The New York Supplement, Volume 24West Publishing Company, 1893 "Cases argued and determined in the Court of Appeals, Supreme and lower courts of record of New York State, with key number annotations." (varies) |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 82
Page 4
the benefit of the firm , and the purchase money therefor was paid by the firm . Subsequently George Riddell assigned his interest in the contract to the plaintiff , and thereupon the premises were conveyed to him in accordance with the ...
the benefit of the firm , and the purchase money therefor was paid by the firm . Subsequently George Riddell assigned his interest in the contract to the plaintiff , and thereupon the premises were conveyed to him in accordance with the ...
Page 11
... firm , and in con- templation of it the debtors had sought to prefer certain creditors , which purpose was held ineffectual . The supreme court of Illinois does not accept the views of the court in White v . Cotzhausen as expressive of ...
... firm , and in con- templation of it the debtors had sought to prefer certain creditors , which purpose was held ineffectual . The supreme court of Illinois does not accept the views of the court in White v . Cotzhausen as expressive of ...
Page 22
... firm ; that said chat- tel mortgage was received by said defendant Mary J. Perrine to secure a valid indebtedness , and without intent on her part to hinder , delay , or defraud any of the creditors of said firm , ” — and , as ...
... firm ; that said chat- tel mortgage was received by said defendant Mary J. Perrine to secure a valid indebtedness , and without intent on her part to hinder , delay , or defraud any of the creditors of said firm , ” — and , as ...
Page 36
... firm of Deering , Bergin & Company , why John J. Deering and James Hanse should not be punished and fined for contempt of this court : Now , upon reading and filing the order to show cause dated March 20 , 1893 , the affidavit of George ...
... firm of Deering , Bergin & Company , why John J. Deering and James Hanse should not be punished and fined for contempt of this court : Now , upon reading and filing the order to show cause dated March 20 , 1893 , the affidavit of George ...
Page 37
... firm , to require the sheriff to deliver up certain property , which , pre- vious to the appointment of the receiver , the sheriff had seized on executions issued on judgments obtained by appellants against said firm , Bartholomew Peck ...
... firm , to require the sheriff to deliver up certain property , which , pre- vious to the appointment of the receiver , the sheriff had seized on executions issued on judgments obtained by appellants against said firm , Bartholomew Peck ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
affidavit affirmed agent agreement alleged amount Appeal from special application appointed Argued before BARNARD assignment attorney authority Bank cause of action charge claim complaint concur contract corporation costs counsel court of equity creditors damages death debt deceased decree deed defendant appeals defendant's DYKMAN entitled equity evidence execution executors fact favor fendant firm Grant & Ward granted guardian guardian ad litem held indorsement injury interest issue John judge judgment July 28 jurisdiction jury land liable lien MAYHAM ment mortgage motion N. E. Rep N. Y. Supp owner paid parties payment person plaintiff possession premises proceedings proof purchase question Railroad received recover referred respondent reversed rule service of process special term statute Supreme Court surrogate's court testator testimony thereof tiff tion trial trust verdict widow witness York York county