Reports of Cases Determined in the Appellate Courts of Illinois, Volume 90 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 96
Page 15
... . - The law presumes that the signature of a guarantor on a promissory note was placed upon it at the time the note was executed . ཆེ ཙ 90 15 91 409 VOL . 90. ] Duncanson v . Kirby . 5. FIRST DISTRICT - OCTOBER TERM , 1899 . 15.
... . - The law presumes that the signature of a guarantor on a promissory note was placed upon it at the time the note was executed . ཆེ ཙ 90 15 91 409 VOL . 90. ] Duncanson v . Kirby . 5. FIRST DISTRICT - OCTOBER TERM , 1899 . 15.
Page 17
... executed , and that , he being a stranger to the note , his contract was that of guarantor , the consideration for the note being the consideration for the guaranty . Maher v . Bldg . & Loan Ass'n , 79 Ill . App . 231 ; Davis v . Wolff ...
... executed , and that , he being a stranger to the note , his contract was that of guarantor , the consideration for the note being the consideration for the guaranty . Maher v . Bldg . & Loan Ass'n , 79 Ill . App . 231 ; Davis v . Wolff ...
Page 25
... executed at the risk of the customer , and that they , appellees , had no interest in the trades save to the extent of their commis- sion . One of the appellees was asked upon his examination if appellee had any knowledge of the source ...
... executed at the risk of the customer , and that they , appellees , had no interest in the trades save to the extent of their commis- sion . One of the appellees was asked upon his examination if appellee had any knowledge of the source ...
Page 65
... execution of the two notes secured by the trust deed sought to be fore- closed and the execution of the trust deed by him , but alleges that he was not indebted to the appellee Blair the amount claimed , that appellant had never ...
... execution of the two notes secured by the trust deed sought to be fore- closed and the execution of the trust deed by him , but alleges that he was not indebted to the appellee Blair the amount claimed , that appellant had never ...
Page 79
... executed by the same party . That to secure the payment of said notes and the interest thereon , the said defendant , Weller D. Bishopp ( a widower ) , executed his trust deed , conveying to Henry A. Knott , as trustee , the premises ...
... executed by the same party . That to secure the payment of said notes and the interest thereon , the said defendant , Weller D. Bishopp ( a widower ) , executed his trust deed , conveying to Henry A. Knott , as trustee , the premises ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affidavit Affirmed alleged amount appear appellant's appellee appellee's assessment Assumpsit attorneys for appellant bill of exceptions Branch Appellate Court cause Circuit Court claim contract Cook County corporation counsel Court of Cook court of equity cross-bill damages deceased declaration decree defendant in error delivered the opinion equity evidence execution fact foreclosure Heard Illinois injury instruction interest issue Judge judgment July 17 jurors jury Knott lant liable loan matter ment mortgage motion negligence Newlin Northern Trust Co October term Opinion filed July paid party payment person plaintiff in error premises premium PRESIDING JUSTICE Prevo Pyott question railroad company Rapid Transit reason received record recover refused Reversed and remanded rule statute stockholders suit Superior Court sustained testified testimony thereof tion tracks train trial court trust deed usury verdict West Chicago witness writ of error
Popular passages
Page 112 - Whenever, therefore, whether from personal incapacity, the nature of the contract, or any other cause, the contract is incapable of being enforced against one party, that party is equally incapable of enforcing it against the other, though its execution in the latter way might in itself be free from the difficulty attending its execution in the former.
Page 291 - ... therefore beyond the powers conferred upon it by the legislature, is not voidable only, but wholly void, and of no legal effect. The objection to the contract is, not merely that the corporation ought not to have made it, but that it could not make it. The contract cannot be ratified by either party, because it could not have been authorized by either. No performance on either side can give the unlawful contract any validity, or be the foundation of any right of action upon it.
Page 291 - a contract of a corporation, which Is ultra vires, In the proper sense, that Is to say, outside the object of its creation as defined in the law of its organization, and therefore beyond the powers conferred upon it by the Legislature, Is not voidable only, but wholly void, and of no legal effect — the objection to the contract is not merely that the corporation ought not to have made it, but that It could not make it.
Page 291 - ... one contracting with a corporation, to take notice of the legal limits of its powers ; the interest of the stockholders, not to be subjected to risks which they have never undertaken ; and, above all, the interest of the public, that the corporation shall not transcend the powers conferred upon it by law.
Page 636 - ... that where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to* believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from averring against the latter a different state of things as existing at the same time.
Page 291 - The charter of a corporation, read in the light of any general laws which are applicable, is the measure of its powers, and the enumeration of those powers implies the exclusion of all others not fairly incidental.
Page 591 - In cases, however, where persons are employed in the performance of ordinary labor, in which no machinery is used and no materials furnished the use of which requires the exercise of great skill and care, it can scarcely be claimed that a defective instrument or tool furnished by the master, of which the employee has full knowledge and comprehension, can be regarded as making out a case of liability within the rule laid down.
Page 18 - Suspicion of defect of title or the knowledge of circumstances which would excite such suspicion in the mind of a prudent man, or gross negligence on the part of the taker, at the time of the transfer, will not defeat his title. That result can be produced only by bad faith on his part.
Page 486 - No railroad corporation shall issue any stock or bonds, except for money, labor or property actually received, and applied to the purposes for which such corporation was created; and all stock dividends, and other fictitious increase of the capital stock or indebtedness of any such corporation, shall be void. The capital stock of no railroad corporation shall be increased for any purpose, except upon giving sixty days' public notice, in such manner as may be provided by law.
Page 652 - Every husband, wife, child, parent, guardian, employer or other person, who shall be injured in person or property, or means of support, by any intoxicated .person, or in consequence of the intoxication, habitual or otherwise, of any person...