Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 21
Page 326
They perceived it as easier to have a formal representation of junior faculty
accepted in the Department of Physics than in most other places . In this way it
would be important to provide a model which could be used in future bargaining
in other ...
They perceived it as easier to have a formal representation of junior faculty
accepted in the Department of Physics than in most other places . In this way it
would be important to provide a model which could be used in future bargaining
in other ...
Page 328
The general interest in the symbols of participation , power , and status was
higher , and at the same time these issues were to a lesser degree than in
physics solved in informal ways ( attracting the students and junior faculty leaders
) .
The general interest in the symbols of participation , power , and status was
higher , and at the same time these issues were to a lesser degree than in
physics solved in informal ways ( attracting the students and junior faculty leaders
) .
Page 336
The reorganization process in physics also helped encourage the highest
governing body of the university ( The Collegium ) to attend to these issues . The
immediate impact of this body was insignificant , except for the important ) fact
that they ...
The reorganization process in physics also helped encourage the highest
governing body of the university ( The Collegium ) to attend to these issues . The
immediate impact of this body was insignificant , except for the important ) fact
that they ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Acknowledgments | 7 |
Organizational Learning and the Ambiguity of the Past | 54 |
The Technology of Foolishness | 69 |
Copyright | |
11 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations James G. March,Johan P. Olsen,Søren Christensen Snippet view - 1979 |
Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations James G. March,Johan P. Olsen,Søren Christensen Snippet view - 1979 |
Common terms and phrases
academic accepted action active administrative affect allocation alternative ambiguity assembly associated assume attention become behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunity clear committee completely concerns connection consider consistent dean decision definition demands discussion District energy established existing expect fact faculty faculty members flow formal four garbage given goals governance grade ideas important increase individual institutions interest interpretation involved issues leaders less major March means meeting observed organization organizational outcomes parents participants particular perceived period person political position possible preferences present presidents problems procedures produce professional professors proposal question rational reason relatively represented require response result rules situation social solutions strong structure suggest Table teachers theory tion Tromsø understanding values