Reports of Cases Heard and Determined in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Volume 111 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 99
Page 5
... duty to have stopped . APPEAL by the defendant , the Fonda , Johnstown and Glovers- ville Railroad Company , from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff , entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Montgomery ...
... duty to have stopped . APPEAL by the defendant , the Fonda , Johnstown and Glovers- ville Railroad Company , from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff , entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Montgomery ...
Page 8
... duty of the motorman to exercise reasonable care in approaching the highway crossing , his negligence does not excuse the contributory negligence of the plaintiff The verdict of the jury upon the question of the plaintiff's con ...
... duty of the motorman to exercise reasonable care in approaching the highway crossing , his negligence does not excuse the contributory negligence of the plaintiff The verdict of the jury upon the question of the plaintiff's con ...
Page 38
... duty and so protect the claimant against unnecessary and unlimited delay . We conclude that the defenses demurred to are fatal , if estab- lished , to plaintiff's right to maintain this action . All concurred ; NASH , J. , not sitting ...
... duty and so protect the claimant against unnecessary and unlimited delay . We conclude that the defenses demurred to are fatal , if estab- lished , to plaintiff's right to maintain this action . All concurred ; NASH , J. , not sitting ...
Page 43
... duty imposed upon it by law . The refusal of the officers and employees of the Forty - second street road to permit the plaintiff to ride upon its line without paying the legal fare was not the vio- lation of a duty imposed upon the ...
... duty imposed upon it by law . The refusal of the officers and employees of the Forty - second street road to permit the plaintiff to ride upon its line without paying the legal fare was not the vio- lation of a duty imposed upon the ...
Page 45
... duty , as distinguished from the control of a person who oper- ates the railroad . It would be quite absurd to speak of a person owning a majority of the stock of a corporation as being the owner of the property , or as controlling the ...
... duty , as distinguished from the control of a person who oper- ates the railroad . It would be quite absurd to speak of a person owning a majority of the stock of a corporation as being the owner of the property , or as controlling the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affd agreement alleged appellant assignment attorney authority beneficiary cause of action certificate chap charge Civil Procedure claim clerk Code of Civil commissioner complaint concurred contract corporation costs and disbursements counsel Court in favor damages death deceased defendant defendant's demurrer denied dollars costs entered entitled evidence ex rel executors fact February Fourth Department Gaynor granted Hirschberg Impleaded intestate issue January Jenks Judgment and order jury Kings County liable Little Neck bay March March 9 Matter ment mortgage motion negligence North Hempstead opinion owner paid parties payment person plaintiff premises proceedings question Railroad Company real property received recover Respondent reversed Rich and Miller rule Second Department Smith Special Term statute stockholders street Supreme Court Surrogate's Court testator testatrix testified testimony thereof Third Department tion town of Hempstead trial trust verdict York