Page images
PDF
EPUB

The Committee finally desires to announce that all communications addressed to any member thereof, or to the Chairman, containing suggestions for improvements in the Pharmacopoeia, will be thankfully received, carefully considered, and utilized as far as possible.

CHARLES RICE, Ph.D., New York, N. Y., elected Chairman, 1900, died May 13, 1901.

JOSEPH P. REMINGTON, Ph. M., Philadelphia, Pa., Chairman.

C. LEWIS DIEHL, Ph.M., Louisville, Ky., First Vice-Chairman. REYNOLD WEBB WILCOX, M.D., New York, N. Y., Second Vice-Chair

man.

ALFRED R. L. DонмE, Ph.D., Baltimore, Md., Secretary.

JOHN J. ABEL, M.D., Baltimore, Md.

CHARLES CASPARI, JR., Ph. G., Baltimore, Md.

VIRGIL COBLENTZ, Ph.D., New York, N. Y.
N. S. DAVIS, JR., M.D., Chicago, Ill.
JAMES M. GOOD, Ph. M., St. Louis, Mo.
WILLIS G. GREGORY, M.D., Buffalo, N. Y.
WALTER S. HAINES, M.D., Chicago, Ill.
CARL S. N. HALLBERG, Ph. G., Chicago, Ill.
H. A. HARE, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa.
HENRY KRAEMER, Ph. D., Philadelphia, Pa.
EDWARD KREMERS, Ph.D., Madison, Wis.
A. B. LYONS, M.D., Detroit, Mich.
JOHN MARSHALL, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa.
OSCAR OLDBERG, Phar. D., Chicago, Ill.
GEORGE F. PAYNE, M.D., Atlanta, Ga.

HENRY H. RUSBY, M. D., New York, N. Y. (elected October 10, 1901).
SAMUEL P. SADTLER, Ph.D., Philadelphia, Pa.

LUCIUS E. SAYRE, Ph. M., Lawrence, Kan.

WILBUR L. SCOVILLE, Ph. G., Boston, Mass.

EDWARD H. SQUIBB, M.D., Brooklyn, N. Y.

ALVISO B. STEVENS, Ph. C., Ann Arbor, Mich.

H. C. WOOD, M.D., Philadelphia, Pa., Ex-officio.

Committee of Revision of the Pharmacopoeia of the United States of America. (Eighth Decennial Revision.)

INTRODUCTORY NOTICES

POWDERS

Fineness of Powder. The fineness of powder is expressed, in the Pharmacopoeia, either by descriptive words (generally so in the case of brittle or easily pulverizable substances), or in terms expressing the number of meshes to a linear inch of the sieve through which the powder will pass. The corresponding values, in terms of metric measures of length, are added below in parentheses, but it has not been deemed advisable, in this revision, to substitute them in the text of the Pharmacopoeia for those at present in use. The diameter of the wire (gauge number) used in making sieve cloth has an important influence upon the size of the mesh, and it is necessary to specify in each case the thickness of the wire.

These different forms of expression correspond to each other as follows:

should pass through a sieve
having 80 or more meshes to

A very fine powder the linear inch (30 to the

A fine powder

A moderately fine powder

A moderately coarse powder

Cm.) and should be made
from gauge No. 38 wire.
should pass through a sieve
having 60 meshes to the lin-
ear inch (24 to the Cm.) and
should be made from gauge
No. 36 wire.

should pass through a sieve
having 50 meshes to the lin-
ear inch (20 to the Cm.) and
should be made from gauge
No. 35 wire.

should pass through a sieve
having 40 meshes to the lin-
ear inch (16 to the Cm.) and
should be made from gauge
No. 33 wire.

[blocks in formation]

A coarse powder

should pass through a sieve
having 20 meshes to the lin-
ear inch (8 to the Cm.) and
should be made from gauge
No. 28 wire.

=

No. 20 powder.

In certain cases, powders of a different degree of fineness (e.g., No. 30, No. 12) are directed to be taken.

POWDERS

Fineness of Powder. The fineness of powder is expressed, in the Pharmacopoeia, either by descriptive words (generally so in the case of brittle or easily pulverizable substances), or in terms expressing the number of meshes to a linear inch of the sieve through which the powder will pass. The corresponding values, in terms of metric measures of length, are added below in parentheses, but it has not been deemed advisable, in this revision, to substitute them in the text of the Pharmacopoeia for those at present in use. The diameter of the wire (gauge number) used in making sieve cloth has an important influence upon the size of the mesh, and it is necessary to specify in each case the thickness of the wire.

These different forms of expression correspond to each other as follows:

should pass through a sieve
having 80 or more meshes to

A very fine powder the linear inch (30 to the

A fine powder

A moderately fine powder

A moderately coarse powder

Cm.) and should be made
from gauge No. 38 wire.
should pass through a sieve
having 60 meshes to the lin-
ear inch (24 to the Cm.) and
should be made from gauge
No. 36 wire.

should pass through a sieve
having 50 meshes to the lin-
ear inch (20 to the Cm.) and
should be made from gauge
No. 35 wire.

should pass through a sieve
having 40 meshes to the lin-
ear inch (16 to the Cm.) and
should be made from gauge
No. 33 wire.

[blocks in formation]

A coarse powder

should pass through a sieve
having 20 meshes to the lin-
ear inch (8 to the Cm.) and
should be made from gauge
No. 28 wire.

=

No. 20 powder.

In certain cases, powders of a different degree of fineness (e.g., No. 30, No. 12) are directed to be taken.

« PreviousContinue »