Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsUniversitetsforlaget, 1976 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 10
Page 187
... criticized the resistance of informal agreements to change . The criticism sometimes misses the point . The outcomes of bilateral negotiation between faculty and students are little affected by policy proclamations by presidents or ...
... criticized the resistance of informal agreements to change . The criticism sometimes misses the point . The outcomes of bilateral negotiation between faculty and students are little affected by policy proclamations by presidents or ...
Page 334
... criticism raised through several publications of the Organization for Economic Co - Operation and Development ( OECD ) . Here the European institute - organization dominated by one professor was attacked as outdated . The American ...
... criticism raised through several publications of the Organization for Economic Co - Operation and Development ( OECD ) . Here the European institute - organization dominated by one professor was attacked as outdated . The American ...
Page 357
... criticized for not saying what they want . The teachers , on their part , criticize the parents for the same thing . A parent sug- gests that the house meeting make a decision on the priority of the educational goals of the school . He ...
... criticized for not saying what they want . The teachers , on their part , criticize the parents for the same thing . A parent sug- gests that the house meeting make a decision on the priority of the educational goals of the school . He ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Introduction | 54 |
Copyright | |
17 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade accepted action active administrative alternative assembly associate assume attention attitudes become behavior beliefs Board candidates chairman choice opportunities clear College completely concerns consider consistent deadline dean decided decision demands discussion District educational effects energy established existing expect fact faculty faculty members flow formal four garbage give given goals governance grade house meeting ideas important increase indicate individual interest interpretation involved issues leaders less major March non-leaders observed organization organizational outcomes parents participation particular perceived period persons physics political position possible present problems procedures produced professional professors proposal question rational reasons relatively reorganization response result school committee situation social solutions strong structure suggest Table teachers theory tion Tromsø values vote