Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 60
Page 292
Our model suggests that if non - leaders ( in Cell III ) start perceiving
organizational choices as more important , perceive their alternatives as less
good , or their prospects for future leadership as declining , we move towards
Cell I . Likewise , if ...
Our model suggests that if non - leaders ( in Cell III ) start perceiving
organizational choices as more important , perceive their alternatives as less
good , or their prospects for future leadership as declining , we move towards
Cell I . Likewise , if ...
Page 297
03 The similarities in attitudes are not a result of a perceived equality in influence
. There are important differences in how the different groups perceive their own
influence upon the teaching and researchpolicies of the department . The higher
...
03 The similarities in attitudes are not a result of a perceived equality in influence
. There are important differences in how the different groups perceive their own
influence upon the teaching and researchpolicies of the department . The higher
...
Page 339
No major groups perceived themselves as alienate . The general level of trust
was high . There was no evident " opposition ” and “ establishment " defining the
patterns of interaction . The less positive relationships between the dean and the
...
No major groups perceived themselves as alienate . The general level of trust
was high . There was no evident " opposition ” and “ establishment " defining the
patterns of interaction . The less positive relationships between the dean and the
...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Acknowledgments | 7 |
Organizational Learning and the Ambiguity of the Past | 54 |
The Technology of Foolishness | 69 |
Copyright | |
11 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations James G. March,Johan P. Olsen,Søren Christensen Snippet view - 1979 |
Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations James G. March,Johan P. Olsen,Søren Christensen Snippet view - 1979 |
Common terms and phrases
academic accepted action active administrative affect allocation alternative ambiguity assembly associated assume attention become behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunity clear committee completely concerns connection consider consistent dean decision definition demands discussion District energy established existing expect fact faculty faculty members flow formal four garbage given goals governance grade ideas important increase individual institutions interest interpretation involved issues leaders less major March means meeting observed organization organizational outcomes parents participants particular perceived period person political position possible preferences present presidents problems procedures produce professional professors proposal question rational reason relatively represented require response result rules situation social solutions strong structure suggest Table teachers theory tion Tromsø understanding values