Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsUniversitetsforlaget, 1976 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 39
Page 42
... example , by individual decision ) ? If there are to be rules , what justifies one set of rules rather than another ? Since our present interest is not in political philosophy , per se , but in understanding organiza- tional behavior ...
... example , by individual decision ) ? If there are to be rules , what justifies one set of rules rather than another ? Since our present interest is not in political philosophy , per se , but in understanding organiza- tional behavior ...
Page 60
... example , what are the incentives for an evaluator of a social experiment to find it a success ? Or a failure ? Third , some ideas about belief structure , The development of beliefs under conditions of ambiguity probably accentuates ...
... example , what are the incentives for an evaluator of a social experiment to find it a success ? Or a failure ? Third , some ideas about belief structure , The development of beliefs under conditions of ambiguity probably accentuates ...
Page 187
... example at Berkeley and San Francisco State College ) from widespread shifts in faculty and student attitudes . These shifts lead to direct renegotiations at the classroom and department levels that collectively modify the nature of the ...
... example at Berkeley and San Francisco State College ) from widespread shifts in faculty and student attitudes . These shifts lead to direct renegotiations at the classroom and department levels that collectively modify the nature of the ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Introduction | 54 |
Copyright | |
17 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade teacher academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity architecture arena assembly attention attitudes August 27 behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations College concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making demands desegregation discussion District educational effects energy expect faculty members formal participation full professors garbage garbage can model goals hierarchical house meeting ideology implementation important individual interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway Norwegian November 25 observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organization organizational choices outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenured theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo variables Vice-Chancellor vote