Decisions of the Federal Maritime Board, and Maritime Administration, Department of Commerce, Volume 4U.S. Government Printing Office, 1963 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 1
... filed on March 13 , 1950 , and the amended complaint , filed on November 20 , 1950 , named Peter Bogaty and Hudson Shipping Co. , Inc. , respondents . Both complaints against Hudson Shipping Co. , Inc. , were dis- missed by separate ...
... filed on March 13 , 1950 , and the amended complaint , filed on November 20 , 1950 , named Peter Bogaty and Hudson Shipping Co. , Inc. , respondents . Both complaints against Hudson Shipping Co. , Inc. , were dis- missed by separate ...
Page 3
... filed by complainant and the case was submitted on complainant's brief without oral argument on January 30 , 1952 . The Board on February 27 , 1952 , entered an order pointing out that complainant had failed to deliver to the examiner ...
... filed by complainant and the case was submitted on complainant's brief without oral argument on January 30 , 1952 . The Board on February 27 , 1952 , entered an order pointing out that complainant had failed to deliver to the examiner ...
Page 8
... filed on June 27 , 1949 , and the application of Pacific Far East Line , Inc. , filed on October 12 , 1949 , for operating - differential sub- sidies under Title VI of the Merchant Marine Act , 1936 , as amended , both applicants ...
... filed on June 27 , 1949 , and the application of Pacific Far East Line , Inc. , filed on October 12 , 1949 , for operating - differential sub- sidies under Title VI of the Merchant Marine Act , 1936 , as amended , both applicants ...
Page 10
... filed to the examiner's recommended decision by PFEL , APL , States , and AML . PTL filed a memorandum sub- stantially in support of , but partially in exception to , the examiner's recommended decision . Oral argument on exceptions was ...
... filed to the examiner's recommended decision by PFEL , APL , States , and AML . PTL filed a memorandum sub- stantially in support of , but partially in exception to , the examiner's recommended decision . Oral argument on exceptions was ...
Page 22
... filed an answer in opposition to the motion , and the matter was argued before the Board on February 14 , 1952 . Farrell alleges that the Maritime Commission entered into a formal operating - differential subsidy contract with it ...
... filed an answer in opposition to the motion , and the matter was argued before the Board on February 14 , 1952 . Farrell alleges that the Maritime Commission entered into a formal operating - differential subsidy contract with it ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
A. J. WILLIAMS additional Alaska amended American Export Lines American President Lines APL's application approval cargo carried charges charter Coastwise combination vessels commodities common carrier complainant conference rates construction cost determine differential dual-rate system effect estimate evidence Export Fabre FEDERAL MARITIME BOARD filed foreign commerce foreign-flag competition foreign-flag vessels freight Grace Line granted Guam hearing hereinafter inbound intercoastal Isbrandtsen Isbrandtsen Company issues January Johnson Line liner long tons Lykes Maritime Administrator Maritime Commission ment Merchant Marine Act Mississippi Netherlands nonconference operating-differential subsidy outbound passenger percent PFEL Philippines proceeding proposed Public Counsel purposes and policy reasonable rebates recommended decision record respondent sailings section 15 shipments shippers Shipping Act Steamship Company subsidy agreement subsidy contract substantial tariff testified tion tons Trade Route traffic transportation unfair United States-flag unjustly discriminatory violation of section voyage War-Built Waterman wood pulp York
Popular passages
Page 31 - ... recommend a decision, except that in rule making or determining applications for initial licenses — (1...
Page 862 - States shall have a merchant marine (a) sufficient to carry its domestic water-borne commerce and a substantial portion of the water-borne export and import foreign commerce of the United States and to provide shipping service on all routes essential for maintaining the flow of such domestic and foreign water-borne commerce at all times...
Page 731 - ... like and contemporaneous service in the transportation of a like kind of traffic under substantially similar circumstances and conditions, such common carrier shall be deemed guilty of unjust discrimination, which is hereby prohibited and declared to be unlawful.
Page 536 - That it shall be unlawful for any common carrier subject to the provisions of this act to make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any particular person, company, firm, corporation, or locality, or any particular description of traffic, in any respect whatsoever...
Page 701 - ... allotting ports or restricting or otherwise regulating the number and character of sailings between ports; limiting or regulating in any way the volume or character of freight or passenger traffic to be carried; or in any manner providing for an exclusive, preferential, or co-operative working arrangement. The term "agreement" in this section includes understandings, conferences, and other arrangements.
Page 536 - That no common carrier by water in foreign commerce shall demand, charge, or collect any rate, fare, or charge which is unjustly discriminatory between shippers or ports, or unjustly prejudicial to exporters of the United States as compared with their foreign competitors.
Page 95 - States and to provide shipping service on all routes essential for maintaining the flow of such domestic and foreign waterborne commerce at all times, (b) capable of serving as a naval and military auxiliary in time of war or national emergency...
Page 731 - That nothing in this Act shall prevent the carriage, storage, or handling of property free or at reduced rates for the United States, State, or municipal governments...
Page 697 - All agreements, modifications, or cancellations made after the organization of the board shall be lawful only when and as long as approved by the board, and before approval or after disapproval It shall be unlawful to carry out in whole or In part, directly or indirectly, any such agreement, modification, or cancellation. Every agreement, modification, or cancellation lawful under this section shall be excepted from the provisions of the Act approved July second, eighteen hundred and ninety, entitled...
Page 444 - Any person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden by this section may sue therefor in any district court of the United States...