INSURANCE – Continued. policy of fire insurance, the insured and the insurance company enter into a written agreement for an appraisal of the loss, evidence that it was orally agreed between the parties, contemporaneously with the execution of the written agreement, that the only question to be submitted to the appraisers was whether the loss should be fixed at $6,000 or $7,000 is incompetent, in the absence of proof that the written agreement was obtained by fraud or mistake. TOWNSEND 1. GREENWICH INSURANCE Co....
323 11. A loss paid under a mortgagee clause to the mortgagee must be ten- dered before suit by the owner.] Where the appraisers fix the loss at less than the full amount of the policy, and such amount has been paid over to a mortgagee of the insured property as provided by a mortgagee clause contained in the policy, the owners of the insured property, cannot, without returning or offering to return the amount paid over to the mortgagee, main- tain an action against the insurance company to recover the full amount of the policy, because of the alleged oral agreement limiting the power of the appraisers, even if such oral agreement be effective. Id.
12. The appraisers fix the loss, not the linbility.] The provision in the standard policy of fire insurance, that, in the event of a disagreement, the amount of the loss shall be determined by appraisers, contemplates that the determination of the appraisers shall fix, not the liabilities of the parties under the law, but the value of the property destroyed. I.
13. — Notice of the appraisers' meeting is not essential.] This provision does not oust the court of any part of its jurisdiction, and, in the absence of bad faith, the mere fact that the parties are not given notice of the meetings of the appraisers does not affect the validity of their proceedings. Id.
14. Fire insurance — a defense of fraud must be specifically pleaded.) In an action to recover upon a policy of fire insurance, containing a clause that fraud and false swearing on the part of the insured shall vitiate the policy, evidence of such fraud and false swearing is not admissible under a general denial.
Defenses which assume or admit the original cause of action alleged, and are based upon subsequent facts or transactions which go to qualify or defeat such cause of action, must be pleaded and proved by the defendant. CHEEVER v, BRITISH-AMERICAN INs. Co...
333 15. What proof that the insured was found hanged establishes suicide rather than murder.] What evidence, given in an action brought to recover upon a policy of insurance issued upon the life of a man, who was found hanging from the railing upon the platform of a secluded portion of a rail. road freight depot in a country village, entitles the defendant, wbich dis- claims liability under a suicide clause contained in the policy, to the direc- tion of a verdict in its favor, considered. SEYBOLD v. SUPREME TENT...... 195
16. A direction of a verdict for the company, notwithstanding the fact that certain premiums are recoverable in case the policy is not enforcible, ichen sustained.] The fact that the policy sued upon secured to the beneficiary the right to recover certain premiums paid upon the policy, in the event of an action to recover the full amount of the certificate being defeated by the defense of suicide, did not render it improper for the trial court to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant, it appearing that the right of the plaintiff to recover the premiums paid by the insured was not suggested to the trial court. ld.
17. The judgment thereon does not bar an action for the premiums.) Semble, that the judgment entered upon the verdict would not be a bar to an action brought by the plaintiff to recover the amount of the premiums paid by the insured. Id.
18. Answers made warranties — their falsity, whether material or not, aroids the policy.] Where the answers contained in the application for a policy of life insurance are, by the terms of the policy, made warranties, the falsity of such answers will avoid the policy independent of whether the answers were material to the risk or not. CROSBY 0. SECURITY Mut. LIFE INSURANCE Co......
89
INSURANCE - Continued.
19. When the question as to the falsity of answers in regard to attendance by a physician should be submitted to the jury.] In an action upon such a policy, it appeared that in the application for the policy the insured stated that it was about two years since he had last been attended by a physician or had consulted one, and that the name of such physician was Dr. G. C. Prichard. The evidence tended to show that, within a year prior to the issuing of the policy, the insured suffered from a slight indisposition and that, without his knowledge or consent, his wife called a physician named Dr. Burt to attend him. So far as appeared the insured did not hold any conversation with Dr. Burt as to his ailment or the proper course of treatment. The physician asked no questions of the insured, but made some suggestions as to the remedies which should be applied and the course of diet which should be followed. It did not appear whether the medicine prescribed was taken or whether the suggestions as to diet were followed.
Held, that it could not be said, as a matter of law, that the insured answered falsely in reference to his having been atteuded by a physician, but that, at most, the question of the falsity of the answers was one of fact which should have been submitted to the jury. Id.
— Attorney's lien on a life insurance policy – proof of the attorney's employment to collect it. MATTER OF SWEENEY..
547 See ATTORNEY AND CLIENT. INTENT — As to change of residence.
See ELECTION. INTOXICATING LIQUOR – Evidence — proof insufficient to sustain a con. viction of a bartender, of permitting persons, nut servants or members of his employer's family, to be present in a bar room on Sunday.] On the trial of a bartender in the employ of the holder of a liquor tax certificate under a charge that he violated subdivision g of section 31 of the Liquor Tax Law (Laws of 1896, chap. 112, as amd. by Laws of 1897, chap. 312), by permit- ting persons who were not servants of his employer or members of the latter's family to be present in the bar room on a Sunday, the defendant contended that the persons present in the bar room on the occasion in question were waiters in the employment of the holder of the certificate, and were at that time engaged in the course of their employment.
Held, upon a consideration of the evidence, that it was not sufficient to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the men in question were not what the defendant contended they were, and that a judgment of conviction should be reversed. PEOPLE 0. Ryan..
524 IRRELEVANT AND REDUNDANT MATTER — In a pleading — when stricken out.
See PLEADING. ISSUE – Trial of.
See TRIAL. JUDGE'S CHARGE
To the jury. See TRIAL. JUDGMENT - Res adjudicata - a judgment in an equitable action defin- ing a boundary line is conclusive between the same parties on the subsequent trial of an ejectment suit.] 1. A dispute having arisen between two adjoining lot owners respecting the dividing line between their premises, one of the parties brought an action in equity to establish the dividing line, while the other party brought an action in ejectment to recover possession of a strip of land which he claimed belonged to him. The two actions were referred to the same referee, who, after a trial of the equitable action, decided the same. The plaintiff in that action accepted the conclusion of the referce and entered a judgment in accordance therewith.
On the trial of the ejectment action, the judgment roll in the equitable action was received in evidence and the referee awarded judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the ejectment action in accordance with the conclusion reached by him in the equitable action.
Upon an appeal from the judgment rendered in the ejectment action it
JUDGMENT - Continued.
Held, that the defendant in that action could not insist that the con- clusion reached by the referee in the equitable action was the result of a mis- take upon the part of the referee, and that, if such judgment was corrected so as to accord with the referee's intention, it would embrace the premises awarded to the plaintiff in the ejectment action;
That any error committed by the referee in the equitable action could not be corrected by a collateral attack thereon. BECKER v. STUDEMAN.... 94
2. A judgment sustaining a demurrer to a portion of an answer should be interlocutory - it should not authorize the collection of costs.] A judgment sustaining a demurrer to a counterclaim interposed in an answer containing other issues should be interlocutory, and should not permit the collection of the costs until judgment is rendered on the other issues. BURNETT v. BURNETT ...
386 3. · Arrest of a plaintiff suing in tort, for non-payment of costs.] In an action of tort, in which the defendant is liable to arrest and imprisonment if the plaintiff is successful, a judgment in favor of the defendant for costs may be enforced by an execution against the person. SAFFIER 0. HAFT.. 284
Slander -- a general denial and in a single count a defense in justifica- tion and in mitigation - a demurrer to the latter, where it is sufficient as a defense in mitigation and insufficient as one in justification, is bad - the judgment should, in any event, be interlocutory and not final. DOYLE v. FRITZ..
515 See SLANDER.
Rendered upon accountings by executors — when the Statute of Limitations is not a bar to an action by a testator's children to procure an adjudication that a will is invalid so far as it directs an accumulation of the income of the estate after the children attain their majority. THORN 0. DE BRETEUIL..
405 See WILL.
Insurance - a direction of a verdict for the company, notwithstand- ing the fact that certain premiums are recoverable in case the policy is not enforcible, when sustained — the judgment thereon does not bar an action for the premiums. SEYBOLD v. SUPREME TENT.....
... 195 See INSURANCE.
Not vacated, on the ground that it was prosecuted by an attorney without authority, where the client bas acquiesced in its prosecution – what notice is insufficient to show want of authority in an attorney. BUTCHER v. QUINN....
391 See ATTORNEY AND CLIENT.
Short decision under Code of Civil Procedure, § 1022 — when the grounds thereof are not sufficiently stated — the judge who made it being no longer on the bench a new trial will be ordered. ĞEIN O. LITTLE ..... 503
See DECISION. JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT OF ACCOUNTS :
See ACCOUNTING, JURY Charge that the jury may consider the non-production of a paper in the possession of the plaintiff's attorney, which would explain the transaction at issue it is proper although such paper is in court and accessible.] 1. In an action to recover a sum of money which the plaintiff claimed to have loaned to the defendant, the principal issues litigated were as to whether the money in question was loaned to the defendant or to one Sherlock, for whom the defendant claimed he had acted as agent, and as to the time when a certain payment, which was relied upon to take the case out of the Statute of Limi. tations, had been made.
This payment was made by the defendant to the plaintiff's daughter, and, at the time of making it, he presented to, and left with, her, for the signa. ture of the plaintiff, a receipt for the money in question. The daughter, who gave important evidence for the plaintiff as to the date of the payment, admitted that she fixed the date of such payment largely by reference to the receipt. The receipt was in court in the possession of the plaintiff's attorneys, but they did not place it in evidence.
JURY - Continued.
The defendant asked the court to charge that the jury might“ take into consideration the fact of the non-production of this alleged receipt, referred to by Mrs. Young in her testimony, in determining what the original transac- tion was and where the truth in this matter lies."
The court declined to charge as requested because it appears that this paper is here in court and would be accessible."
Held, that the refusal to charge as requested constituted an error requiring a new trial. WERR v. Kohles
122 2. Verdict — when set aside because the amount thereof is not justified by the evidence.] In an action to recover for services performed by the plain- tiff for the defendant, the only issue litigated was as to the compensation which the parties had agreed that the plaintiff should receive for the services. According to the plaintiff's contention, the amount which he was entitled to recover was $900, while, according to the defendant's contention, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover anything. The jury rendered a ver- dict in favor of the plaintiff for $500.
Held, that the verdict was not justified by the evidence and that the judgment entered thereon should be reversed;
That the verdict rendered was clearly the result of a compromise and that it was impossible to say whether or not the defendant was unfavorably affected thereby.
A jury, in determining the amount of thcir verdict, cannot guess at such amount. They must be guided by the evidence and by the evidence alone; if there is no evidence to support the verdict, it has no foundation and must fall. Myers v. MYERS
3. Verdict not set aside, where the defendant claims that the jury were unduly influenced by persistent efforts to introduce incompetent evidence, the verdict not being excessive or the plaintiff's right to recover doubtful.] Where, upon an appeal by the defendant in a negligence case from a judgment entered upon a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant contended that the jury were unduly influenced by the conduct of the plaintiff's counsel in endeavoring to place before them the contents of a letter describing the cir- cumstances of the accident, written by the plaintiff's son-in-law to the defendant, the day following the accident, which letter was finally excluded as incompetent, the Appellate Division refused to reverse the judgment upon this ground, it appearing that the verdict was not excessive and that there was not so great a weight of evidence in favor of the defendant's theory of the accident as to create a doubt as to the justice of the verdict. CONNOLLY V. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS R. R. Co...
245 4.
Action of the judge in denouncing a witness' conduct.] When the action of the judge presiding at a jury trial, in denouncing as reprehensible the conduct of a witness in a matter to which he had testified and which had no direct bearing upon the main issue, does not constitute prejudicial error,
considered. In view of the great weight attached by jurors to expressions from the bench, harsh remarks about the motives of witnesses may not be generally commended; every unguarded expression of opinion by the trial judge on a question of fact during the trial is not, however, subject to exception as invading the province of the jury. METCALFE 0. GORDON
368 5. — Trial judge asking a series of questions of a witness.] A judgment will not be reversed because of the action of the trial judge in asking a series of questions of the witnesses examined, where this was done without objection or exception and from an impartial desire to elicit the truth. Id.
Testimony of an interested witness — the jury may credit it in part only. McGAHIE 0. McLENNEN
263 See EVIDENCE. JUSTIFICATION – In an action for slander.
See SLANDER. LACHES — City contract — appeal, from the engineer's decision, to other city officers — what delay in the action of such other officers justifies the contractor in bringing suit. See JOHNSON 0. CITY OF ALBANY....
567
PAGE. LANDLORD AND TENANT – Real estate broker the mere fact tbat a lease is made to a person procured by a broker does not entitle the latter to commissions. BRADY 0. AMERICAN MACHINE & FOUNDRY CO.....
267 See PRINCIPAL AND AGENT. LEGACY:
See WILL. LEGISLATURE — Power of.
See CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. LETTER - Written by a wife in her husband's presence when not a confi. dential communication.
See EVIDENCE. LETTERS PATENT Conditions of
See DEED. LIEN— Mechanic's lien – work performed by a sub-contractor with the knoul. edge and consent of the owner'.] The mere fact that a sub-contractor per- forms work under his contract, with the knowledge and consent of the owner, does not entitle him to a lien upon the premises. BUTLER 0. AQUEHONGA LAND Co..
439 Of an attorney.
See ATTORNEY AND CLIENT. Of a mortgage.
See MORTGAGE. LIFE ESTATE:
See REAL PROPERTY. LIFE INSURANCE:
See INSURANCE. LIMITATION OF ACTION When it is not a bar to an action by a testator's children to procure an adjudication that a will is invalid so far as it directs an accumulation of the income of the estate after the children attain their majority. THORN r. DE BRETEUIL...
405 See WILL
Banking — when the Statute of Limitations begins to run against a certificate of deposit. MATTER OF COOK .
586 See BANKING. LOST INSTRUMENT — Porder of a court of equity, on the giving of a bond, to allow a recovery on a lost instrument. See MATTER OF COOK
586 MAGISTRATE - In the city of Nero York — jurisdiction of.
See MUNICIPAL CORPORATION. MAINTENANCE:
See CHAMPERTY. MALICIOUS PROSECUTION – Action for malicious prosecution paper articles are competent to show the notoriety given to the plaintiff's arrest.] 1. "In an action brought to recover damages for the alleged malicious prose- cution by the defendant of a criminal action against the pl:intiff, the plain- tiff, for the purpose of showing the publicity given to the alleged wrong inflicted upon the plaintiff by the defendunt, is entitled to introduce in evi. dence newspaper articles stating the fact that he had been indicted, and the crime with which he was charged, and that he had been arrested and had given bail. BROWN v. SMALLWOOD
.... 76 2. · Not, however, where they contain the plaintiff's version of the matter.] If, however, such newspaper articles, in addition to the foregoing matters, purport to give the plaintiff's version of the transaction with considerable detail, which version, if true, exonerates the plaintiff from all blame and clearly indicates that the defendant caused the indictment to be found mali.
![[ocr errors]](https://books.google.com.bd/books/content?id=cbcLAAAAYAAJ&output=html_text&pg=PA672&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&q=%22Whenever+any+person+or+corporation+shall+exercise+a+power+of+appointment+derived+from+any+disposition+of+property+made+either+before%22&cds=1&sig=ACfU3U3ScrljxnlzJPdhzYJUSfuH1W5AMA&edge=0&edge=stretch&ci=821,1209,73,15)
« PreviousContinue » |