Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 75
Page 138
In principle we may also argue that these numbers are reflecting a situation
where five candidates are given , where all the candidates would be said to be
interdisciplinary oriented and where the differences in interdisciplinarity would
not be ...
In principle we may also argue that these numbers are reflecting a situation
where five candidates are given , where all the candidates would be said to be
interdisciplinary oriented and where the differences in interdisciplinarity would
not be ...
Page 209
They are neutral in the sense that the necessary value premises for the decisions
are given or treated as given . If the decision - makers have to establish the value
premises themselves , they usually resort to generally accepted values ( e . g .
They are neutral in the sense that the necessary value premises for the decisions
are given or treated as given . If the decision - makers have to establish the value
premises themselves , they usually resort to generally accepted values ( e . g .
Page 226
However , when one observes the actual operation of organizations it becomes
evident that organizational environments are not always indifferent as to whether
organizations reach a given decision or resolve certain problems .
However , when one observes the actual operation of organizations it becomes
evident that organizational environments are not always indifferent as to whether
organizations reach a given decision or resolve certain problems .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Acknowledgments | 7 |
Organizational Learning and the Ambiguity of the Past | 54 |
The Technology of Foolishness | 69 |
Copyright | |
11 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations James G. March,Johan P. Olsen,Søren Christensen Snippet view - 1979 |
Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations James G. March,Johan P. Olsen,Søren Christensen Snippet view - 1979 |
Common terms and phrases
academic accepted action active administrative affect allocation alternative ambiguity assembly associated assume attention become behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunity clear committee completely concerns connection consider consistent dean decision definition demands discussion District energy established existing expect fact faculty faculty members flow formal four garbage given goals governance grade ideas important increase individual institutions interest interpretation involved issues leaders less major March means meeting observed organization organizational outcomes parents participants particular perceived period person political position possible preferences present presidents problems procedures produce professional professors proposal question rational reason relatively represented require response result rules situation social solutions strong structure suggest Table teachers theory tion Tromsø understanding values