in Goat v. United Helm v. Zarecor, 222 U. S. 32, followed in Sharpe v. Bonham, 241. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Mottley, 219 U. S. 467, followed in Minnesota v. Hitchcock, 185 U. S. 373, followed in Heckman v. United Paper Bag Patent Case, 210 U. S. 405, followed in Henry v. A. B. Dick Rassmussen v. United States, 197 U. S. 516, followed in Interstate Com. Second Employers' Liability Cases, 223 U. S. 1, followed in Philadelphia, Southern Railway Co. v. Allison, 190 U. S. 326, followed in Missouri Standard Oil Co. v. Tennessee, 217 U. S. 420, followed in Standard Oil Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 221 U. S. 1, followed in United States Steamer Coquitlam, 163 U. S. 346, followed in Interstate Com. Comm. Tefft v. Munsuri, 222 U. S. 114, followed in J. W. Calnan Co. v. Texas & New Orleans R. R. Co. v. Miller, 221 U. S. 408, followed in Tiger v. Western Investment Co., 221 U. S. 286, followed in Heckman Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 111, followed in Standard Oil Co. v. United States v. Amèrican Bell Telephone Co., 128 U. S. 315, followed in Heckman v. United States, 413. United States v. American Tobacco Co., 221 U. S. 106, followed in United States v. Ames, 99 U. S. 35, followed in Interstate Com. Comm. United States v. Berdan Fire Arms Co., 156 U. S. 552, followed in United States v. New York Indians, 173 U. S. 464, followed in United Western Union Tel. Co. v. Penna. R. R. Co., 195 U. S. 540, followed in Wheeler v. Nesbit, 24 How. 544, followed in Brown v. Selfridge, 189. Yates v. Jones National Bank, 206 U. S. 158, followed in Thomas v. Young v. Amy. 171 U. S. 179, followed in Gonzales v. Buist, 126. CERTIFICATE. See APPEAL AND ERROR, 1; PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE, 3. CHATTEL MORTGAGES. See BANKRUPTCY, 5, 6. CHEROKEE INDIANS. CHICKASAW INDIANS. CHOCTAW INDIANS. See INDIANS, 5, 20. CITIZENSHIP. See CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 8; CORPORATIONS, 1; INDIANS, 2. CLAIMS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES. COMBINATIONS IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE. COMMERCE. See CONGRESS, POWERS OF, 2; INTERSTATE COMMERCE; SAFETY APPLIANCE ACTS. 1. Delegation of power; requiring commission to apply rules prescribed down general rules of action under which a commission may pro- 2. Over commerce, interstate and territorial; effect of existing contracts on 3. Indians; destruction of rights acquired under statute or agreement. dividual rights of property acquired under a former statute or 4. Indians; authorization of suit to maintain restrictions upon alienation the statutory restrictions upon alienation of Indian allottee lands. 5. Same. Where Congress has power to authorize the Government to sue, an 6. To insure efficacy of liability imposed. See ARMY AND Navy, 3; EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY INDIANS, 3, 4, 8, 13, 15; CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. Commerce clause. See Infra, 24 1. Contract clause; franchise of corporation as contract which cannot be While franchises to be are not transferable without express authority, |