United States Supreme Court Reports, Volume 50Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1926 Complete with headnotes, summaries of decisions, statements of cases, points and authorities of counsel, annotations, tables, and parallel references. |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
14th Amendment action affirmed alleged appellee applied argued the cause Asso authority bill chap Chicago circuit court citizens claim Congress Constitution construction contract corporation County court of appeals court of equity decided decision decree deed defendant in error district due process equity ex rel fact Federal question filed a brief franchise grant ground habeas corpus held Illinois judgment jurisdiction jury Justice land legislature Marcus Daly ment Messrs mortgage Ohio opinion ordinance owner P. R. Co pany parties patent payment person petition petitioner plaintiff in error probate proceedings process of law purchase purpose railroad company S. C. Reporter's South Carolina Stat statute street suit supra supreme court taxation thereof tion tract trial trust U. S. Comp United valid Wall writ of error York York ex rel
Popular passages
Page 94 - If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States in any manner or for any purpose...
Page 180 - ... no civil suit shall be brought before either of said courts against any person by any original process or proceeding in any other district than that whereof he is an inhabitant, but where the jurisdiction is founded only on the fact that the action is between citizens of different States, suit shall be brought only in the district of the residence of either the plaintiff or the defendant...
Page 192 - Property does become clothed with a public interest when used in a manner to make it of public consequence, and affect the community at large. When, therefore, one devotes his property to a use in which the public has an interest, he, in effect, grants to the public an interest in that use, and must submit to be controlled by the public for the common good, to the extent of the interest he has thus created.
Page 223 - ... he has not, directly or indirectly, made any agreement or contract in any way or manner with any person or persons whatsoever, by which the title which he might acquire from the Government of the United States should inure in whole or in part to the benefit of any person except himself...
Page 451 - And when in any suit mentioned in this section there shall be a controversy which is wholly between citizens of different states, and which can be fully determined as between them, then either one or more of the defendants actually interested in such controversy may remove said suit into the circuit court of the United States for the proper district.
Page 485 - But where the second action between the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered.
Page 294 - That no person shall be held to answer for a criminal offense without due process of law; and no person for the same offense shall be twice put in jeopardy of punishment, nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.
Page 153 - The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities ; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state.
Page 67 - But no law shall ^ -authorize the construction or operation of a street railroad except upon the condition that the consent of the owners of one-half in value of the property bounded on, and the consent also of the local authorities having the control of, that portion of a street or highway upon which it is proposed to construct or operate such railroad be first obtained...
Page 186 - ... may be removed into the circuit court of the United States for the proper district by the defendant or defendants therein, being nonresidents of that state.