ADDITIONAL REPRINTS Johnson, W. H. Monroe Doctrine: A Consideration from a .Nation 255 Rowe, L. S. Monroe Doctrine and American Foreign Policy.... Pennsylvania University Bulletin 261 Hart, Albert Bushnell. Shall We Defend the Monroe Doctrine?.. . North American Review 264 Usher, Roland G. Our Inconsistent Foreign Policy...... .New Republic 275) Hammond, John Hays. Trade Relations with Central and South America as Affected by the War... ...Annals of the American Academy 279 Fuller, Paul. Neutral Rights and Obligations of American .....Independent 293 .New York Times 306 Wilson, Woodrow. Address before the Second Pan-Ameri- Lansing, Robert. Address.. .New York Times 311 ........ Second Pan-American Scientific Congress Daily Bulletin 314 Galvez, Dr. Jose M. Pan-American Understanding.... Second Pan-American Scientific Congress Daily Bulletin 319 Barrett, John. Practical Pan-Americanism... .North American Review 321 Oliveira Lima, Manoel de. Effect of the War upon Pan American Cooperation... Pan-Americanism Defined.. .Advocate of Peace 331 .New Republic 334 BRIEF Resolved, That the Monroe Doctrine should be continued as part of the permanent foreign policy of the United States. INTRODUCTION I. The Monroe Doctrine has been the subject of considerable discussion in the past few years. A. In conferences which have convened for the special study of our international relations. B. In the press, on the platform, and by the people, not only in the United States, but also in Europe and in Central and South America. C. It has been condemned by some and vigorously reasserted by others as part of our foreign policy. II. The Monroe Doctrine, as formulated in President Monroe's message of 1823, was the result of two circumstances. A. The claim of Russia to occupy territory in the Northwest. B. The threatened intervention of the Holy Alliance to restore to Spain her former South American colonies. III. President Monroe's declaration was A. That the American continents were thereafter not to be considered open to colonization by European Powers. B. That any intervention in South American affairs would be regarded as unfriendly toward the United States. IV. It is generally admitted that the Doctrine has been extended to include A. That the United States has a paramount interest in American affairs. B. That it will resist, forcibly if necessary, all European agression. I. The acquisition of new territory. 2. Political intervention. DEBATERS' HANDBOOK SERIES Debaters' Manual Capital Punishment (2d ed. rev.) Commission Plan of Municipal Government (3d ed. rev. and enl.) Central Bank of the United States Child Labor (2d ed. rev. and enl.) Compulsory Arbitration of Industrial Disputes (2d ed. rev. and enl.) Compulsory Insurance Conservation of Natural Resources Direct Primaries (3d ed. rev. and enl.) Election of United States Senators (2d ed. rev.) Employment of Women Federal Control of Interstate Corporations (2d ed. rev. and enl.) Free Trade vs. Protection Government Ownership of Railroads (2d ed. rev. and enl.) Government Ownership of Telegraph and Telephone |