...if the interest of the intttred be other than unconditional and mle ownership ; or if the subject of insurance be a building on ground not owned by the insured in fee-simple." Ordway v. Chace. At the date of the policy the only interest of Chace in the premises...

...* the interest of the insured be other than unconditional and sole ownership, or if the subject of insurance be a building on ground not owned by the insured in fee simple." It is not disputed that plaintiff had bought and paid for the building covered by the policy; and it...

...otherwise provided by agreement indorsed hereon, or added hereto, shall be void * * * if the subject of insurance be a building on ground not owned by the insured in fee simple. " It is an admitted fact in this case that plaintiff never owned the ground upon which the buildings...

...ownership to validate a fire-insurance policy which provides that it shall be void if the subject of insurance be a building on ground not owned by the insured in fee simple. 4. SAME — FORFEITURE OF POLICY — OCCUPANCY OF BUILDING. Where, in an action on a fire-insurance...

...by a chattel mortgage, unless otherwise provided by agreement indorsed upon or added to the policy, or if any change other than by the death of the insured takes place in the interest, title, or possession, whether by legal process or judgment, or by the...

...shall be void * * * if the interest of the insured be other than unconditional and sole ownership * * * or if any change, other than by the death of the insured, takes place in interest, title or possession of the subject of insurance (except change of occupants...

...if the interest of the insured be other than unconditional or sole ownership, or if the subject of insurance be a building on ground not owned by the insured in fee simple." The undisputed facts are that plaintiff purchased the lot for $300 from MA Hasten, and paid him one...

...interest of the insured be other than unconditional and sole ownership" and (6) "if the subject of insurance be a building on ground not owned by the insured in fee simple." It is well settled that forfeitures are not favored by the Courts. It is also settled that a contract...

...otherwise provided by agreement endorsed hereon or added hereto, shall be void * * * if the subject of insurance be a building on ground not owned by the insured in fee simple." The plaintiff's amended petition alleged the fact as to plaintiff's title, a leasehold, set forth the...

...— Does not apply to lumber in building, ivhen — Another clause avoids the policy, "if the subject of the insurance be a building on ground not owned by the assured in fee-simple." The building was upon the ground described in the policy, but the fee-simple...