Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

Entered according to act of Congress, in the year one thousand nine hundred and three,

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

*Designated by the Governor on December 8, 1902, to sit temporarily.

CAUSES in which the decisions contained in the Appellate Division Reports have been passed upon by the Court of Appeals.

[blocks in formation]

Judgment affirmed: 176 N. Y. 11. HICKS v. MONARCH CYCLE MFG. Co........

Judgment reversed: 176 N. Y. 111. HOWARD IRON WORKS v. BUFFALO Co.....

Judgment reversed: 176 N. Y. 1.

.....

71 App. Div. 616 64 App. Div. 331 58 App. Div. 310 80 App. Div. 480

68 App. Div. 134 81 App. Div. 386

66 App. Div. 299

78 App. Div. 520

LOOMIS . CITY OF LITTLE FALLS..
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered for defendant: 176 N. Y. 31.
MATTER OF BROOKFIELD (SARLES' CLAIM).....
Order of Appellate Division reversed and that of Special Term affirmed: 176 N. Y. 138
MATTER OF BROWN v. SUPREME COURT.. . . . . .

.........

Judgment affirmed: 176 N. Y. 132.

NILES . NEW YORK CENTRAL & H. R. R. R. Co.....

Judgment affirmed: 176 N. Y. 119.

.....

66 App. Div. 259

.....

69 App. Div. 144

ROCHESTER & LAKE ONTARIO WATER CO. v. CITY OF ROCHESTER. 84 App. Div. 71 Judgment affirmed: 176 N. Y. 36.

TRENTON POTTERIES Co. v. TITLE GUARANTEE & TRUST CO.. 68 App. Div. 636

WALSH . CENTRAL N. Y. TEL. & TEL. Co....

Judgment affirmed: 176 N. Y. 65.

75 App. Div. 1

Judgment reversed: 176 N. Y. 163.

73 App. Div. 60

......

WANAMAKER v. WEAVER.......
Judgment of Appellate Division reversed and that entered upon the vcrdiet affirmed :

176 N. Y. 75.

WILCOX . AMERICAN TEL. & TEL. Co

73 App. Div. 614

Judgment reversed: 176 N. Y. 115.

The attention of the profession is called to the fact that the Court of Appeals in many cases decides an appeal upon other grounds than those stated in the opinion of the court below.

The affirmance or reversal of the judgment of the Appellate Division does not necessarily show that the Court of Appeals concurred in, or dissented from, the statements contained in the opinion of the Supreme Court. (Rogers v. Decker, 131 N. Y. 490.) — REP.

« PreviousContinue »