Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in Ohio Courts of Record Except Supreme and Circuit...v. 1-31, Volume 21Laning printing Company, 1912 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 19
... paid . used because they represent the separate interests at issue in this case , but in a general way it may be said that the original in- vestment of $ 15,000 in 1867 now represents over two million dollars , or that each dollar of ...
... paid . used because they represent the separate interests at issue in this case , but in a general way it may be said that the original in- vestment of $ 15,000 in 1867 now represents over two million dollars , or that each dollar of ...
Page 21
... paid by the defendant . The son , John G. , at seventeen or eighteen years of age , became an assistant bookkeeper of the Russell & Morgan Com- pany , a position made for him by request of the defendant . He filled this position but a ...
... paid by the defendant . The son , John G. , at seventeen or eighteen years of age , became an assistant bookkeeper of the Russell & Morgan Com- pany , a position made for him by request of the defendant . He filled this position but a ...
Page 24
... paid on such stocks , and that such dividends were being used by their father as his own , although probably not knowing and at the time , money being plentiful , being in- different to the exact amounts thereof . After the children ...
... paid on such stocks , and that such dividends were being used by their father as his own , although probably not knowing and at the time , money being plentiful , being in- different to the exact amounts thereof . After the children ...
Page 60
... paid out the sum of $ 4,231.80 to themselves as individuals , each of them receiving $ 1,410.60 ; that none of this was delivered to the lodge or to the members of the lodge , and on August 1 , 1906 , the plaintiffs , as the trustees of ...
... paid out the sum of $ 4,231.80 to themselves as individuals , each of them receiving $ 1,410.60 ; that none of this was delivered to the lodge or to the members of the lodge , and on August 1 , 1906 , the plaintiffs , as the trustees of ...
Page 68
... paid " to the plaintiff , F. H. Grear ; that said grand lodge issued such certificate in accordance with and by virtue of the authority so to it given by said grand lodge and by said supreme lodge of such order , such supreme lodge ...
... paid " to the plaintiff , F. H. Grear ; that said grand lodge issued such certificate in accordance with and by virtue of the authority so to it given by said grand lodge and by said supreme lodge of such order , such supreme lodge ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affidavit agreement alleged amended appears apply attorney authority avers bond cause of action certificate charge Cincinnati Circ circuit court cited claim Cleveland Code common law constitution construction contract corporation council counsel court of equity creditors Cuyahoga Common Pleas decision defendant demurrer determine duty evidence fact fee simple filed Franklin Common Pleas fund grand jury Hamilton Common Pleas Hamilton county held Hocking Valley Railway indictment injunction issue judge judgment jurisdiction justice land legislature liability matter mayor ment motion municipal N. E. Rep necessary Ohio St opinion option laws ordinance overruled owner parties payment person petition plaintiff in error pleading probate court proceedings prosecution purpose question railroad company Railway real estate reason received rule statute streets supra Supreme Court sureties Syllabus approved Telephone therein thereof tion trust violation
Popular passages
Page 761 - A holder in due course is a holder who has taken the instrument under the following conditions: (1) That it is complete and regular upon its face; (2) That he became the holder of it before it was overdue, and without notice that it had been previously dishonored, if such was the fact; (3) That he took it in good faith and for value; (4) That at the time it was negotiated to him he had no notice of any infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating it.
Page 474 - The true distinction, therefore, is, between the delegation of power to make the law, which necessarily involves a discretion as to what it shall be, and conferring an authority or discretion as to its execution, to be exercised under and in pursuance of the law. The first cannot be done; to the latter no valid objection can be made.
Page 130 - ... shall be fined not more than two hundred dollars or imprisoned not more than one year, or both...
Page 761 - In the hands of any holder other than a holder in due course, a negotiable instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were nonnegotiable.
Page 761 - A holder in due course holds the instrument free from any defect of title of prior parties, and free from defenses available to prior parties among themselves, and may enforce payment of the instrument for the full amount thereof against all parties liable thereon.
Page 114 - Any corporation, society, order or voluntary association, without capital stock, organized and carried on solely for the mutual benefit of its members and their beneficiaries, and not for profit, and having a lodge system with ritualistic form of work and representative form of government, and which shall make provision for the payment of benefits in accordance with section 5 hereof, is hereby declared to be a Fraternal Benefit Society.
Page 153 - Act to recover damages for personal injuries to an employee, or where such injuries have resulted in his death, the fact that the employee may have been guilty of contributory negligence shall not bar a recovery, but the damages shall be diminished by the jury in proportion to the amount of negligence attributable to such employee...
Page 537 - ... amongst other things, in substance and to the effect following, that is to say: that he, said George B.
Page 153 - ... may have been guilty of contributory negligence shall not bar a recovery where his contributory negligence was slight and that of the employer was...
Page 246 - The court may determine any controversy between parties before it, when it can be done without prejudice to the rights of others, or by saving their rights ; but when a complete determination of the controversy cannot be had without the presence of other parties, the court must order them to be brought in.