Page Page Olsen v. Homestead Land & Imp. Co. (Tex. Sup.) .... Omahundro, Hawkins v. (Tex. Civ. App.).1011 944 Rives v. Stephens (Tex Civ. App.). Rix v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).... Rix, Hudgins v. (Ark.). 765 Robbins v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). .1017 Robinson v. State (Tex. Civ. App.). 131 Robinson, Neal v. (Ky.). 707 198 422 473 566 335 701 Robison, City of St. Joseph v. (Mo.). 166 685 948 630 779 500 64 ... Park Hotel Co. v. Lockhart (Ark.). 23 Rogers v. Wallace (Tex. Civ. App.). Rogers v. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) Rodney v. St. Louis S. W. R. Co. (Mo.).. 887 Rogers v. Johnson (Mo.).. 635 .1024 Parr, Galveston, H. & S. A. R. Co. v. (Tex. Rogge, Anderson v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 106 Civ. App.).. 264 Parsons v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). 204 Rombauer, State ex rel. Giovanoni v. (Mo.) 968 Rombauer, State ex rel. St. Louis, K. C. & 711 C. R. Co. v. (Mo.). 75 582 Roochen v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). 198 Paul, Boyd v. (Mo.).. 171 Ross v. Meek (Tenn.). 20 Peckham v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). 532 Ross v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). 199 Pendergrass, Morris v. (Ark.). 430 Ross, Clifton v. (Ark.)... .1085 Ross, Houston City St. R. Co. v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 254 Phillips, New Madrid County v. (Mo.) Phillipson, Southern Pac. Co. v. (Tex. Civ. App.) Ruohs v. Third Nat. Bank of Chattanooga 321 (Tenn.) 303 Phipps, Benson v. (Tex. Civ. App.). Pickham, Smith v. (Tex. Civ. App.). Picton v. Sloan (Tex. Civ. App.). 359 565 Ryan v. Growney (Mo.). 189 251 Pierson v. Tyndall (Tex. Civ. App.). Pitts v. Elser (Tex. Sup.).. 232 518 Pitts, Richards v. (Mo.). 88 ... P. J. Willis & Bro. v. Murphy (Tex. App.) Civ. 362 Polanke v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). 541 St. Clair Land & Imp. Co. v. Martin (Mo.) 434 St. James Military Academy v. Gaiser Polk, Galveston, H. & S. A. R. Co. v. (Mo.) 851 Pollard, Williams v. (Tex. Civ. App.). .1020 St. Louis Club, State ex rel. Bell v. (Mo.) 604 St. Louis, H. & K. C. R. Co. v. Hannibal Union Depot Co. (Mo.)... 483 St. Louis, I. M. & S. R. Co., Barker v. Prather v. McClelland (Tex. Civ. App.). 94 St. Louis S. W. R. Co. v. Moss (Tex. Civ. Preston, Fidelity Trust & Safety Vault App.) .1038 Co. v. (Ky.)... 658 Price, Dunn v. (Tex. Sup.). 681 Puckett v. McDaniel (Tex. Civ. App.). Pullam, Biffle v. (Mo.).. 360 323 Pullen v. Ward (Ark.). .1084 Civ. App.) 719 .1080 St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Gracy (Mo.).. 736 St. Louis & S. F. R. Co., Adams v. (Mo.).. 496 St. Louis & S. F. R. Co., State v. (Mo.)..1074 St. Paul German Ins. Co. v. Craddock (Ark.) 424 947 San Angelo Nat. Bank v. Fitzpatrick (Tex. Civ. App.). 95 San Antonio St. R. Co. v. Watzlavzick (Tex. Civ. App.).. 115 Ramsey v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).. San Antonio & A. P. P. Co. v. Long (Tex. Randel, Farmer v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 384 Civ. App.). 214 Randle v. State (Tex. Cr. App.).. 953 Rapley, State v. (Ark.). 508 San Antonio & A. P. R. Co. v. Lynch (Tex. Civ. App.).... 952 Ray, Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. (Tex. Civ. App.) 256 Sanders, Summers v. (Tex. Civ. App.). .1038 Sapp v. Commonwealth (Ky.).... 158 Read, Downey v. (Mo.). 860 Saunders v. Ireland (Tex. Sup.). 271 352 Scarborough v. Hilliard (Tex. Civ. App.).. 231 1089 Scheussler v. Town of Mason (Tex. Civ. Reddick v. Elliot (Tex. Civ. App.). Reed, Ex parte (Tex. Cr. App.)... 43 App.) 42 689 Reed v. Covington & C. Bridge Co. (Ky.).. Reed v. Howell County (Mo.).. 149 Schiermeier, Golterman v. (Mo.). Schmidt v. Huff (Tex. Civ. App.). 177 Schmidt v. Huff (Tex. Sup.). 616 .1053 .1055 Reese, Vestal v. (Tex. Civ. App.). Reid, State v. (Mo.)... Reily. Mosely v. (Mo.). 172 Schneider, Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. (Tex. 895 Civ. App.). 260 Rhoads v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). 467 Schram v. Strouse (Tex. Civ. App.). 202 294 Schulten v. Bavarian Brewing Co. (Ky.).. 504 88 Schultz, McLaughlin v. (Mo.). 755 Richards. Dillingham v. (Tex. Sup.). Rivers, Burlington Ins. Co. v. (Tex. App.) 272 Scott v. State (Tex. Cr. Apn.). 947 Civ. Simpson, Fairbanks v. (Tex. Civ. App.). State, Anderson v. (Tex. Cr. App.). 467 200 951 807 950 272 507 Simpson, Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 837 Sims, Eaton v. (Ark.). 429 Sindlinger v. City of Kansas City (Mo.). 857 Sloan, Picton v. (Tex. Civ. App.)... 251 State, Borer v. (Tex. Čr. App.). 951 467 471 536 465 198 272 808 810 464 532 811 952 110 Smith, Garland v. (Mo.). 191 Smith, Garland v. (Mo.). 196 State, Cook v. (Tex. Cr. App.). 476 Sup.) 520 State, Crane v. (Tenn.). 317 Smith, Hadden v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 458 State, Craven v. (Tex. Cr. App.). 472 Smith, State v. (Mo.)... 181 Smith, Western Union Tel. Co. v. (Tex. Sup.) 931 State, Derrick v. (Tex. Cr. App.). 818 815 950 Snuffer v. Howerton (Mo.).. 166 State, Earl v. (Tex. Cr. App.).. 469 Snyder v. Compton (Tex. Sup.). ..1061 Sollock v. Burwell (Tex. Civ. Äpp.). 553 Solomon v. Wright (Tex. Civ. App.). 414 Southern Bldg. & Loan Ass'n, Dixon v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 58 Southern Bldg. & Loan Ass'n of Knoxville v. Hallum (Ark.). . 420 Southern Pac. Co. v. Phillipson (Tex. Civ. State, English v. (Tex. Cr. App.). 542 469 948 197 537 472 471 470 466 Southern R. Co., Senn v. (Mo.). 66 South St. Joseph Land Co. v. Bretz (Mo.).. 656 State, Gonzales v. (Tex. Cr. App.). 947 South St. Joseph Land Co., Hanna v. (Mo.) 652 State, Gooch v. (Ark.) . . 510 Sparkman, Little Rock & M. R. Co. v. (Ark.) 509 State, Gouhenour v. (Tex. Cr. App.). 201 468 Spence v. Morris (Tex. Civ. App.). 405 State, Hall v. (Tex. Cr. App.). 200 Spraul, Steinhauser v. (Mo.).. 620 Sproles, Lewis v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 94 356 State, Hallowel v. (Tex. Cr. App.). 468 204 476 467 203 203 State, Hickman v. (Tex. Cr. App.). 687 Strouse, Schram v. (Tex. Civ. App.).. Stuart v. Altman (Tex. Civ. App.). Stuart v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). 262 461 806 225 Suddath v. Gallaher (Mo.). 880 199 Sullivan v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). 202 Swango, Brown v. (Ky.).. 156 272 465 Sweet, Cannon v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 533 Swenson v. Seale (Tex. Civ. App.).. 345 718 143 816 Talbot, American Brewing Co. v. (Mo.)... 585 469 Tankersley, Adoue v. (Tex. Civ. App.).. 346 467 Tapp v. Todd (Ky.)... 147 203 817 Tarrant County, Terrell v. (Tex. Civ. App.) 367 536 Tarver, Ostrom v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 474 Tatum v. City of St. Louis (Mo.). Taylor, Ex parte (Tex. Cr. App.). 701 .1002 957 685 Taylor, Hill v. (Mo.). 599 (Ky.) 686 Taylor, Louisville, St. L. & T. R. Co. v. 537 666 475 Tejada, Elmendorf v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 563 686 Terrell v. Tarrant County (Tex. Civ. App.) 367 541 Terry, Potts v. (Tex. Civ. App.).. 122 202 Texas Bldg. & Loan Ass'n, Logan v. (Tex. Civ. App.) 141 532 Texas Elevator & Compress Co. v. Mitchell 541 (Tex. Civ. App.). 683 45 Texas Loan Agency, Fleming v. (Tex. 947 Civ. App.). 388 App.) App.) 808 Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. Echols (Tex. Sup.) 517 953 Texas & P. R. Co. v. Gill (Tex. Civ. App.) 911 467 Texas & P. R. Co. v. Hudman (Tex. Civ. 198 388 473 Texas & P. R. Co. v. Woods (Tex. Civ. 566 416 (Tenn.) 685 Third Nat. Bank of Chattanooga v. O'Brien 948 293 199 198 Third Nat. Bank of Chattanooga, Ruohs v. (Tenn.).. 303 947 Thomas v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). 534 541 Thomas v. Winchester Bank (Ky.). 774 540 Thomas. Jones v. (Mo.). 76 687 Thomas, Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. (Tex. 816 Civ. App.) 139 Thomas, Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. (Tex. 471 466 Thompson v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). 806 Thompson v. State (Ark.).. 537 Thomson v. Cohen (Mo.). 684 794 984 539 Thomson v. Langdon (Tex. Sup.). 931 537 Threadgill, Pumphrey v. (Tex. Civ. App.).. 450 272 Tiernan, McCaffery v. (Mo.). 893 534 Tillman, Osborne v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 131 681 Tinsley, Anderson v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 121 794 Tips, Laughlin v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 551 199 Todd, Tapp v. (Ky.)... 147 473 Toepperwein, Wolff v. (Tex. Civ. App.)..1009 470 Tombler v. Koelling (Ark.)..... 795 814 Town of Mason, Scheussler v. (Tex. Civ. 474 App.) 42 312 Travelers' Protective Ass'n of America, Lovelace v. (Mo.).. 877 200 468 State, Wilson v. (Ark.).. State, Winn v. (Tex. Cr. App.). Steele, Minton v. (Mo.). 507 Tripis v. Gamble (Tex. Civ. App.). 807 Truesdail v. McCormick (Mo.)... 201 Tufts v. Hodges (Tex. Civ. App.). 204 Tuggle v. Hughes (Tex. Civ. App.). 431 Tullis v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). Trimble. Pullman Palace-Car Co. v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 96 244 885 110 61 199 939 Turner v. Butler (Mo.).. 77 Steffen v. Fox (Mo.). Steinhauser v. Spraul (Mo.). Stephens, Rives v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 662 Tyndall, Pierson v. (Tex. Civ. App.)..... 232 746 70 Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. v. Chowning 620 (Tex. Civ. App.).... 707 Union Depot R. Co., Olfermann v. (Mo.).. 742 117 Stifel. Witte v. (Mo.). 891 Wakefield v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). 470 Co. v. (Tex. Civ. App.). Walker v Cole (Tex. Civ. App.). Wallace, Rogers v. (Tex. Civ. App.). White, Burnham v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 920 474 v. 917 312 783 .1096 151 Ware, Hume v. (Tex. Sup.). 935 .1084 Williams v. Kohn (Tex. Civ. App.). 920 853 .1020 958 Warner Elevator Manuf'g Co. v. Houston Willis, Hudson v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 913 (Tex. Civ. App.)... 405 Willis, Hudson v. (Tex. Sup.). 929 Warrick, City Bank of Sherman v. (Tex. Willis, Rushing v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 921 Civ. App.)... 366 Waters v. Waters' Ex'r (Ky.). 958 Willis & Bro. v. Murphy (Tex. Civ. App.) 362 Waters, Barlow v. (Ky.). 785 Civ. App.). 925 Waters' Ex'r, Waters v. (Ky.). 958 Wilson v. Hunter (Ark.). 419 Wathen, Baughman v. (Tex. Civ. App.).. 231 Wilson v. Knox County (Mo.). 896 Watkins v. Sproull (Tex. Civ. App.). 356 Wilson v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). 200 Watts, Darnaby v. (Ky.). 338 Wilson v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). 468 Watzlavzick, San Antonio St. R. Co. v. Wilson v. State (Ark.).. 507 (Tex. Civ. App.)... 115 Wilson, Miller v. (Mo.).. 640 Wayne County, St. Louis, C. G. & Ft. S. R. Co. v. (Mo.) Wear, Gillon v. (Tex. Civ. App.). .1014 Winner v. Lippincott Inv. Co. (Mo.). 998 Weatherford v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). 814 Weaver v. Scurry County (Tex. Civ. App.) 836 Withrow, Kennard v. (Tex. Civ. App.)... 226 891 Webb v. Archibald (Mo.). 80 Woessner v. Wells (Tex. Civ. App.).... 217 Webb v. Brewer (Tex. Civ. App.). ...... 94 Wolf v. Butler (Tex. Civ. App.). 51 Weigelman v. Bronger (Ky.)... 334 Wolf, Oil-Well Supply Co. v. (Mo.). 167 Weir Plow Co. v. Armentrout (Tex. Civ. Wolff v. .1045 Weiss, Shepard v. (Tex. Civ. App.). Toepperwein (Tex. Civ. App.)..1009 Wood, First Nat. Bank of Cisco v. (Tex. 355 Civ. App.).. 384 247 Wood, Rhodes v. (Tenn.). 294 Woods v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 201 v. (Tex. Sup.). 277 Woods, Texas & P. R. Co. v. (Tex. Civ. West, Bomar v. (Tex. Sup.). 519 App.) 416 West, Sell v. (Mo.). 969 Western Union Tel. Co. v. Apple (Tex. Civ. Woodward v. State (Tex. Cr. App.). 204 151 .1022 Western Union Tel. Co. v. Gidcumb (Tex. 699 Worsham v. Chisum (Tex. Civ. App.). 905 918 286 Western Union Tel. Co. v. J. A. Kemp 905 Wright, Solomon v. (Tex. Civ. App.). 414 Western Union Tel. Co. v. Johnson (Tex. Civ. App.) 557 Civ. App.).. 124 Wulff, Cornwell v. (Mo.). 162 Western Union Tel. Co. v. Kinsley (Tex. Civ. App.).. . .. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Linney (Tex. Young v. Byrd (Mo.).... 83 Civ. App.)... 234 Young v. La Rue's Adm'r (Ky.). 790 Western Union Tel. Co. v. O'Keefe (Tex. 945 Western Union Tel. Co. v. Smith (Tex. Sun.) 931 Young, City of Dallas v. (Tex. Civ. App.).1036 819 700 REHEARINGS DENIED. [Cases in which rehearings have been denied, without the rendition of a written opinion, since the publication of the original op nions in 25 and 26 S. W. This list does not include cases where an opinion has been filed on the denial of the rehearing.] Moore v. Cross (Tex. Civ. App.) 26 S. W. 122. t THE SOUTHWESTERN REPORTER. VOLUME 28. STATE v. HOEFFNER. (Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 2. Nov. 5, 1894.) SCIRE FACIAS-FORFEITED RECOGNIZANCE-RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL. As a proceeding by scire facias upon a forfeited recognizance is not a civil action, a surety is not entitled, under either Const. art. 2, § 28, providing that the right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate, or under Rev. St. § 2131, providing that an issue of fact in an action for the recovery of money only must be tried by a jury, to have the issues of fact raised by his answer tried by a jury. Appeal from St. Louis criminal court; H. L. Edmunds, Judge. Proceeding by scire facias on a forfeited recognizance given to secure the attendance of Lee Qua Lang at the St. Louis court of criminal correction. Judgment was rendered against George Hoeffner, the surety, and he appeals. Affirmed. Thos. B. Harvey, for appellant. Walker, for the State. R. F. BURGESS, J. On the 9th day of Febru ary, 1893, there was duly issued from the office of the clerk of the criminal court for the city of St. Louis a scire facias against the defendant, which recited that on the 30th day of April, 1892, the defendant had signed a bond to the state of Missouri in the court of criminal correction of said city as the surety of one Lee Qua Lang (who then stood charged in said court of criminal correction with having committed a felony) for his (Lang's) appearance in the court of criminal correction on the 12th day of May, 1892; that default was made in said court on said last-named day by said Lang, which was certified to the St. Louis criminal court, and judgment of forfeiture rendered thereon. The writ com manded defendant to appear on the return day thereof, and show cause why the state of Missouri should not have execution. Defendant filed answer to the scire facias, putting in issue all the recitals and allegations therein contained. On the 2d day of October, 1893, the cause was called for trial in the criminal court, when defendant requested and demanded a trial by jury, which was refused by the court, and he saved his exceptions. The court then proceeded to hear v.28s.w.no.1-1 the case, and made its finding in favor of the state. From the finding and judgment, defendant appealed. The only point urged upon the attention of this court is the action of the trial court in refusing defendant a trial by jury. Section 2131, Rev. St., reads as follows: "An issue of fact in an action for the recovery of money only, or of specific real or personal property, must be tried by a jury, unless a jury trial be waived or reference ordered as hereinafter provided." Whatever may have been said in other jurisdictions with respect to the nature of the proceeding by scire facias on a forfeited recognizance, whether civil or a continuation of the original proceeding, the holding in this state has bees that it is a mere continuation of an original proceeding to enforce the collection of a debt confessed. State v. Randolph, 22 Mo. 474; State v. Heed, 62 Mo. 559. See, also, Lawton v. State, 5 Tex. 272; 2 Bouv. Inst. c. 29, It § 3721. The writ is a common-law writ. is not the commencement of a "civil" or "new" action, within the meaning of the Code; but the writ recites the recognizance and judgment of forfeiture, and requires the parties to appear in court at the next regular term, and show cause, if any they can, why final judgment shall not be entered against them for the amount of the recognizance so forfeited, and execution issued therefor. The practice has been in this state and many others to plead to the writ, although our Code is silent as to the course to be pursued with respect to a scire facias issued upon a forfeited recognizance. Every defense which could be made by way of plea or demurrer to a petition may also be made to the writ, and, when demurred to, the demurrer goes to the entire record. The writ may be amended when necessary, as pleadings in civil cases; the only difference being that, where a demurrer is filed to any pleading in an ordinary civil action, it only goes to the face of such pleading, while, in case of a demurrer to a scire facias issued upon a forfeited recognizance, it goes to the whole record. State v. Randolph and State v. Heed, supra. This is not a "civil action," within the meaning of the Code, for the recovery of money. Instead of a summons being issued |