Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Wisconsin, Volume 104 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 3
... brief by Miller , Noyes , Mil- ler & Wahl , and oral argument by Geo . H. Noyes . To the point that a threatened ... briefs by Sylvester , Scheiber & Orth , and oral argument by Frederick Scheiber . They con- tended , inter alia , that ...
... brief by Miller , Noyes , Mil- ler & Wahl , and oral argument by Geo . H. Noyes . To the point that a threatened ... briefs by Sylvester , Scheiber & Orth , and oral argument by Frederick Scheiber . They con- tended , inter alia , that ...
Page 17
... brief by Carl Runge , city attorney , and C. H. Hamilton , of counsel , and oral argument by Mr. Hamilton . They argued , among other things , that where the legal title is in an individual , the fact that the property may be used for ...
... brief by Carl Runge , city attorney , and C. H. Hamilton , of counsel , and oral argument by Mr. Hamilton . They argued , among other things , that where the legal title is in an individual , the fact that the property may be used for ...
Page 25
... briefs by B. J. Stevens and E. Mariner , attorneys ( W. F. Vilas , of counsel ) , and oral ar- gument by Mr. Stevens ... brief by Fish , Cary , Upham & Black , attorneys , and John T. Fish , of coun- sel , for the Kaukauna Water Power ...
... briefs by B. J. Stevens and E. Mariner , attorneys ( W. F. Vilas , of counsel ) , and oral ar- gument by Mr. Stevens ... brief by Fish , Cary , Upham & Black , attorneys , and John T. Fish , of coun- sel , for the Kaukauna Water Power ...
Page 26
... ; and in support of the motion there was a brief by Fish , Cary , Upham & Black . The motion was denied September 26 , 1899 . Kurtz vs. Jelleff . KURTZ , Respondent , vs. JELLEFF 26 [ 104 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN .
... ; and in support of the motion there was a brief by Fish , Cary , Upham & Black . The motion was denied September 26 , 1899 . Kurtz vs. Jelleff . KURTZ , Respondent , vs. JELLEFF 26 [ 104 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN .
Page 27
... brief by R. L. Morse , attor- ney , and J. Dobbs , counsel , and oral argument by J. H. Mc- Crory . J. J. Foote , for the respondent . CASSODAY , C. J. This is an action to recover $ 131.24 , money had and received . The answer ...
... brief by R. L. Morse , attor- ney , and J. Dobbs , counsel , and oral argument by J. H. Mc- Crory . J. J. Foote , for the respondent . CASSODAY , C. J. This is an action to recover $ 131.24 , money had and received . The answer ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affirmed agreement alleged amount answer appeal assigned attorney boiler Bradley brief Buel CASSODAY cause of action charge Chicago & Northwestern circuit court Circuit Judge claim clerk complaint conclusion condition contract contributory negligence corporation counsel court of equity damages Dane county death deed defective defendant defendant's Douglas county effect entitled error evidence executor fact feet fendant filed Fletcher Fogo garnishee held homestead injury instructions interest issue Jenkins judgment jury Lake Winnebago lands liable lien litigation logs lumber ment mill Milwaukee Milwaukee & St mortgage motion negligence Nelson notice oral argument owner paid parties payment person plaint plaintiff plaintiff in error purchase question railroad reason received recover register of deeds rendered res adjudicata respondent rule special verdict Stats statute testified testimony thereof tion town track trial court wife witness writ
Popular passages
Page 468 - ... when the question is one of a common or general interest, of many persons, or when the parties are numerous, and it is impracticable to bring them all before the 'court, one or more may sue or defend for the benefit of all.
Page 372 - But it is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence or an act not amounting to wanton wrong is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence or wrongful act, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances.
Page 533 - The court shall, in every stage of an action, disregard any error or defect in the pleadings, or proceedings, which shall not affect the substantial rights of the parties ; and no judgment shall be reversed or affected by reason of such error or defect.
Page 383 - ... in case of any fraud or false swearing by the insured touching any matter relating to this insurance or the subject thereof, whether before or after a loss.
Page 58 - That every receiver or manager of any property, appointed by any court of the United States, may be, sued in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property, without the previous leave of the court in-which such receiver or manager was appointed...
Page 55 - The property of no person shall be taken for public use without just compensation therefor.
Page 20 - ... profit, necessary for the location and convenience of the buildings of such association and embracing the same, not exceeding ten acres; and the lands reserved for grounds of a chartered college or university, not exceeding forty acres...
Page xxxviii - The heights by great men reached and kept Were not attained by sudden flight, But they, while their companions slept. Were toiling upward in the night.
Page 410 - This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment entered upon an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint in an action to...
Page 435 - The hearing which has been had is upon an order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue.