CAUSES in which the decisions contained in the Appellate Division Reports have been passed upon by the Court of Appeals. Judgment affirmed: 176 N. Y. 11. HICKS v. MONARCH CYCLE MFG. Co........ Judgment reversed: 176 N. Y. 111. HOWARD IRON WORKS v. BUFFALO Co..... Judgment reversed: 176 N. Y. 1. ..... 71 App. Div. 616 64 App. Div. 331 58 App. Div. 310 80 App. Div. 480 68 App. Div. 134 81 App. Div. 386 66 App. Div. 299 78 App. Div. 520 LOOMIS . CITY OF LITTLE FALLS.. ......... Judgment affirmed: 176 N. Y. 132. NILES . NEW YORK CENTRAL & H. R. R. R. Co..... Judgment affirmed: 176 N. Y. 119. ..... 66 App. Div. 259 ..... 69 App. Div. 144 ROCHESTER & LAKE ONTARIO WATER CO. v. CITY OF ROCHESTER. 84 App. Div. 71 Judgment affirmed: 176 N. Y. 36. TRENTON POTTERIES Co. v. TITLE GUARANTEE & TRUST CO.. 68 App. Div. 636 WALSH . CENTRAL N. Y. TEL. & TEL. Co.... Judgment affirmed: 176 N. Y. 65. 75 App. Div. 1 Judgment reversed: 176 N. Y. 163. 73 App. Div. 60 ...... WANAMAKER v. WEAVER....... 176 N. Y. 75. WILCOX . AMERICAN TEL. & TEL. Co 73 App. Div. 614 Judgment reversed: 176 N. Y. 115. The attention of the profession is called to the fact that the Court of Appeals in many cases decides an appeal upon other grounds than those stated in the opinion of the court below. The affirmance or reversal of the judgment of the Appellate Division does not necessarily show that the Court of Appeals concurred in, or dissented from, the statements contained in the opinion of the Supreme Court. (Rogers v. Decker, 131 N. Y. 490.) — REP. |