Reports of Cases Heard and Determined in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Volume 111 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
... his services . So that if he had any such knowledge Mrs. Ames , would not be bound thereby . Even as to the claim that the attorney had any such knowledge there was a App . Div . ] Third Department , January , C FLANDERS V. ROSOFF . 2.
... his services . So that if he had any such knowledge Mrs. Ames , would not be bound thereby . Even as to the claim that the attorney had any such knowledge there was a App . Div . ] Third Department , January , C FLANDERS V. ROSOFF . 2.
Page 9
... claim of the appellant in this respect is that whatever he did was for a number of people interested in the racetrack , and that in what he did he was not acting for himself alone , and that plaintiff knew this . The court charged the ...
... claim of the appellant in this respect is that whatever he did was for a number of people interested in the racetrack , and that in what he did he was not acting for himself alone , and that plaintiff knew this . The court charged the ...
Page 28
... claim , the attorney who appears for a party has a lien upon his client's cause of action , claim or counterclaim , which attaches to a verdict , report , decision , judgment or final order in his client's favor and the proceeds thereof ...
... claim , the attorney who appears for a party has a lien upon his client's cause of action , claim or counterclaim , which attaches to a verdict , report , decision , judgment or final order in his client's favor and the proceeds thereof ...
Page 34
... claim that the action and deter- mination of the State Commissioner of Excise in making said enu- meration and certifying the same to the county treasurer of the county of Schenectady was illegal , and they asked that the same inay be ...
... claim that the action and deter- mination of the State Commissioner of Excise in making said enu- meration and certifying the same to the county treasurer of the county of Schenectady was illegal , and they asked that the same inay be ...
Page 35
... claim heard and determined by the Court of Claims . We con- clude that the directions of the State Commissioner of ... claim against estate be determined by surrogate - when action on claim barred by such consent . When a claimant ...
... claim heard and determined by the Court of Claims . We con- clude that the directions of the State Commissioner of ... claim against estate be determined by surrogate - when action on claim barred by such consent . When a claimant ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affd agreement alleged appellant assignment attorney authority beneficiary cause of action certificate chap charge Civil Procedure claim clerk Code of Civil commissioner complaint concurred contract corporation costs and disbursements counsel Court in favor damages death deceased defendant defendant's demurrer denied dollars costs entered entitled evidence ex rel executors fact February Fourth Department Gaynor granted Hirschberg Impleaded intestate issue January Jenks Judgment and order jury Kings County liable Little Neck bay March March 9 Matter ment mortgage motion negligence North Hempstead opinion owner paid parties payment person plaintiff premises proceedings question Railroad Company real property received recover Respondent reversed Rich and Miller rule Second Department Smith Special Term statute stockholders street Supreme Court Surrogate's Court testator testatrix testified testimony thereof Third Department tion town of Hempstead trial trust verdict York