Decisions of the Department of the Interior and the General Land Office in Cases Relating to the Public Lands, Volume 8

Front Cover
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1889
0 Reviews
Reviews aren't verified, but Google checks for and removes fake content when it's identified

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

Martin 2 L D 333
23
bond holders have no standing in the
25
February 13 1889 Railroads act of March
27
the benefit of another the settler is not
28
California and Oregon R R Co v Califor
30
minimum if it had not been reserved
31
Kennicott 94 U S 498 261
36
Shannon
38
Harris Adam S 8 L D
45
Ruile
53
crease does not therefore extend to
58
Missouri Kansas
64
July 17 1854 10 Stat 304
70
R R
72
294
73
Kelley 8 L D
75
373 453
77
1889
79
Page
81
Disintegrating Co 18 Wall 272
84
Carpenter Chauncey 7 L D 236
87
Atlantic and Pacific R R Co v Buck
93
115
94
Alabama and Chattanooga R
95
Knans Benjamin
96
Harrison James A 8 L D
98
CIRCULARS AND INSTRUCTIONS CITED MODIFIED
108
Contral Pacific R R Co o Benity 5 Saw
117
Atlantic and Pacific R R Co v
121
Co v
122
May 24 1826 School selections Public
129
Alderson John
140
551
144
452
156
introduced and considered on an issue
159
January 1 1836 Private entry restora
161
of all the facts and has remained undis
165
February 26 1857 11 Stat 166
166
State of Minnesota
179
Allen et al v Merrill et al 207 Buettner Ernst
185
355
186
State of Oregon
189
July 5 1862 12 Stat 620 joint
190
284
191
Alta Mill Site
195
Atlantic and Pacific R R Co v McCabe
200
proof on the day fixed may be cured by
202
March 21 1857 Sioux scrip 1 Lester
216
April 22 1880 Revocation of mineral
224
of the Missouri Home Guard
235
July 2 1864 13 Stat 356
237
Devoe Lizzie A 5 L D 4 modified 5 L D 429
238
399
250
March 3 1865 13 Stat 526
258
Kansas Pacific R R Co 5 C L O
262
Taylor 116 U S 567
264
243
277
July 23 1866 14 Stat 218 sec 1
279
Hartzell Thomas B 5 L D 124
281
and S Paul Ry Co v
291
Lewis et al Sioux City and
292
Tarr Jennie M 7 L D 67
296
July 25 1866 14 Stat 210
301
State of California 6 L D
307
Pope 12 Wheat 588
314
March 3 1873 17 Stat 609
315
72
318
Waite Fred
330
warranted by evidence independently
331
Harris E
344
of any other purchaser where it was open
346
Call Frances M 5 L D
348
Warren Emma
373
voke an allowance of rightofway privileges
374
Disch John B 8 L D 31
377
Rickard 1 1 D 146 overruled 6 L 797
380
104
389
March 20 1804 5 Stat 596
391
Texas Pacific Grant 8 L D 530
393
Larmore 116 U S 198
394
Hemsworth v Holland on
400
Northern Pacific R R Co 1 L
404
of a deceased preemptor from a decision
405
nauthorized to take will not prevent equi
411
Dole David B 3 L D 214
415
Piper 3 L D 162
420
137 332
421
Wintamute D D
431
Downey Owen D 6 L D 23 51 114 432 451
432
Mason George
437
Arnold Dotson et al v
439
ricultural must show as a present fact that
440
view
444
307
448
Avery et al Pratt v on review
457
Stark 107 U S
463
Hoffman v Barnes et
470
183
485
Pennell Lewis
493
Talbot Thomas
495
Bishop 6 L D 608
500
Mather Daniel on review
505
Ballew Edward C
508
any court of record in the judicial district
509
Forsythe et al 21 How 389 214
512
and improvement existing when the grant
520
Shannon on review
530
January 31 1885 23 Stat 296
532
Banks Nathaniel on review 532 Carberry Barker v
535
155
536
subsequent application of the appellant
541
Inglet Naphtali
542
Barnes et al Hoffman v
544
sec 2
546
made where commutation proof has been
547
Rethke et
551
Haynes 7 L D 8
554
636
555
West
570
Barnes Julius A 6 L D 522 89 410572
572
Ford 8 C L O 6 overruled 4 L Tripp v Stewart 7 C L O 39 modified 6 L D
581
Co v
588
Engle
589
Winona and St Peter R R Co
592
Zalondek Streib v
601
Bissell
606
Eshom
615
the final entry should be submitted to
626
Southern Pacific R R Co 9 C
636
Holland G W 6 L D 20 overruled 6 L D 256
639
1
641
Kansas Pacific R R Co v Dunmeyer
642
Section 2291
658
Bregard et al Napthalyv
659
Cain James A 7 L D 482
660
original entry and found insullicient
661
Homestead
662
Minnesota
664
ordering will not be interfered with
666
Kearney Thomas 7 L D 29
667
section 2260 R S to precludo removal
668
570
671
published notice of the tiling of the town
672
528
673

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 290 - That any person who is the head of a family, or who has arrived at the age of twenty-one years, and is a citizen of the United States...
Page 351 - ... to citizens of the United States, or persons who have declared their intention to become such...
Page 487 - ... that he has not, directly or indirectly, made any agreement or contract, in any way or manner, with any person or persons whatsoever, by which the title which he might acquire from the government of the United States should inure, in whole or in part, to the benefit of any person except...
Page 123 - If no adverse claim shall have been filed with the register and the receiver of the proper land office at the expiration of the sixty days of publication, it shall be assumed that the applicant is entitled to a patent, upon the payment to the proper officer of five dollars per acre, and that no adverse claim exists ; and thereafter Opinion of the Court.
Page 196 - Where non-mineral land not contiguous to the vein or lode is used or occupied by the proprietor of such vein or lode for mining or milling purposes, such non-adjacent surface ground may be embraced and included in an application for a patent for such vein or lode, and the same may be patented therewith, subject to the same preliminary requirements as to survey and notice as are applicable to veins or lodes...
Page 118 - States, which shall have filed with the Secretary of the Interior a copy of its articles of incorporation, and due proofs of its organization under the same, to the extent of one hundred feet on each side of the central line of said road...
Page 389 - ... the claim or mine upon which such failure occurred shall be open to relocation in the same manner as If no location of the same had ever been made, provided that the original locators, their heirs, assigns, or legal representatives, have not resumed work upon the claim after failure and before such location.
Page 123 - ... together with a notice of such application for a patent, in a conspicuous place on the land embraced in such plat previous to the filing of the application for a patent, and shall file an affidavit of at least two persons, that such notice has been duly posted...
Page 361 - Where two or more veins intersect or cross each other, priority of title shall govern, and such prior location shall be entitled to all ore or mineral contained within the space of intersection ; but the subsequent location shall have the right of way through the space of intersection for the purposes of the convenient working of the mine.
Page 169 - ... every alternate section of public land, not mineral, designated by odd numbers, to the amount of twenty alternate sections per mile, on each side of said railroad line, as said company may adopt, through the Territories of the United States, and ten alternate sections 'of land per mile on each side of said railroad, whenever it passes through any State...

Bibliographic information