Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsUniversitetsforlaget, 1976 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 30
Page 102
... asked to be dean . Consider the following four criteria for " nearness " : ( a ) Has the candidate earlier been approached about the possibility of being a faculty member of the school ? Nine out of the ten people asked to be dean , 6 ...
... asked to be dean . Consider the following four criteria for " nearness " : ( a ) Has the candidate earlier been approached about the possibility of being a faculty member of the school ? Nine out of the ten people asked to be dean , 6 ...
Page 114
... asked to be dean , a sample of the " active " and " passive " candidates along with some people not discussed at all as candidates in the search committee . Each respondent was asked whom he would accept as a dean immediately from this ...
... asked to be dean , a sample of the " active " and " passive " candidates along with some people not discussed at all as candidates in the search committee . Each respondent was asked whom he would accept as a dean immediately from this ...
Page 137
... asked to be dean ) , the " active " and the " passive " candidates , ( Olsen , 1970 , pp . 55 and 56 ) . If we defined " know " as only " high knowledge " ( notes 12 and 13 ) the differences among the committee members will increase ...
... asked to be dean ) , the " active " and the " passive " candidates , ( Olsen , 1970 , pp . 55 and 56 ) . If we defined " know " as only " high knowledge " ( notes 12 and 13 ) the differences among the committee members will increase ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Introduction | 54 |
Copyright | |
17 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade teacher academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity architecture arena assembly attention attitudes August 27 behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations College concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making demands desegregation discussion District educational effects energy expect faculty members formal participation full professors garbage garbage can model goals hierarchical house meeting ideology implementation important individual interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway Norwegian November 25 observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organization organizational choices outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenured theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo variables Vice-Chancellor vote