Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsUniversitetsforlaget, 1976 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 29
Page 264
... decided to establish a group of small , ad hoc floor management teams to guide the ESC recommendations through the Assembly . The first two of these teams were appointed on January 9 , 1969 ; but neither was concerned with the issue of ...
... decided to establish a group of small , ad hoc floor management teams to guide the ESC recommendations through the Assembly . The first two of these teams were appointed on January 9 , 1969 ; but neither was concerned with the issue of ...
Page 355
... decided to rehire a teacher who had been fired by the group of teachers . Although these decisions were decided by vote after considerable discussion , none of them were implemented . The school did not proceed to build a new classroom ...
... decided to rehire a teacher who had been fired by the group of teachers . Although these decisions were decided by vote after considerable discussion , none of them were implemented . The school did not proceed to build a new classroom ...
Page 356
... decided to restructure the school . In January it was decided to " re - hire " a teacher who had been excluded in the end of November by the teacher group . In order to understand the decision making at the house meetings , we also ...
... decided to restructure the school . In January it was decided to " re - hire " a teacher who had been excluded in the end of November by the teacher group . In order to understand the decision making at the house meetings , we also ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Introduction | 54 |
Copyright | |
17 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade accepted action active administrative alternative assembly associate assume attention attitudes become behavior beliefs Board candidates chairman choice opportunities clear College completely concerns consider consistent deadline dean decided decision demands discussion District educational effects energy established existing expect fact faculty faculty members flow formal four garbage give given goals governance grade house meeting ideas important increase indicate individual interest interpretation involved issues leaders less major March non-leaders observed organization organizational outcomes parents participation particular perceived period persons physics political position possible present problems procedures produced professional professors proposal question rational reasons relatively reorganization response result school committee situation social solutions strong structure suggest Table teachers theory tion Tromsø values vote