Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 78
Page 28
If we have N potential participants and M classes of choices , then the decision
structure is an N - by - M array which shows for every possible participant the
choices in which he has a claim to participate ( See Cohen , March , and Olsen ,
1972 ) ...
If we have N potential participants and M classes of choices , then the decision
structure is an N - by - M array which shows for every possible participant the
choices in which he has a claim to participate ( See Cohen , March , and Olsen ,
1972 ) ...
Page 51
First , it is possible to buy attention . Very few people who can earn significant
amounts of money in an hour spend many hours beyond the demands of duty in
direct participation . They hire a representative . Second , it is possible to barter ...
First , it is possible to buy attention . Very few people who can earn significant
amounts of money in an hour spend many hours beyond the demands of duty in
direct participation . They hire a representative . Second , it is possible to barter ...
Page 381
For example , general cultural norms and values , professional training , and an
institutionalized public school system make it possible to define a socially shared
technology in public elementary schools in Denmark . The assessment of ...
For example , general cultural norms and values , professional training , and an
institutionalized public school system make it possible to define a socially shared
technology in public elementary schools in Denmark . The assessment of ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Acknowledgments | 7 |
Organizational Learning and the Ambiguity of the Past | 54 |
The Technology of Foolishness | 69 |
Copyright | |
11 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations James G. March,Johan P. Olsen,Søren Christensen Snippet view - 1979 |
Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations James G. March,Johan P. Olsen,Søren Christensen Snippet view - 1979 |
Common terms and phrases
academic accepted action active administrative affect allocation alternative ambiguity assembly associated assume attention become behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunity clear committee completely concerns connection consider consistent dean decision definition demands discussion District energy established existing expect fact faculty faculty members flow formal four garbage given goals governance grade ideas important increase individual institutions interest interpretation involved issues leaders less major March means meeting observed organization organizational outcomes parents participants particular perceived period person political position possible preferences present presidents problems procedures produce professional professors proposal question rational reason relatively represented require response result rules situation social solutions strong structure suggest Table teachers theory tion Tromsø understanding values