Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsUniversitetsforlaget, 1976 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 44
Page 294
... professors and the associate professors have a very strong majority ) , the deans of the seven schools ( Fakultet ) and one representative elected by the assistant professors and one by the students . The director of the university and ...
... professors and the associate professors have a very strong majority ) , the deans of the seven schools ( Fakultet ) and one representative elected by the assistant professors and one by the students . The director of the university and ...
Page 322
... professors of administrative responsibilities and burdens and providing close contact to the administration at the ... professors , associate professors , assistant pro- fessors and students . It is not clear from the document whether ...
... professors of administrative responsibilities and burdens and providing close contact to the administration at the ... professors , associate professors , assistant pro- fessors and students . It is not clear from the document whether ...
Page 332
... professors with the highest teaching load ( lektor ) increased from 2 in 1957 to 29 in 1965. During the first half of the 1960's the ratio of full professors / associate professors to assistant professors was .3 . The prospects for ...
... professors with the highest teaching load ( lektor ) increased from 2 in 1957 to 29 in 1965. During the first half of the 1960's the ratio of full professors / associate professors to assistant professors was .3 . The prospects for ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Introduction | 54 |
Copyright | |
17 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade accepted action active administrative alternative assembly associate assume attention attitudes become behavior beliefs Board candidates chairman choice opportunities clear College completely concerns consider consistent deadline dean decided decision demands discussion District educational effects energy established existing expect fact faculty faculty members flow formal four garbage give given goals governance grade house meeting ideas important increase indicate individual interest interpretation involved issues leaders less major March non-leaders observed organization organizational outcomes parents participation particular perceived period persons physics political position possible present problems procedures produced professional professors proposal question rational reasons relatively reorganization response result school committee situation social solutions strong structure suggest Table teachers theory tion Tromsø values vote