Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 89
Page 85
We expect these people to establish stable values and beliefs related to their
tasks and to deal with those tasks in terms of a comparatively stable definition of
the situation , including implicit expectations of the demands of others , less ...
We expect these people to establish stable values and beliefs related to their
tasks and to deal with those tasks in terms of a comparatively stable definition of
the situation , including implicit expectations of the demands of others , less ...
Page 86
situation in a complex organization is beyond the scope of the present study .
However , as a prelude to the present case study , we wish to call attention to four
conspicuous variables that will be considered in more detail in our study of a ...
situation in a complex organization is beyond the scope of the present study .
However , as a prelude to the present case study , we wish to call attention to four
conspicuous variables that will be considered in more detail in our study of a ...
Page 91
definition of the choice situation . With polarization of interaction , we obtain
segmentation of information . Also , participants will be more " free " to read their
own meaning into the situation and the importance of fictions and rumors will
increase ...
definition of the choice situation . With polarization of interaction , we obtain
segmentation of information . Also , participants will be more " free " to read their
own meaning into the situation and the importance of fictions and rumors will
increase ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Acknowledgments | 7 |
Organizational Learning and the Ambiguity of the Past | 54 |
The Technology of Foolishness | 69 |
Copyright | |
11 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations James G. March,Johan P. Olsen,Søren Christensen Snippet view - 1979 |
Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations James G. March,Johan P. Olsen,Søren Christensen Snippet view - 1979 |
Common terms and phrases
academic accepted action active administrative affect allocation alternative ambiguity assembly associated assume attention become behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunity clear committee completely concerns connection consider consistent dean decision definition demands discussion District energy established existing expect fact faculty faculty members flow formal four garbage given goals governance grade ideas important increase individual institutions interest interpretation involved issues leaders less major March means meeting observed organization organizational outcomes parents participants particular perceived period person political position possible preferences present presidents problems procedures produce professional professors proposal question rational reason relatively represented require response result rules situation social solutions strong structure suggest Table teachers theory tion Tromsø understanding values