Reports of Cases Heard and Determined in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Volume 111 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 39
... February , 1906 . HUGH H. SENIOR , Appellant , v . NEW YORK CITY RAILWAY COMPANY , Respondent . First Department , February 9 , 1906 . Street surface railways - ownership by one corporation of majority of stock of another corporation ...
... February , 1906 . HUGH H. SENIOR , Appellant , v . NEW YORK CITY RAILWAY COMPANY , Respondent . First Department , February 9 , 1906 . Street surface railways - ownership by one corporation of majority of stock of another corporation ...
Page 43
... February , 1906 . time of the issuance of these bonds , was the owner of this stock , but under the mortgage the Third Avenue Railroad Company had reserved the right to vote on this stock at the election of the directors of the company ...
... February , 1906 . time of the issuance of these bonds , was the owner of this stock , but under the mortgage the Third Avenue Railroad Company had reserved the right to vote on this stock at the election of the directors of the company ...
Page 45
... February , 1906 . the defendant did not ask or receive any fare for transporting the plaintiff over the Forty - second street line . * * Section 101 of the Railroad Law ( as amd . supra ) provides that " No corporation constructing and ...
... February , 1906 . the defendant did not ask or receive any fare for transporting the plaintiff over the Forty - second street line . * * Section 101 of the Railroad Law ( as amd . supra ) provides that " No corporation constructing and ...
Page 46
... February , 1906 . [ Vol . 111 . control of the operation of the specific railroad sought to be brought within the provisions of the act , and not to the indirect control over a corporation which owns the road by its stockholders . Each ...
... February , 1906 . [ Vol . 111 . control of the operation of the specific railroad sought to be brought within the provisions of the act , and not to the indirect control over a corporation which owns the road by its stockholders . Each ...
Page 49
... February , 1906 . 721 ) the court was construing a public statute . There , as in the case at bar , the subsidiary companies had complete organizations and kept up completely their separate entities . The Circuit Court said : " It will ...
... February , 1906 . 721 ) the court was construing a public statute . There , as in the case at bar , the subsidiary companies had complete organizations and kept up completely their separate entities . The Circuit Court said : " It will ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affd agreement alleged appellant assignment attorney authority beneficiary cause of action certificate chap charge Civil Procedure claim clerk Code of Civil commissioner complaint concurred contract corporation costs and disbursements counsel Court in favor damages death deceased defendant defendant's demurrer denied dollars costs entered entitled evidence ex rel executors fact February Fourth Department Gaynor granted Hirschberg Impleaded intestate issue January Jenks Judgment and order jury Kings County liable Little Neck bay March March 9 Matter ment mortgage motion negligence North Hempstead opinion owner paid parties payment person plaintiff premises proceedings question Railroad Company real property received recover Respondent reversed Rich and Miller rule Second Department Smith Special Term statute stockholders street Supreme Court Surrogate's Court testator testatrix testified testimony thereof Third Department tion town of Hempstead trial trust verdict York