Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsUniversitetsforlaget, 1976 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 4
Page 31
... handle successfully . Decision - makers use their energy in areas in which they have success , or about which they have concern , or in which they find pleasure . There is societal segmentation . Even the simplest societies order or ...
... handle successfully . Decision - makers use their energy in areas in which they have success , or about which they have concern , or in which they find pleasure . There is societal segmentation . Even the simplest societies order or ...
Page 246
... handle , then the participants actively undertake to eject some of the problems they had previously accepted . Thus , energy deficit calculations appear to be essential elements of the garbage ejection process under deadline conditions ...
... handle , then the participants actively undertake to eject some of the problems they had previously accepted . Thus , energy deficit calculations appear to be essential elements of the garbage ejection process under deadline conditions ...
Page 317
... handle and very time - consuming . ( c ) The department had a strong need for making joint decisions . Projects had become very expensive . When one group got money , all the others were affected . Thus , the department needed an ...
... handle and very time - consuming . ( c ) The department had a strong need for making joint decisions . Projects had become very expensive . When one group got money , all the others were affected . Thus , the department needed an ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Introduction | 54 |
Copyright | |
17 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade accepted action active administrative alternative assembly associate assume attention attitudes become behavior beliefs Board candidates chairman choice opportunities clear College completely concerns consider consistent deadline dean decided decision demands discussion District educational effects energy established existing expect fact faculty faculty members flow formal four garbage give given goals governance grade house meeting ideas important increase indicate individual interest interpretation involved issues leaders less major March non-leaders observed organization organizational outcomes parents participation particular perceived period persons physics political position possible present problems procedures produced professional professors proposal question rational reasons relatively reorganization response result school committee situation social solutions strong structure suggest Table teachers theory tion Tromsø values vote