and 114 New York State Reporter gage held to have failed in view of foreclosure of such mortgage.-Priest v. Gumprecht (Sup.) 759. Under Code Civ. Proc. § 1628, held, that an application for leave to sue on a bond accompanying a mortgage on real estate should have been denied.-In re Byrne (Sup.) 977. MOTIONS. Continuance in civil actions, see "Continuance." Opening or setting aside default judgment, see "Judgment," § 2. Relating to pleadings, see "Pleading," § 6. Denial of a motion to open default held not a bar to motion to set aside the judgment on grounds not before known or appearing.Sutherland v. Mead (Sup.) 504. An order to show cause, under Code Civ. Proc. § 780, and Gen. Rules Prac. No. 37, must be based on the affidavit showing the reason therefor.-Stryker v. Churchill (Sup.) 588. MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS. See "Counties"; "Schools and School Districts," § 1; "Towns." Municipal courts, see "Courts." § 2. of the Civil War an absolute right to be preferred in the making of an appointment, notwithstanding article 10, § 2.-People v. Burch (Sup.) 274. Under civil service law (Laws 1899, c. 370, § 21, as amended by Laws 1902, c. 270, § 1), and Greater New York Charter, § 1543, a veteran cannot be dismissed from the service, though his office is abolished in good faith.-Jones v. Willcox (Sup.) 420. A city charter, giving the board of estimate and apportionment authority to fix the salary of the commissioner of public works, confers absolute authority on the board, and the salary cannot be reduced by the council.-Grant v. City of Rochester (Sup.) 522. Facts stated held not to preclude the commissioner of public works from recovering arrears of salary.-Grant v. City of Rochester (Sup.) 522. Clerk held not entitled to salary from January 1, 1902, to June 10, 1902, under Laws 1902, c. 466, § 1543.-Kastor v. City of New York (Sup.) 952. The fire commissioner of the city of New York had power to dismiss the chief of the Ordinances relating to intoxicating liquors, see city fire department after a hearing for cause."Intoxicating Liquors." Street railroads, see "Street Railroads." § 1. Proceedings of council or other governing body. Under New York City Charter (Laws 1901, c. 466) § 27, held, that the power of the board of aldermen to pass on the election of its members is only as to the returns made according to Election Law (Laws 1896, c. 909, as amended by Laws 1961. c. 95) § 11. subd. 2, and sections 130, 131, 133, 135-138.-People v. Fornes (Sup.) 385. § 2. Officers, agents, and employés Municipal officers in general. Under Const. art. 5, § 9, Laws 1899, c. 370, § 20, only qualifies the power of appointment vested in local authorities by Const. art. 10, § 2, within limits prescribed by the constitution itself. People v. Stratton (Sup.) 269. Under Laws 1899, c. 370, § 20, the report of the civil service commission is conclusive as to the qualifications and fitness of a veteran for appointment to office.-People v. Stratton (Sup.) 269. Where the civil service commissioners certify an eligible list of persons for a certain appointment, certifying that one is a veteran, such certificate sufficiently advises the appointing power of his right to a preference in appointment.-People v. Stratton (Sup.) 269. Since the repeal of Laws 1896, c. 821, which required applications for appointment as veterans to show that the applicant did not serve in the Confederate army or navy, by Laws 1899, c. 370, such fact need not appear on the application.-People v. Stratton (Sup.) 269. Const. art. 5, § 9, relating to appointments in the civil service, held to confer on veterans People v. Sturgis (Sup.) 194. Under Greater New York Charter, § 1185, a sanitary inspector is an officer, and entitled to his salary while willing to perform the duties, though temporarily prevented from doing so.Stoddart v. City of New York (Sup.) 344. Under Greater New York Charter, § 1536, a sanitary inspector in a village included in the Consolidation continued thereafter in the employ of the city.--Stoddart v. City of New York (Sup.) 344. to salary as such.-Toole v. Ogden (Sup.) 584. Duly appointed police captain held entitled Captain of police, certified by civil service commission on false report from the police commissioners, held entitled to salary until removed by action by the attorney general.-Toole v. Ogden (Sup.) 584. Objection that certain party could not testify against fireman held waived.-People v. Scannell (Sup.) 685. The one making the charges against a fireman could testify against him on the trial, though his name was not given as one of the witnesses.— People v. Scannell (Sup.) 685. Judgment dismissing fireman need not have exact accuracy of record of criminal court.— People v. Scannell (Sup.) 685. Facts held not to show that fireman was dismissed before the charges against him were approved by the commissioner.-People v. Scaunell (Sup.) 685. Under Greater New York Charter, §§ 299. 355, a member of the park police force, trans ferred to the consolidated force of New York City, held not a member of the first grade on such transfer, though he had served five years INDEX. (Sup.) 986. before the transfer.-Bennett v. City of New construed. - Hastings v. City of New York Agents and employés. A veteran employed in the department of 168. Cashier of commissioner of public works held § 5. Public improvements. Under New York Charter, § 990 (Laws 1897, Section 990, New York Charter (Laws 1897, Under its charter (Laws 1895, c. 635) the city Front-foot rule of assessments for sewer im- § 8. Torts. Inability of a plaintiff in an action against a In an action against a city to recover for in- - In an action against a city for injuries re- In an action against a city for injuries, owing A city, sued for injuries owing to a pedes- In an action against an abutting owner for In determining the sewer assessment in § 6. Police power and regulations. New York Sanitary Code, § 66, does not vest New York City Sanitary Code, § 66, adopted The Legislature acted within its authority in § 7. Use and regulation of public pla- In an action for injuries by slipping on ice on In an action for injuries by ice on a city Sale for unpaid taxes, made in May, 1883, MUNICIPAL COURTS. Municipal grant of lands under water on the 80 N.Y.S.-75 and 114 New York State Reporter MUTUAL BENEFIT INSURANCE. See "Insurance," § 7. NAMES. adult, unless he does not have the capacity sufficient to_exercise the care of an adult.Charlton v. Forty-Second St., M. & St. N. Are. R. Co. (Sup.) 174. In an action for personal injury resulting from the fall of a dumb waiter, held, that cot Continuance of firm name after death of part-tributory negligence was not shown.-Vanderca: ner, see "Partnership," § 2. NAVIGABLE WATERS. See "Waters and Water Courses." NEGLIGENCE. By particular classes of parties. See "Carriers," §§ 1, 2; "Municipal Corporations," § 8. Employers, see "Master and Servant," § 3. Railroad companies, see "Railroads," § 1. Condition or use of particular species of property, works, or machinery. See "Bridges," § 2; "Highways," § 2; "Railroads," § 1; "Street Railroads," § 2. Demised premises, see "Landlord and Tenant," § 3. Production, supply, and use of gas, see "Gas." Contributory negligence. Of passenger, see "Carriers," § 2. Of person injured at railroad crossing, see "Railroads," § 1. Of person injured in street railroad track, see "Street Railroads." § 2. Of servant, see "Master and Servant," § 3. § 1. Acts omissions or negligence. constituting The owner of a barge held not liable to an employé of the company, owning a steamer into which the barge was to unload, for injury sustained by such employé through a defect in the barge deck.-Huebner v. Hammond (Sup.) 295. A cemetery company held liable for the exercise of ordinary care to see that gravestones in a public lot were maintained so as not to injure pedestrians lawfully in the lot.-Dutton v. Greenwood Cemetery Co. (Sup.) 780. Where a signboard on defendant's land blew down and frightened plaintiff's horse, which became unmanageable, and plaintiff was injured, held, that defendant was not liable.-O'Sullivan v. Knox (Sup.) 848. § 2. Contributory negligence. The negligence of decedent's elder brother, in whose custody he was when killed by a street car, will be imputed to him.-Levine v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co. (Sup.) 48. Parents of decedent held not guilty of negligence in permitting him to go across a city v. Universal Trust Co. (Sup.) 290. § 3. Actions. Evidence held insufficient to support a finding that the negligence of defendant in leaving unguarded a hole which he had cut in ice was the cause of the death of plaintiff's intestate.— Nellis v. Laughlin (Sup.) 30. Where plaintiff fell while riding a wooden horse on defendant's gravity railroad, held, that it is error to instruct that it may be inferred, from the accident having occurred, that de fendant was negligent.-Huneke v. West Brighton Amusement Co. (Sup.) 261. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur operates to defendant, but does not shift the burden of raise a presumption of negligence against the proof.-Adams v. Union Ry. Co. (Sup.) 264. In an action for injury from the fall of a taining rope, evidence of former defect and redumb waiter, caused by the breaking of the suspair of the same rope held admissible.-Vandercar v. Universal Trust Co. (Sup.) 290. An instruction, in an action for the killing of a boy, that he should use such care as a boy of his age under like circumstances would exercise and deem adequate thereto, held not erroneous as making the degree of care depend on the operation of the deceased's mind.-McDonald v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co. (Sup.) 577. An infant upward of 12 years of age held sui juris, and required to exercise the same degree of care for his safety as an adult, in the absence of proof by plaintiff of the infant's mental capacity.-McDonald v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co. (Sup.) 577. Where the facts as pleaded disclose negligence of the defendant in maintaining an unsafe structure on his land, whereby plaintiff is injured, an action lies thereon, although an action for nuisance might also be maintained.-O'Sullivan v. Knox (Sup.) 848. NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS. See "Bills and Notes." NEW TRIAL Remand by appellate court for new trial, see "Appeal," § 8. NEXT OF KIN. with his elder brother, who was familiar there- See "Descent and Distribution." An infant of 12 years or above is chargeable NOMINATION. with the measure of care demanded of an For office, see "Elections," § 1. § 1. Appointment, qualification, and tenure. A veteran cannot be deprived of his office by Pen. Code, § 41x, providing that elected can- a sworn statement of election expenses, held un- OPENING. Judgment, see "Judgment," § 2. OPINION EVIDENCE. In civil actions, see "Evidence," § 9. OPINIONS. Of courts, see "Courts," § 1. ORDERS. For inspection of books, see "Discovery," § 1. On granting injunction, see "Injunction," § 2. ORDINANCES. Municipal ordinances, see "Municipal Corpora- PARENT AND CHILD. See "Guardian and Ward"; "Infants." Negligence of parent imputable to child, see PAROL EVIDENCE. In civil actions, see "Evidence," § 8. PARTICULARS. Bill of, see "Divorce," § 1; "Pleading," § 5. PARTIES. Death ground for abatement, see "Abatement In actions by or against particular classes of Co-tenants, see "Partition," § 1. In particular actions or proceedings. See "Release," § 1. and 114 New York State Reporter 1. New parties and change of parties. Under Code Civ. Proc. § 452, as amended by Laws 1901, c. 512, the question whether a new party should be brought into an action is still within the discretion of the court.-Pope v. Manhattan Ry. Co. (Sup.) 316. Laws 1897, c. 420, § 20, subd. 1, held not to authorize the continuance of a partnership name by a surviving partner, unless he has purchased the partnership good will. - Slater v. Slater (Sup.) 363. Pen. Code, §§ 363, 363b, held to prohibit the In an action by an administrator to recover on continuance of the use of a firm name containa life policy, one who claimed the policy as as- ing the name of a deceased partner, unless othsignee thereof held a proper party defendant.-erwise authorized by statute.-Slater v. Slater Hasberg v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. (Sup.) 867. (Sup.) 363. § 2. Defects, objections, and amend ment. Laws 1897, c. 420, § 20, subd. 1, held not to authorize a decree in the settlement of the estate of a deceased partner for a sale of the right to conduct business under the firm name. The joinder of an excessive number of defendants is not ground for demurrer to a cause of action properly pleaded as to the answering de--Slater v. Slater (Sup.) 363. fendant.-Adams v. Slingerland (Sup.) 635. The purchase of the good will of a business The joinder of an excessive number of defend- of a partnership dissolved by death gives the ants is not a defense to a cause of action prop-right to use the name of the partnership for the erly pleaded as to an answering defendant. purpose of advertising as its successor.-Slater v. Slater (Sup.) 363. Adams v. Slingerland (Sup.) 635. A demurrer on the ground that a complaint does not state a cause of action does not present the question of the legal capacity of the plaintiff to sue.-Herbert v. Montana Diamond Co. (Sup.) 717. PARTITION. 81. Actions for partition. Issue, in partition, as to whether ancestor of parties had received more personalty from his ancestor's estate than he was entitled to, held not determinable for lack of proper parties.-Skillin v. Skillin (Sup.) 188. PARTNERSHIP. § 1. Mutual rights, duties, and ties of partners. pensation for his services in winding up the afA surviving partner is not entitled to comfairs of the firm.-Slater v. Slater (Sup.) 363. An executor cannot charge to the estate liens on property conveyed to him by his testator.In re Mertens' Estate (Sur.) 376. A partner, accounting as executor of a deceased partner, may be charged with amount admitted by him to have been received by him as executor from himself as surviving partner.In re Mertens' Estate (Sur.) 376. Executor of one partner cannot be forced to the estate of another deceased member is not account as for the partnership estate, where represented. In re Mertens' Estate (Sur.) 376. § 3. Dissolution, settlement, and accounting. Code Civ. Proc. § 3320, providing that compensation of a receiver shall be discretionary with the court appointing him, applies to a reliabili-ceiver appointed to wind up the affairs of a partnership. Slater v. Slater (Sup.) 363. Equity held to have jurisdiction of a partnership accounting as to a certain contract, though a dissolution is not sought.-Lord v. Murchison (Sup.) 321. § 2. Death of partner, and surviving partners. Return nulla bona of an execution issued on a judgment against a surviving partner held to authorize suit against the executor of a deceased partner, regardless of whether Laws 1897, c. 420, § 6, authorizes such an action in the first instance.-Leggat v. Leggat (Sup.) 327. Interpretation of Laws 1897, c. 420, § 6, in regard to partnership obligations, held, under the pleadings and evidence, not to be up for review by exceptions taken on a trial against the executor of a deceased partner.-Leggat v. Leggat (Sup.) 327. PATENTS. Proof that the return nulla bona of an execu- See "Carriers," § 2. tion against a surviving partner was brought about by collusion between the plaintiff and the surviving partner held not a defense to an action against the executor of a deceased partner, regardless of the construction of Laws 1897, c. 420, § 6.-Leggat v. Leggat (Sup.) 327. § 1. Persons entitled to patents. A firm has no right to use the inventions of a partner without compensation, though its. |