Debate on Platform "Cross of Gold" According to the agreement on debate, Senator Tillman, of South Carolina, was recognized by the chair. His speech was received with both hisses and applause. It was largely sec tional in character and before his time had expired, he had to give up the floor to Senator Hill of New York, who talked against the Platform as brought in by the majority. "Senator Hill insisted that the safest and best course for the Conven- "He declared it unwise for the party There was some cheering and applause when he retired but the assembly was in no mode for cold intellectual arguments. For this reason, his colleague in arms, Governor Russell, of Lassachusetts fared worse than he did. His showing was poor in 17. Great Leaders and National Issues, p. 595. comparison with Hill and he also yielded to popular opinion when he sat down. Perhaps it was because the last two speakers had failed to put their appeal on an emotional basis, perhaps it was because the majority wanted to hear the silver argument, or because Mr. Bryan was known to be a fluent and forceful orator that the assembly seemed to go mad as he proceeded to the platform. "As he confronted the twenty thousand yelling, cursing, shouting men before him they felt at once that indescribable magnetic thrill which beasts and men alike experience in the presence of a master. Serene and self-possessed, and with a smile upon his lips, he faced the roaring multitude with a splendid consciousness of power. Before a single word had been uttered by him, the pandimonium sank to an inarticulate murmur, and when he began to speak, even this was hushed to the profoundest silence. 18. His speech was calculated to please; when he had to refer to an utterance of an opponent, it was in a courteous and friendly manner, and his speech embodied sentiments familiar and acceptable to the common people in his party. He assailed the business men of the East because of their selfish and narrow definition of the term "businessman. "We say to you that you have made the 18. Peck, p. 498. employer, the attorney in a country town He spoke in defence of the income tax; he opposed the issue of currency by the National banks; speaking of the rising of the people in the few months preceding the convention, he said: "Why this change? Ah, my friends is "It is the issue of 1776 over again." |