Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsUniversitetsforlaget, 1976 - 408 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 3
Page 203
... sell pots and pans and someone who wants to be admired . In a world in which most people care more about their self - esteem than they do about what pots and pans are bought , anyone who has the opposite scale of values is in strong ...
... sell pots and pans and someone who wants to be admired . In a world in which most people care more about their self - esteem than they do about what pots and pans are bought , anyone who has the opposite scale of values is in strong ...
Page 327
... sell " the physics - model to other depart- ments . Their desire for larger departments was met , but not through the uniting of smaller departments . A general growth process in the university increased the size of many departments ...
... sell " the physics - model to other depart- ments . Their desire for larger departments was met , but not through the uniting of smaller departments . A general growth process in the university increased the size of many departments ...
Page 328
... sell the idea . Soon the demand was larger than the supply of such positions . External events then made the participation and governance issues more central and reorganiza- tion became a choice opportunity in several departments . The ...
... sell the idea . Soon the demand was larger than the supply of such positions . External events then made the participation and governance issues more central and reorganiza- tion became a choice opportunity in several departments . The ...
Contents
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest | 38 |
Introduction | 54 |
Copyright | |
17 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
3rd grade teacher academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity architecture arena assembly attention attitudes August 27 behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunities choice situations College concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making demands desegregation discussion District educational effects energy expect faculty members formal participation full professors garbage garbage can model goals hierarchical house meeting ideology implementation important individual interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway Norwegian November 25 observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organization organizational choices outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenured theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo variables Vice-Chancellor vote