The New York Supplement, Volume 259West Publishing Company, 1933 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 75
Page 706
Sur . Ct . uninterrupted cohabitation between the parties , and this cohabita- tion was : ( a ) In the only home that the parties had in this city , the home which previously he maintained with a wife who divorced him in 1912. ( b ) It ...
Sur . Ct . uninterrupted cohabitation between the parties , and this cohabita- tion was : ( a ) In the only home that the parties had in this city , the home which previously he maintained with a wife who divorced him in 1912. ( b ) It ...
Page 748
... parties has always been held important as evidence to prove it . A single act of consummation and a single act of recognition would be compe- tent to support the contention that the parties consented and actually entered into a marriage ...
... parties has always been held important as evidence to prove it . A single act of consummation and a single act of recognition would be compe- tent to support the contention that the parties consented and actually entered into a marriage ...
Page 750
... parties themselves cannot dissolve by release or other mutual agreement , for it is as much a marriage in the sight of God as if it had been in facie ecclesiæ . ' " 3. In Hutchins v . Kimmell , 31 Mich . 126 , 130 , 18 Am . Rep . 164 ...
... parties themselves cannot dissolve by release or other mutual agreement , for it is as much a marriage in the sight of God as if it had been in facie ecclesiæ . ' " 3. In Hutchins v . Kimmell , 31 Mich . 126 , 130 , 18 Am . Rep . 164 ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
175 Riverside Drive 232 West End A. L. Erlanger addressed affirmed alleged amended by Laws answer Appellate Division application asked Atlantic City attorney Bank Baron bill charge Charlotte Fixel Charlotte Lesley Civil Practice Act claim common-law marriage complaint constitute contestant contract Corporation counsel death decedent decedent's defendant denied Digests & Indexes Dillon entitled Erlanger's evidence executor fact filed held Hotel husband Indexes 259 insured issue judgment Julia Neilson jurisdiction jury Key Number Digests knew langer lien marriage Matter ment Misc motion Oneida county paid parties payment person petitioner plaintiff Pratt proceeding proof provision question Rensselaer County residuary estate respondent Shelburne Hotel statute subd Supreme Court Surrogate's Court testator testimony thereof tion topic & KEY Town of Whitestown trial Utica West End avenue wife witness York City York County