Reports of Cases Heard and Determined in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Volume 111 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 10
... defendant in fact employed the plaintiff and that he had no authority to bind anybody else , then the jury might find the defendant personally liable ; also , that if defendant employed plaintiff without disclosing his agency they might ...
... defendant in fact employed the plaintiff and that he had no authority to bind anybody else , then the jury might find the defendant personally liable ; also , that if defendant employed plaintiff without disclosing his agency they might ...
Page 42
... defendant , and this stock was thus held prior to the commencement of the action . On behalf of the defendant the president of the Forty - second Street Company was called as a witness and testified that he had been president of the ...
... defendant , and this stock was thus held prior to the commencement of the action . On behalf of the defendant the president of the Forty - second Street Company was called as a witness and testified that he had been president of the ...
Page 43
... defendant had the right to vote upon a large majority of the stock of the Forty - second Street Company and thus ... defendant road . The Forty - second street road had secured no advantage because of the acquisition by the defendant of ...
... defendant had the right to vote upon a large majority of the stock of the Forty - second Street Company and thus ... defendant road . The Forty - second street road had secured no advantage because of the acquisition by the defendant of ...
Page 51
... defendant Shirmer on certain property in the city of New York owned by the defendant Hand . The plaintiff testified that he met Shirmer in the month of June , 1904 , and told him that as the first mortgages on the lots at Baychester and ...
... defendant Shirmer on certain property in the city of New York owned by the defendant Hand . The plaintiff testified that he met Shirmer in the month of June , 1904 , and told him that as the first mortgages on the lots at Baychester and ...
Page 54
... defendant Shirmer learned that the aforesaid representations made by the plaintiff were not true , the defendant Shiriner , believing the said representations to be true , was induced to modify said agreement and to substitute a satis ...
... defendant Shirmer learned that the aforesaid representations made by the plaintiff were not true , the defendant Shiriner , believing the said representations to be true , was induced to modify said agreement and to substitute a satis ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affd agreement alleged appellant assignment attorney authority beneficiary cause of action certificate chap charge Civil Procedure claim clerk Code of Civil commissioner complaint concurred contract corporation costs and disbursements counsel Court in favor damages death deceased defendant defendant's demurrer denied dollars costs entered entitled evidence ex rel executors fact February Fourth Department Gaynor granted Hirschberg Impleaded intestate issue January Jenks Judgment and order jury Kings County liable Little Neck bay March March 9 Matter ment mortgage motion negligence North Hempstead opinion owner paid parties payment person plaintiff premises proceedings question Railroad Company real property received recover Respondent reversed Rich and Miller rule Second Department Smith Special Term statute stockholders street Supreme Court Surrogate's Court testator testatrix testified testimony thereof Third Department tion town of Hempstead trial trust verdict York