Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsUniversitetsforlaget, 1976 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 3
Page 191
... dollars by paying present dollars . Seventh , the president has no basis for believing that his judgment is better than the process . Moreover , even if he believes he knows better , he knows that he has no good way to demonstrate the ...
... dollars by paying present dollars . Seventh , the president has no basis for believing that his judgment is better than the process . Moreover , even if he believes he knows better , he knows that he has no good way to demonstrate the ...
Page 293
... dollars ) . The university is allowed a certain amount of self government . However , several major issues are not internal choices of the university . With the exception of the fields of medicine and dental medicine the university has ...
... dollars ) . The university is allowed a certain amount of self government . However , several major issues are not internal choices of the university . With the exception of the fields of medicine and dental medicine the university has ...
Page 400
... Dollar , New York : McGraw - Hill , Carnegie Commission on the Future of Higher Education , 1971 . Mosher , Frederick ( ed . ) . " Government Reorganizations , Cases and Commentary " , The Inter - University Case Program , Indianapolis ...
... Dollar , New York : McGraw - Hill , Carnegie Commission on the Future of Higher Education , 1971 . Mosher , Frederick ( ed . ) . " Government Reorganizations , Cases and Commentary " , The Inter - University Case Program , Indianapolis ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Introduction | 54 |
Copyright | |
17 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade teacher academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity architecture arena assembly attention attitudes August 27 behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations College concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making demands desegregation discussion District educational effects energy expect faculty members formal participation full professors garbage garbage can model goals hierarchical house meeting ideology implementation important individual interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway Norwegian November 25 observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organization organizational choices outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenured theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo variables Vice-Chancellor vote