Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsUniversitetsforlaget, 1976 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 80
Page 133
... involvement in university decision- making . Student leaders were already heavily involved in another choice opportunity - the firing of three assistant professors in another school on the campus . If the choice had become a matter of ...
... involvement in university decision- making . Student leaders were already heavily involved in another choice opportunity - the firing of three assistant professors in another school on the campus . If the choice had become a matter of ...
Page 230
... involved the enlargement of neighborhood school attendance areas and the initiation of localized bussing to integrate the schools in two sub - areas of the city , the Richmond and the Park - South . Only 20 percent of the city's ...
... involved the enlargement of neighborhood school attendance areas and the initiation of localized bussing to integrate the schools in two sub - areas of the city , the Richmond and the Park - South . Only 20 percent of the city's ...
Page 272
... involved ( perhaps over- lapping to some degree with some previous stages ) . The " stages " themselves are not predetermined . On the whole , it appears that the decision outcomes are produced by a sequence of locally understandable ...
... involved ( perhaps over- lapping to some degree with some previous stages ) . The " stages " themselves are not predetermined . On the whole , it appears that the decision outcomes are produced by a sequence of locally understandable ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Introduction | 54 |
Copyright | |
17 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade accepted action active administrative alternative assembly associate assume attention attitudes become behavior beliefs Board candidates chairman choice opportunities clear College completely concerns consider consistent deadline dean decided decision demands discussion District educational effects energy established existing expect fact faculty faculty members flow formal four garbage give given goals governance grade house meeting ideas important increase indicate individual interest interpretation involved issues leaders less major March non-leaders observed organization organizational outcomes parents participation particular perceived period persons physics political position possible present problems procedures produced professional professors proposal question rational reasons relatively reorganization response result school committee situation social solutions strong structure suggest Table teachers theory tion Tromsø values vote