Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsUniversitetsforlaget, 1976 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 11
Page 150
... once the decision was made . The outcome of the battle was important less for the immediate outcome that resulted than for the implications this outcome had for contemporary battles within other arenas or future battles involving the ...
... once the decision was made . The outcome of the battle was important less for the immediate outcome that resulted than for the implications this outcome had for contemporary battles within other arenas or future battles involving the ...
Page 230
... once so that such an order could be imple- mented . The District failed to respond to the Judge's request for an imme- diate beginning of desegregation planning . Four factors contributed to this lack of response : First , although the ...
... once so that such an order could be imple- mented . The District failed to respond to the Judge's request for an imme- diate beginning of desegregation planning . Four factors contributed to this lack of response : First , although the ...
Page 390
... once as being influential . Ninety - five of these answered the questionnaire . This group thus had a higher response rate than average for the population as a whole . In addition to a peer - rating score and a self - rating score ...
... once as being influential . Ninety - five of these answered the questionnaire . This group thus had a higher response rate than average for the population as a whole . In addition to a peer - rating score and a self - rating score ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Introduction | 54 |
Copyright | |
17 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade teacher academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity architecture arena assembly attention attitudes August 27 behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations College concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making demands desegregation discussion District educational effects energy expect faculty members formal participation full professors garbage garbage can model goals hierarchical house meeting ideology implementation important individual interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway Norwegian November 25 observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organization organizational choices outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenured theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo variables Vice-Chancellor vote