Sharpless v. Mayor, 21 Pa. St. 147... Shawnee Compress Co. v. Anderson, 209 U. S. 423; 28 Sup. Ct. Rep. 572; 52 L. ed. 865.. Sheffield Furnace Co. v. Witherow, 149 U. S. 574; 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 936; 37 L. ed. 853..... PAGE. 586 761 1026 Shelby County v. Guy, 11 Wh. 361; 6 L. ed. 495. Sheppard v. Taylor, 5 Pet. 675; 8 L. ed. 269.. .1022, 1029 1280 Sherlock v. Alling, 93 U. S. 99; 23 L. ed. 819.... .728, 745. 1114 Shively v. Bowlby, 152 U. S. 1; 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 548; 38 L. ed. 331.241, 335 Shoemaker v. United States, 147 U. S. 282; 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 361; 37 L. ed. 170 .932, 1179 .90, 149, 545, 1154 Siebold, Ex parte, 100 U. S. 371; 25 L. ed. 717... 44 L. ed. 864... Shurtleff v. United States, 189 U. S. 311; 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 535; 47 L. ed. 828 989 1184 .20, 876, 1264 Sinking Fund Cases, 99 U. S. 700; 25 L. ed. 496.. Slaughter House Cases, 16 Wall. 36; 21 L. ed. 394..177, 276, 850, 851, Smelting Co. v. Kemp, 104 U. S. 636; 26 L. ed. 875..... 1096 200 854 895 Smith v. Alabama, 124 U. S. 465; 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 564; 31 L. ed. 508.. 29 Smith v. Moody, 26 Ind. 299.... 63, 1280 666, 1037 Smith v. St. Louis, etc., Ry. Co., 181 U. S. 248; 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 603; Smith v. Reeves, 178 U. S. 436; 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 919; 44 L. ed. 1140. 45 L. ed. ..... 675 1060 Smith v. United States, 1 Wash. Ter. 269.. Smyth v. Ames, 169 U. S. 466; 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 418; 42 L. ed. 819.. 731, 732, 874, 1330 149 1092 365 606 Snow v. United States, 18 Wall. 317; 21 L. ed. 784.. South Carolina v. Georgia, 93 U. S. 4; 23 L. ed. 782. 886 1043 ..28, 46, 619, 1095 South Carolina v. United States, 199 U. S. 437; 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 110; 50 L. ed. 261...... South Dakota v. North Carolina, 192 U. S. 286; 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 269; 48 L. ed. 448.... 1066 South Ottawa v. Perkins, 94 U. S. 260; 24 L. ed. 154.. 1023 36 L. ed. 942.. 986 Spalding v. Vilas, 161 U. S. 483; 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 631; 40 L. ed. 780 1313 Spencer v. Board, 8 D. C. 169. Spencer v Merchant, 125 U. S. 345; 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 921; 31 L. ed. 763. Spratt v. Spratt, 4 Pet. 393; 7 L. ed. 897.. PAGE. 259 932 ...... 183 259 Spreckles Sugar Refining Co. v. McClain, 192 U. S. 397; 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 376; 48 L. ed. 496.... 281 619 Springer v. United States, 102 U. S. 586; 26 L. ed. 253........63, 616, 1279 Springville v. Thomas, 166 U. S. 707; 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 717; 41 L. ed. 1172. 408 Stanley v. Schwalby, 162 U. S. 255; 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 754; 40 L. ed. 960 ... St. Louis v. Western Union Tel. Co., 148 U. S. 92; 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 485; 37 L. ed. 380... ...379, 702 .... .1102, 1105 Stanly County v. Coler, 190 U. S. 347; 23 Sup. Ct. Rep. 811; 47 L. ed. 1126 925 State Bank of Ohio v. Knoop, 16 How. 369; 14 L. ed. 977... 1317 600 586 914 State Board of Assessors v. Comptoir National D'Escompte, 191 U. S. 388; 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 109; 48 L. ed. 232... 965 State Freight Tax Case, 15 Wall. 232; 21 L. ed. 146.. .663, 720, 968 .598, 725, 967 110; 50 L. ed. 261.. . . . . . 115 State Tax on Foreign Held Bonds, 15 Wall. 300; 21 L. ed. 179..955, 961, 963 State Tax on Railway Gross Receipts, 15 Wall. 284; 21 L. ed. 164.. 720 State ex rel. Foot v. Bazille, 97 Minn. 11.. 600 212 L. ed. 1041.. 312 Stewart v. B. & O. R. R. Co., 168 U. S. 445; 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 105; 42 L. ed. 537. 200 Stewart v. Kahn, 11 Wall. 493; 20 L. ed. 176.... PAGE. ..339, 1213 Stockard v. Morgan, 185 U. S. 27; 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 576; 46 L. ed. 785. Stone v. Ill. Cent. Ry. Co., 116 U. S. 347; 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 348; 29 L. ed. 650 ... Stone v. Mississippi, 101 U. S. 814; 25 L. ed. 1079.. Stoutenburgh v. Hennick, 129 U. S. 141; 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 256; 32 L. ed. 637 ... 706 910 .903, 905 Strader v. Graham, 10 How. 82; 13 L. ed. 337.. 241 984 26 Sturges v. Crowninshield, 4 Wh. 122; 4 L. ed. 529.......... Sugar Trust Case of United States v. E. C. Knight Co., 156 U. S. 1; 15 752 Sully v. American National Bank, 178 U. S. 289; 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 935; 44 L. ed. 1072.... 221 Supervisors v. Durant, 9 Wall. 415; 19 L. ed. 732.. 142 Swafford v. Templeton, 185 U. S. 487; 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 783; 46 L. ed. Swift v. United States, 105 U. S. 691; 26 L. ed. 1108. 26 Swift & Co. v. United States, 196 U. S. 375; 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 276; 49 758 T. Talbot v. Janson, 3. Dall, 133; 1 L. ed. 540... ..260, 290 Tappan v. Merchants' National Bank, 19 Wall. 490; 22 L. ed. 180.... 958 960, 963 Tarble's Case, 13 Wall. 397; 20 L. ed. 597..... Taylor v. Morton, 2 Curt, C. C. 454; Fed. Cas. No. 13,799. Terlinden v. Ames, 184 U. S. 270; 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 484; 46 L. ed. Terrett v. Taylor, 9 Cr. 43; 3 L. ed. 650.. 809 Terry, Ex parte, 128 U. S. 289; 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 77; 32 L. ed. 405...... Thomas v. Loney, 134 U. S. 372; 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 384; 33 L. ed. 949.. 435 931 134 864 599 Thompson v. Missouri, 171 U. S. 380; 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 922; 43 L. ed. 204 805 822 .. Thompson v. Kidder (N. H.), 65 Atl. Rep. 392.. PAGE. Thompson v. United States, 155 U. S. 271; 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 73; 39 Thompson v. Utah, 170 U. S. 343; 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 620; 42 L. ed. 1061 819 ..408, 804, 808, 814 96 386 502 Thomson v. Union Pacific R. Co., 9 Wall. 579; 19 L. ed. 792.......... Tindal v. Wesley, 167 U. S. 204; 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 770; 42 L. ed. 137.. 1103 91... 138, 888 855 1083 Toledo, etc., R. Co. v. Penn. Co., 54 Fed. Rep. 730.... 1170 .17, 18, Treat v. White, 181 U. S. 264; 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 611; 45 L. ed. 853.... Trono v. United States, 199 U. S. 521; 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 121; 50 L. ed. 292 ... 19 821 Tua v. Carriere, 117 U. S. 201; 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 565; 29 L. ed. 855..... Turner v. Maryland, 107 U. S. 38; 2 Sup. Ct. Rep. 44; 27 L. ed. 370.661, 766; 42 L. ed. 134..... 253 611 625 566 Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78; 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 14; 53 L. ed. 97.. .824, 857, 859, 861 877 Twitchell v. Penn., 7 Wall. 321; 19 L. ed. 223.. Tyler, In re, 149 U. S. 164; 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 785; 37 L. ed. 689...1083, 1092 Tyler v. Defrees, 11 Wall. 331; 20 L. ed. 161.. 1215 599 Tyson v. State, 28 Ind. 577.... U. Ulman v. Baltimore, 165 U. S. 719; 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1001; 41 L. ed. Union Bridge Co. v. United States, 204 U. S. 364; 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 367; 51 L. ed. 523...... 1322 Union Pacific R. R. Co. v. Peniston, 18 Wall. 5; 21 L. ed. 787......97, 714 955 Union Trust Co. v. Wayne Probate Judge, 125 Mich. 487. 599 488. 27 United States v. Anthony, 11 Blatchf. 200.. 259 United States v. Arjona, 120 U. S. 479; 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 628; 30 L. ed. 728 .. .256, 795 United States v. Bailey, 9 Pet. 238; 9 L. ed. 113.. United States v. Ballin, 144 U. S. 1; 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 507; 36 L. ed. 321 PAGE. 1329 563 United States v. Ball, 163 U. S. 662; 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1192; 41 L. ed. .820, 821 114 32 L. ed. 450...... 1167 United States v. Bevans, 3 Wh. 336; 4 L. ed. 404.. 1113 United States v. Black, 128 U. S. 40; 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 12; 32 L. ed. 354. 1299 United States v. Buford, 3 Pet. 12; 7 L. ed. 585... 1070 United States v. Burr, 2 Burr's Trial, 405. 839 United States v. Butterworth, 112 U. S. 50; 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 25; 28 L. ed. 656..... 1276 United States v. Carlisle, 16 Wall. 147; 21 L. ed. 426. 246 United States v. Circuit Court, 126 Fed. Rep. 169... 145 United States v. Clarke, 8 Pet. 436; 8 L. ed. 1001. 1096 United States v. Cobb, 11 Fed. Rep. 76.. 1164 United States v. Coe, 155 U. S. 76; 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 16; 39 L. ed. 76.. 370 745 259 United States v. Cross, 1 MacArthur, 149.. 812 United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542; 23 L. ed. 588.....538, 845, 877 United States v. D., L. & W. R. Co. (C. C.), 152 Fed. Rep. 269. 732 United States v. Dawson, 15 How. 467; 14 L. ed. 775.... United States v. Delaware & H. Co., 213 U. S. 366; 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 527; 53 L. ed. 836...... United States v. Diekelman, 92 U. S. 520; 23 L. ed. 742.. 1242 559 1276 ..... United States v. E. C. Knight Co., 156 U. S. 1; 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 249; 39 L. ed. 325.... 641 United States v. Eaton, 144 U. S. 677; 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 764; 36 L. ed. 591 .. 1328 United States v. Eliason, 16 Pet. 291; 10 L. ed. 968.. .1160, 1164, 1326 .1178, 1274 58 L. ed. 846... .299, 769 United States v. Freeman, 3 How. 556; 11 L. ed. 724.. 1208 United States v. Gleason, 78 Fed. 396..... 282 United States v. Germaine, 99 U. S. 508; 25 L. ed. 482. 1174 United States v. Gratiot, 14 Pet. 526; 10 L. ed. 573.. 353 United States v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co., 112 U. S. 645; 5 Sup. United States v. Gue Lim, 176 U. S. 459; 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 415; 44 L. ed. 544.... 485 |