CAUSES in which the decisions contained in the Appellate Division Reports have been passed upon by the Court of Appeals. Judgment affirmed: 176 N. Y. 97. 72 App. Div. 628 71 App. Div. 616 Judgment affirmed: 176 N. Y. 11. HICKS. MONARCH CYCLE MFG. Co....... Judgment reversed: 176 N. Y. 111. HOWARD IRON WORKS v. BUFFALO CO....... Judgment reversed: 176 N. Y. 1. 68 App. Div. 134 81 App. Div. 386 66 App. Div. 299 78 App. Div. 520 LOOMIS . CITY OF LITTLE FALLS. ......... Judgment affirmed: 176 N. Y. 132. NILES . NEW YORK CENTRAL & H. R. R. R. Co...... Judgment affirmed: 176 N. Y. 119. 66 App. Div. 259 69 App. Div. 144 ROCHESTER & LAKE ONTARIO Water Co. v. CITY OF ROCHESTER. 84 App. Div. 71 Judgment affirmed: 176 N. Y. 36. TRENTON POTTERIES Co. v. TITLE GUARANTEE & TRUST CO.. 68 App. Div. 636 Judgment affirmed: 176 N. Y. 65. WALSH v. CENTRAL N. Y. TEL. & TEL. Co.... 75 App. Div. 1 Judgment reversed: 176 N. Y. 163. .... ...... WANAMAKER v. WEAVER. 73 App. Div. 60 Judgment of Appellate Division reversed and that entered upon the vcrdiet affirmed : 176 N. Y. 75. ... 73 App. Div. 614 Judgment reversed: 176 N. Y. 115. WILCOX v. AMERICAN TEL. & TEL. Co The attention of the profession is called to the fact that the Court of Appeals in many cases decides an appeal upon other grounds than those stated in the opinion of the court below. The affirmance or reversal of the judgment of the Appellate Division does not necessarily show that the Court of Appeals concurred in, or dissented from, the statements contained in the opinion of the Supreme Court. (Rogers v. Decker, 131 N. Y. 490.) — REP. |