Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsUniversitetsforlaget, 1976 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 81
Page 96
... discussion . First meeting of the search committee ( appointed by the Vice - Chancellor ) . The search committee meets . Proposal for building a list of candidates and discussion about how to approach candidates . A candidate visits the ...
... discussion . First meeting of the search committee ( appointed by the Vice - Chancellor ) . The search committee meets . Proposal for building a list of candidates and discussion about how to approach candidates . A candidate visits the ...
Page 163
... discussion , no agreement on whether to discuss goals or structure 3 ) group discussion . The groups can decide themselves what to discuss 4 ) School board demands final decision on their proposal . Many objections . The school board ...
... discussion , no agreement on whether to discuss goals or structure 3 ) group discussion . The groups can decide themselves what to discuss 4 ) School board demands final decision on their proposal . Many objections . The school board ...
Page 172
... discussion was also the chairman of a committee , the task of which was to provide more space for the school . The architect , projected a building which consisted of only one big room , not very suitable for a workshop structure . This ...
... discussion was also the chairman of a committee , the task of which was to provide more space for the school . The architect , projected a building which consisted of only one big room , not very suitable for a workshop structure . This ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Introduction | 54 |
Copyright | |
17 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade accepted action active administrative alternative assembly associate assume attention attitudes become behavior beliefs Board candidates chairman choice opportunities clear College completely concerns consider consistent deadline dean decided decision demands discussion District educational effects energy established existing expect fact faculty faculty members flow formal four garbage give given goals governance grade house meeting ideas important increase indicate individual interest interpretation involved issues leaders less major March non-leaders observed organization organizational outcomes parents participation particular perceived period persons physics political position possible present problems procedures produced professional professors proposal question rational reasons relatively reorganization response result school committee situation social solutions strong structure suggest Table teachers theory tion Tromsø values vote